Literature DB >> 31695735

Effectiveness of a continuous patient position monitoring system in improving hospital turn protocol compliance in an ICU: A multiphase multisite study in India.

B S Renganathan1, Sridhar Nagaiyan2, S P Preejith3, Shameer Gopal4, Susovan Mitra2, Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers are a significant cause of morbidity and consume considerable financial resources. Turn protocols (repositioning patients at regular intervals) are utilized to reduce incidence of pressure ulcers. Adherence to turn protocols is particularly challenging for nursing teams, given the high number of interventions in intensive care unit, and lack of widely available tools to monitor patient position and generate alerts. We decided to develop and evaluate usefulness of a continuous patient position monitoring system to assist nurses in improving turn protocol compliance.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, multiphase, multicentre trial. In Phase I (control group), the function of the device was not revealed to nurses so as to observe their baseline adherence to turn protocol, while Phase II (intervention group) used continuous patient position monitoring system to generate alerts, when non-compliant with the turn protocol. All consecutive patients admitted to one of the two intensive care units during the study period were screened for enrolment. Patients at risk of acquiring pressure ulcers (Braden score < 18) were considered for the study (Phase I (N = 22), Phase II (N = 25)).
RESULTS: We analysed over 1450 h of patient position data collected from 40 patients (Phase I (N = 20), Phase II (N = 20)). Turn protocol compliance was significantly higher in Phase II (80.15 ± 8.97%) compared to the Phase I (24.36 ± 12.67%); p < 0.001.
CONCLUSION: Using a continuous patient position monitoring system to provide alerts significantly improved compliance with hospital turn protocol. Nurses found the system to be useful in providing automated turn reminders and prioritising tasks. © The Intensive Care Society 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pressure ulcer; bed sores; patient positioning; technology; wearable electronic devices

Year:  2018        PMID: 31695735      PMCID: PMC6820230          DOI: 10.1177/1751143718804682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  11 in total

1.  The prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients in a university hospital in India.

Authors:  V S Chauhan; S Goel; P Kumar; S Srivastava; V K Shukla
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of telephone-based support for the management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in India and Bangladesh.

Authors:  M Arora; L A Harvey; J V Glinsky; H S Chhabra; M S Hossain; N Arumugam; P K Bedi; I D Cameron; A J Hayes
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Pressure ulcer and patient characteristics--A point prevalence study in a tertiary hospital of India based on the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel minimum data set.

Authors:  Chitra Mehta; Joby V George; Yatin Mehta; Namgyal Wangmo
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.932

4.  A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; P J Demuth; B J Braden
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.208

5.  The turn team: a novel strategy for reducing pressure ulcers in the surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mary D Still; Linda C Cross; Martha Dunlap; Rugenia Rencher; Elizabeth R Larkins; David L Carpenter; Timothy G Buchman; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  The cost of pressure ulcers in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C Dealey; J Posnett; A Walker
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  Pressure Ulcer Surveillance in Neurotrauma Patients at a Level One Trauma Centre in India.

Authors:  Annu Babu; Kumar Madhavan; Maneesh Singhal; Sushma Sagar; Piyush Ranjan
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2015-11

8.  Evaluating optimal patient-turning procedures for reducing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (LS-HAPU): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David Pickham; Betsy Ballew; Kristi Ebong; Julie Shinn; Mary E Lough; Barbara Mayer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Healthcare professional acceptance of telemonitoring for chronic care patients in primary care.

Authors:  José Asua; Estibalitz Orruño; Eva Reviriego; Marie Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Pilot study: Assessing the effect of continual position monitoring technology on compliance with patient turning protocols.

Authors:  Suann Cirigliano Schutt; Christine Tarver; Michelle Pezzani
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2017-10-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Repositioning Practice of Bedridden Patients: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.

Authors:  Abdulkareem S Iblasi; Yupin Aungsuroch; Joko Gunawan; I Gede Juanamasta; Cheryl Carver
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2022-06-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.