| Literature DB >> 31695762 |
Li-Sen Lin1,2, Jun-Feng Wang3, Jibin Song4, Yijing Liu2, Guizhi Zhu2, Yunlu Dai2, Zheyu Shen2, Rui Tian2, Justin Song2, Zhantong Wang2, Wei Tang2, Guocan Yu2, Zijian Zhou2, Zhen Yang2, Tao Huang5, Gang Niu2, Huang-Hao Yang4, Zhi-Yi Chen1, Xiaoyuan Chen2.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-generating anticancer agents can act through two different mechanisms: (i) elevation of endogenous ROS production in mitochondria, or (ii) formation/delivery of exogenous ROS within cells. However, there is a lack of research on the development of ROS-generating nanosystems that combine endogenous and exogenous ROS to enhance oxidative stress-mediated cancer cell death.Entities:
Keywords: cancer therapy; magnetic resonance imaging; pH-responsiveness; reactive oxygen species; zinc peroxide nanoparticles
Year: 2019 PMID: 31695762 PMCID: PMC6831298 DOI: 10.7150/thno.39831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Schematic illustration of theranostic ZnO2 NPs for MRI and enhanced oxidative stress-based cancer therapy. Upon endocytosis by tumor cells, ZnO2 NPs undergo dissociation in response to mild acidic pH, causing the release of H2O2 and Zn2+. The exogenously released H2O2 and Zn2+, that can increase the production of mitochondrial O2·- and H2O2 by inhibiting the electron transport chain (ETC), act synergistically to promote cancer cell killing through the cooperation of endogenous and exogenous ROS. Moreover, Mn-doping via partial cation exchange imparts ZnO2 NPs with pH-activated MRI contrast ability.
Figure 2(A) TEM image and (B) DLS data of ZnO2 NPs. (C) Raman spectra of ZnO NPs and ZnO2 NPs. (D) XPS survey spectra and O 1s peak (inset) of ZnO2 NPs.
Figure 3Release profiles of (A) Zn2+ and (B) H2O2 from ZnO2 NPs at different pH values. (C) TEM images of ZnO2 NPs after 2 h of incubation in pH 7.4 (left) and pH 5.5 (right) buffer solutions. (D) Fluorescence images of zinquin ethyl ester-stained U87MG cells after incubation with different concentration of ZnO2 NPs for 4 h. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Figure 4(A) DCF fluorescence of U87MG cells after different treatments. [H2O2] = 200 μM, [ZnCl2] = 200 μM. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Cell viability after 24 h of exposure to H2O2, ZnCl2, or H2O2 plus ZnCl2 (molar ratio, 1:1).
Figure 5(A) In vitro anticancer activity of ZnO2 NPs after 24 h of incubation. (B) DCF fluorescence of U87MG cells after 4 h of incubation with 10 μg mL-1 ZnO2 NPs. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Calcein-AM (green, live cells) and PI (red, dead cells) co-stained fluorescence images of cells treated with different concentrations of ZnO2 NPs for 24 h. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Flow cytometry data showing apoptosis in U87MG cells after exposure to ZnO2 NPs for 12 h.
Figure 6(A) Scheme showing the preparation of Mn-doped ZnO2 NPs through a facile cation-exchange approach. (B) EDS mapping of Mn-ZnO2 NPs. (C) The r1 values of Mn-ZnO2 NPs under different pH conditions. (D) T1-weighted MRI of U87MG tumor-bearing mice after intravenous injection of Mn-doped ZnO2 NPs. The red circles indicate the tumor area.
Figure 7(A) Tumor growth curves of U87-bearing mice injected intravenously with different formulations. (B) Survival curves of mice in different groups. (C) Body weight changes of mice during the observation period. (D) TUNEL and (E) H&E staining of tumor tissues derived from different groups. Scale bar in d, 50 μm.