Eric R Crouch1, Raymond T Kraker2, David K Wallace3, Jonathan M Holmes4, Michael X Repka5, Janine E Collinge6,7, Don L Bremer8, Michael E Gray9, Heather A Smith3, Paul G Steinkuller10. 1. Virginia Pediatric Eye Center, Virginia Beach. 2. Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. 4. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Wilmer Institute, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Dean A. McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City. 7. Now with Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut. 8. Pediatric Ophthalmology Associates Inc, Columbus, Ohio. 9. Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio. 10. Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Abstract
Importance: Lower bevacizumab dosages are being used for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity, but there are limited data on long-term ocular outcomes with lower doses. Objective: To evaluate ocular outcomes at 12 months' corrected age for eyes that received a dose of 0.625 mg, 0.25 mg, 0.125 mg, 0.063 mg, or 0.031 mg of bevacizumab for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study used a masked, multicenter, phase 1 dose de-escalation study design and was conducted from April 2016 to October 2017. Study eyes were treated with a dose of 0.25, 0.125, 0.063, or 0.031 mg of bevacizumab; fellow eyes were treated with a dosage 1 level higher than the study eye. Additional treatment after 4 weeks was at investigator discretion. Data analysis occurred from November 2018 to March 2019. Interventions: Intravitreous bevacizumab injections of 0.625 mg to 0.031 mg. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual fixation, amblyopia, alignment, nystagmus, cycloplegic refraction, and ocular examinations were assessed at 12 months' corrected age as preplanned secondary outcomes. The primary outcome 4 weeks after treatment and secondary outcomes after 6 months' corrected age have been previously reported. Results: Forty-six of 61 infants (75%) had a 12-month follow-up examination (46 study eyes and 43 fellow eyes; median [interquartile range] birth weight, 650 [590-760] g). Of 87 eyes with a cycloplegic refraction, 12 (14% [95% CI, 7%-27%]) had myopia of more than -5.00 D spherical equivalent; 2 (2%; [95% CI, 0%-8%]) had hyperopia greater than 5.00 D spherical equivalent; and 5 infants (11% [95% CI, 4%-24%]) had anisometropia greater than 1.50 D spherical equivalent. Abnormalities of the cornea, lens, or anterior segment were reported in 1 eye (1% [95% CI, 0%-6%]), 3 eyes (3% [95% CI, 1%-10%]), and 3 eyes (3% [95% CI, 1%-10%]), respectively. Optic nerve atrophy was identified in 11 eyes (13% [95% CI, 6%-26%]), and 1 eye (1% [95% CI, 0%-6%]) had total retinal detachment. Strabismus was reported in 13 infants (30% [95% CI, 17%-45%]), manifest nystagmus in 7 infants (15% [95% CI, 6%-29%]), and amblyopia in 3 infants (7% [95% CI, 1%-18%]). Overall, 98% of infants had central fixation in each eye (44 of 45 eyes). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of low-dose bevacizumab, the secondary outcomes of high myopia, strabismus, retinal detachment, nystagmus, and other ocular abnormalities at 1 year were consistent with rates reported in other studies with higher dosages. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02390531.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Lower bevacizumab dosages are being used for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity, but there are limited data on long-term ocular outcomes with lower doses. Objective: To evaluate ocular outcomes at 12 months' corrected age for eyes that received a dose of 0.625 mg, 0.25 mg, 0.125 mg, 0.063 mg, or 0.031 mg of bevacizumab for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study used a masked, multicenter, phase 1 dose de-escalation study design and was conducted from April 2016 to October 2017. Study eyes were treated with a dose of 0.25, 0.125, 0.063, or 0.031 mg of bevacizumab; fellow eyes were treated with a dosage 1 level higher than the study eye. Additional treatment after 4 weeks was at investigator discretion. Data analysis occurred from November 2018 to March 2019. Interventions: Intravitreous bevacizumab injections of 0.625 mg to 0.031 mg. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual fixation, amblyopia, alignment, nystagmus, cycloplegic refraction, and ocular examinations were assessed at 12 months' corrected age as preplanned secondary outcomes. The primary outcome 4 weeks after treatment and secondary outcomes after 6 months' corrected age have been previously reported. Results: Forty-six of 61 infants (75%) had a 12-month follow-up examination (46 study eyes and 43 fellow eyes; median [interquartile range] birth weight, 650 [590-760] g). Of 87 eyes with a cycloplegic refraction, 12 (14% [95% CI, 7%-27%]) had myopia of more than -5.00 D spherical equivalent; 2 (2%; [95% CI, 0%-8%]) had hyperopia greater than 5.00 D spherical equivalent; and 5 infants (11% [95% CI, 4%-24%]) had anisometropia greater than 1.50 D spherical equivalent. Abnormalities of the cornea, lens, or anterior segment were reported in 1 eye (1% [95% CI, 0%-6%]), 3 eyes (3% [95% CI, 1%-10%]), and 3 eyes (3% [95% CI, 1%-10%]), respectively. Optic nerve atrophy was identified in 11 eyes (13% [95% CI, 6%-26%]), and 1 eye (1% [95% CI, 0%-6%]) had total retinal detachment. Strabismus was reported in 13 infants (30% [95% CI, 17%-45%]), manifest nystagmus in 7 infants (15% [95% CI, 6%-29%]), and amblyopia in 3 infants (7% [95% CI, 1%-18%]). Overall, 98% of infants had central fixation in each eye (44 of 45 eyes). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of low-dose bevacizumab, the secondary outcomes of high myopia, strabismus, retinal detachment, nystagmus, and other ocular abnormalities at 1 year were consistent with rates reported in other studies with higher dosages. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02390531.
Authors: William V Good; Robert J Hardy; Velma Dobson; Earl A Palmer; Dale L Phelps; Betty Tung; Maryann Redford Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-04-12
Authors: David K Wallace; Trevano W Dean; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Lingkun Kong; Lois E Smith; G Baker Hubbard; Mary Lou McGregor; Catherine O Jordan; Iason S Mantagos; Edward F Bell; Raymond T Kraker Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Deborah K VanderVeen; Don L Bremer; Rae R Fellows; Robert J Hardy; Daniel E Neely; Earl A Palmer; David L Rogers; Betty Tung; William V Good Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: David T Wheeler; Velma Dobson; Michael F Chiang; Don L Bremer; Ira H Gewolb; Dale L Phelps; Robert J Hardy; William V Good; Rae Fellows; Betty P Tung; Earl A Palmer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Björn C Harder; Frank C Schlichtenbrede; Stefan von Baltz; Waldemar Jendritza; Bettina Jendritza; Jost B Jonas Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: David K Wallace; Raymond T Kraker; Sharon F Freedman; Eric R Crouch; Amy K Hutchinson; Amit R Bhatt; David L Rogers; Michael B Yang; Kathryn M Haider; Deborah K VanderVeen; R Michael Siatkowski; Trevano W Dean; Roy W Beck; Michael X Repka; Lois E Smith; William V Good; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Lingkun Kong; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Sharon F Freedman; Amra Hercinovic; David K Wallace; Raymond T Kraker; Zhuokai Li; Amit R Bhatt; Charline S Boente; Eric R Crouch; G Baker Hubbard; David L Rogers; Deborah VanderVeen; Michael B Yang; Nathan L Cheung; Susan A Cotter; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 14.277
Authors: Michael Simmons; Jingyun Wang; Joel N Leffler; Shanshan Li; Sarah E Morale; Angie de la Cruz; Eileen E Birch Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.283