| Literature DB >> 31695884 |
Chellby R Kilheffer1, H Brian Underwood2, Jordan Raphael3, Lindsay Ries3, Shannon Farrell1, Donald J Leopold1.
Abstract
Coastal resilience is threatened as storm-induced disturbances become more frequent and intense with anticipated changes in regional climate. After severe storms, rapid recovery of vegetation, especially that of dune-stabilizing plants, is a fundamental property of coastal resilience. Herbivores may affect resilience by foraging and trampling in disturbed areas. Consequently, assessing the impacts of herbivores on recovering vegetation is important for coastal land management.We combined imagery classification, wildlife monitoring, and trend analysis to investigate effects of white-tailed deer on recovery rates of vegetation four years poststorm in nine overwashed areas. We estimated local deer density with trail cameras, how it relates to an index of primary productivity, and assessed the relationship between deer density and rates of vegetation recovery in overwash fans.Prestorm vegetation cover consisted of shrubs and sporadic patches of beach grass. Poststorm cover was dominated by beach grass. At current rates, vegetation coverage will return to prestorm conditions within the decade, though community transition from grasses to shrubs will take much longer and will vary by site with dune formation.The effect of deer on rates of vegetation recovery was negative, but not statistically significant nor biologically compelling. Although effects of deer trampling on beach grass are evident in classified imagery, deer foraging on beach grass had little effect on its rate of spread throughout overwash fans.While the rate of spread of the primary dune-building grass was not deleteriously affected by deer, locally high deer densities will likely affect the future establishment and development of herbs and shrubs, which are generally more palatable to deer than beach grass.Entities:
Keywords: Ammophila breviligulata; barrier island; imagery classification; random forest classification; resilience; white‐tailed deer
Year: 2019 PMID: 31695884 PMCID: PMC6822055 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Fire Island National Seashore is located off the southern coast of Long Island, New York, USA, and contains the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness Area
Figure 2Image classifications for Overwash fan #1, an area overwashed by Hurricane Sandy in the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness Area, New York. Trails where vegetation does not grow, predominantly as a result of deer trampling, are evident in prestorm (2010) and recovering (2015, 2016) imagery in overwash fans
Accuracy assessments for classified imagery from 2010, 2012, 2015, and 2016 in the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness Area, New York, including user's accuracies (UA), producer's accuracies (PA), overall accuracies (OA), and kappa statistics. Kappa statistics >0.61 indicate substantial agreement between the classified image and true land cover. See text for details
| Year | UA | PA | OA | Kappa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.75 |
| 2012 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.89 |
| 2015 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| 2016 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.92 |
Percent total vegetation cover from classified digital imagery of overwash fans (OW) in the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness Area, New York, before Hurricane Sandy (2010), in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy (2012), and in the third (2015) and fourth (2016) growing seasons after Hurricane Sandy and back‐transformed rates of change and initial total vegetation cover (%) in overwash fans among years since Hurricane Sandy
| OW1 | OW2 | OW3 | OW4 | OW5 | OW6 | OW7 | OW8 | OW9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 72.0 | 61.9 | 68.8 | 41.8 | 55.2 | 56.1 | 57.7 | 59.3 | 23.6 |
| 2012 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 2.3 |
| 2015 | 20.0 | 6.2 | 7.9 | 5.6 | 13.5 | 8.1 | 21.3 | 21.4 | 5.7 |
| 2016 | 23.9 | 12.7 | 29.6 | 14.0 | 22.2 | 20.1 | 27.7 | 37.2 | 11.3 |
| Slope | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.5 |
| Intercept | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 1.9 | 2.2 |
| Year | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 |
Year in which total vegetation coverage (not species composition) is predicted to return to prestorm conditions.
Figure 3Average Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and standard error bars for nine overwash fans (OW) from 2012 to 2017 in the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness Area, New York. Data are unavailable for overwash fans 3 and 8 in 2017
Local deer densities calculated from trail cameras in overwash fans (OW) in the Otis Pike Fire Island High Dune Wilderness Area, New York, in 2015 and 2016. Many deer were observed in multiple overwash fans, so values are not population estimates
| OW | Number unique deer | Number of obs. | Pop. factor | Total number of deer observed | Number of deer using OW | OW area (ha) | Local deer density (deer/ha) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | 32 | 19 | 3.2 | 6 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | – | 13 | 10 | 2.6 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | 24 | 0.21 | 58 | 12 | 0.7 | 18 | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 1.00 | 34 | 34 | 1.1 | 32 | |
| 5 | 6 | 23 | 0.26 | 71 | 19 | 1.4 | 14 | |
| 6 | 8 | 18 | 0.44 | 66 | 29 | 0.7 | 44 | |
| 7 | 11 | 93 | 0.12 | 266 | 31 | 0.6 | 52 | |
| 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.56 | 70 | 39 | 1.4 | 28 | |
| 9 | 9 | 44 | 0.20 | 105 | 21 | 0.8 | 27 | |
| 2016 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0.50 | 10 | 5 | 3.2 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 23 | 23 | 2.6 | 9 | |
| 3 | 8 | 15 | 0.53 | 48 | 26 | 0.7 | 38 | |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 1.00 | 14 | 14 | 1.1 | 13 | |
| 5 | 9 | 21 | 0.43 | 63 | 27 | 1.4 | 20 | |
| 6 | 11 | 23 | 0.48 | 68 | 33 | 0.7 | 49 | |
| 7 | 18 | 74 | 0.24 | 259 | 63 | 0.6 | 104 | |
| 8 | 3 | 4 | 0.75 | 15 | 11 | 1.4 | 8 | |
| 9 | 10 | 38 | 0.26 | 54 | 14 | 0.8 | 18 |
Number of obs. = Number of unique deer observations.
Pop. factor = Population factor from Jacobson et al. (1997).
Number of deer using OW = Population factor × Total number of deer observed.
Local deer density = Number of deer using OW/OW area.
Values imputed from regression using the number of unique deer (Y) and total number of deer observed (X) in each of the other overwash fans.