| Literature DB >> 31695877 |
Xiongjun Liu1,2, Jiajun Qin3, Yang Xu3, Min Zhou4, Xiaoping Wu1,2,3, Shan Ouyang3.
Abstract
Poyang Lake Basin is of great importance to maintain regional ecological balance. However, fish biodiversity in this basin has rapidly declined as the result of anthropogenic habitat alteration, such as dam construction, sand mining, and water pollution. Here, we aimed to analyze the temporal and spatial changes in biodiversity patterns of fish in Poyang Lake Basin over the last 37 years. The number of fish species underwent a significant decrease in the current period. In particular, 36.7% of the migration of fish was extirpated. Twenty-seven fish species have been formally assessed using the Chinese Red List were currently listed as Critically Endangered (9), Endangered (3), Vulnerable (10), and Near Threatened (5). Alpha and gamma diversity revealed that fish diversity had also decreased, and beta diversity showed significant composition dissimilarity in two periods. PCoA showed that the historical fish composition dissimilarity was significantly different from that of the current period. We found a significant effect of the geographical distance on the spatial turnover component for the historical and current periods. In addition, the nestedness component was the main contributor to beta diversity, which indicated one large protected area should be established in Poyang Lake and the Ganjiang River Basin with higher species richness. These results indicated that fish biodiversity declined in the current period likely caused by anthropogenic habitat alteration and other threatened factors. Therefore, we suggest that the habitat reconstruction and biodiversity conservation for fish have become imperative in this basin, and a complete management plan should be carried out.Entities:
Keywords: Poyang Lake Basin; beta diversity; biodiversity; conservation; fish
Year: 2019 PMID: 31695877 PMCID: PMC6822132 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Map showing the location of Poyang Lake Basin
The number of native species in Poyang Lake Basin during the historical period and the number and percentage of native, extirpated native, and alien fish species during the current period
| Basin | Historical | Current | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native | Introduced exotic species | Native | Ex‐Na | Introduced exotic species | |
| Poyang Lake | 152 | 0 | 107 | 45 (29.6%) | 4 (3.6%) |
| Ganjiang River | 181 | 0 | 136 | 45 (24.9%) | 8 (5.6%) |
| Fuhe River | 127 | 0 | 57 | 70 (55.1%) | 1 (1.7%) |
| Xinjiang River | 138 | 0 | 52 | 86 (62.3%) | 1 (1.9%) |
| Raohe River | 85 | 0 | 45 | 40 (47.1%) | 3 (6.3%) |
| Xiuhe River | 83 | 0 | 77 | 6 (7.2%) | 7 (8.3%) |
| Total | 212 | 0 | 165 | 63 | 9 |
The percentages of the extirpated native and introduced exotic species are in brackets.
Abbreviation: Ex‐Na, extirpated native.
Figure 2Comparison of the fish ecotypes in the historical and current periods (C, Carnivorous; DE, Demersal fish; H, Herbivorous; LL, Lower‐layer fish; M, Migration fish; MS, Mountain stream fish; O, Omnivorous; SE, Settlement fish; UL, Upper‐layer fish)
Figure 3Alpha and gamma diversity of the total fish species and the native species in Poyang Lake Basin during the historical and current periods
Fish compositional dissimilarities during the historical and current periods, as quantified by the Sørensen index (β sor), and its spatial turnover component (β sim) and nestedness component (β sne) in Poyang Lake Basin
| Basin | Historical | Current | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Poyang Lake | 0.29 ± 0.07 | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.14 ± 0.11 | 0.40 ± 0.07 | 0.17 ± 0.08 | 0.23 ± 0.12 |
| Ganjiang River | 0.29 ± 0.09 | 0.07 ± 0.05 | 0.22 ± 0.13 | 0.43 ± 0.10 | 0.10 ± 0.06 | 0.33 ± 0.16 |
| Fuhe River | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 0.13 ± 0.07 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.17 ± 0.10 | 0.19 ± 0.16 |
| Xinjiang River | 0.26 ± 0.06 | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.40 ± 0.09 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.20 ± 0.17 |
| Raohe River | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.10 ± 0.06 | 0.20 ± 0.13 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 0.18 ± 0.12 | 0.24 ± 0.19 |
| Xiuhe River | 0.31 ± 0.08 | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.21 ± 0.13 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.07 | 0.18 ± 0.06 |
| Mean | 0.28 ± 0.07 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.12 | 0.40 ± 0.08 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.13 |
Sørensen index (β sor) and its spatial turnover component (β sim) and nestedness component (β sne) for the historical and current periods based on all species, including native species, introduced exotic species, and 27 families
| Historical | Current | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| All species | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.03 |
| Native species | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.01 |
| Introduced exotic species | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.04 |
| Engraulidae | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.06 | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 0.24 ± 0.02 |
| Anguillidae | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.80 ± 0.02 |
| Cyprinidae | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.02 |
| Catostomidae | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.80 ± 0.02 |
| Cobitidae | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.04 |
| Siluridae | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.40 ± 0.02 |
| Clariidae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| Bagridae | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.03 |
| Amblycipitidae | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.06 | 0.67 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.03 |
| Sisoridae | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.90 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0.90 ± 0.03 |
| Salangidae | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.60 ± 0.01 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 |
| Hemiramphidae | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.80 ± 0.02 |
| Mastacembelidae | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.02 |
| Eleotridae | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 0 | 0.54 ± 0.03 |
| Gobiidae | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.56 ± 0.02 |
| Belontiidae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 0.54 |
| Channidae | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0 | 0.33 ± 0.02 |
| Homalopteridae | 0.81 ± 0.07 | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.05 |
| Serranidae | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.02 |
Values are the mean ± SD.
Figure 4Results of the principal component analysis (PCoA) on the Sørensen index (β sor), and its spatial turnover component (β sim) and nestedness component (β sne) of the fish species in the historical (a, c, e) and current periods (b, d, f) in Poyang Lake Basin
Effects of geographical drivers on the pairwise Sørensen index (β sor) and its spatial turnover component (β sim) and nestedness component (β sne) for the two periods in Poyang Lake Basin, China
| Geographical distance | Annual average runoff | Drainage area | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Historical | Current | Historical | Current | Historical | Current | ||
|
|
| −.029 | .132 | .292 | .390 | .047 | .341 |
|
| .470 | .250 | .090 |
| .510 | .100 | |
|
|
| −.464 | −.396 | .267 | −.219 | −.523 | −.522 |
|
|
|
| .160 | .230 | .100 |
| |
|
|
| .203 | .313 | .063 | .335 | .282 | .516 |
|
| .230 | .150 | .160 | .120 | .120 |
| |
Significant results are in bold.
p < .05.