Literature DB >> 31696778

Validation of the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS) and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale (SRSS) in three English-speaking regions.

Sarah Kölling1,2, Paul Schaffran1, Adam Bibbey3, Michael Drew4,5,6, Ben Raysmith7,8, Anu Nässi1, Michael Kellmann1,9.   

Abstract

The Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS) and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale (SRSS) are well-established monitoring tools in German-speaking countries. This study aimed at validating them for English-speaking populations. Overall, 996 athletes (536 males, 24.9 ± 9.1 years) of Australia/New Zealand (n = 380), the United Kingdom (n = 316), and North America (n = 300) participated. The 32-item ARSS consists of eight scales. These scales constitute the eight items of the SRSS with the corresponding ARSS items as descriptors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency (α), and discriminatory power of the items (rit) were calculated for the total and subsamples separately. Satisfactory discriminatory power (rit > .30) for all ARSS and SRSS items and acceptable internal consistency (α > .70) was achieved. CFA indicated good fit indices for the total sample and subsamples, and strong measurement invariance was found across subsamples and gender. Correlations between corresponding scales and items (rs = .68 - .78) support theoretical congruency as well as independent usage of both questionnaires. Construct validity of both tools is shown through hypothesis-conforming correlations with the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes. Future studies may apply the ARSS and SRSS as monitoring tools in English-speaking regions worldwide.

Keywords:  Monitoring; assessment; measurement invariance; psychology; training

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31696778     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1684790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  2 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Psychological Stress and Anxiety with Gastrointestinal Symptoms Before and During a 56 km Ultramarathon Running Race.

Authors:  Charles S Urwin; Luana C Main; Antonina Mikocka-Walus; David R Skvarc; Spencer S H Roberts; Dominique Condo; Amelia J Carr; Lilia Convit; William Jardine; Shant S Rahman; Rhiannon M J Snipe
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-12-11

Review 2.  Best Practices for Probiotic Research in Athletic and Physically Active Populations: Guidance for Future Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Alex E Mohr; Jamie Pugh; Orla O'Sullivan; Katherine Black; Jeremy R Townsend; David B Pyne; Floris C Wardenaar; Nicholas P West; Corrie M Whisner; Lynne V McFarland
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-03-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.