| Literature DB >> 31695729 |
Bo Duan1, Yating Liu1, Yan Gong1,2, Yi Peng1,2, Xianting Wu3,2, Renshan Zhu3,2, Shenghui Fang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The accurate estimation of rice LAI is particularly important to monitor rice growth status. Remote sensing, as a non-destructive measurement technology, has been proved to be useful for estimating vegetation growth parameters, especially at large scale. With the development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), this novel remote sensing platform has been widely used to provide remote sensing images which have much higher spatial resolution. Previous reports have shown that the spectral feature of remote sensing images could be an effective indicator to estimate vegetation growth parameters. However, the texture feature of high-resolution remote sensing images is rarely employed for this purpose. Besides, the physical mechanism between the texture feature and vegetation growth parameters is still unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Fourier spectrum texture; Remote sensing; Rice LAI; UAV; Vegetation index
Year: 2019 PMID: 31695729 PMCID: PMC6824110 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0507-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Fig. 1a The study area and b the region of interest (ROI) in 42 rice plots
Fig. 2The air temperature change after the transplant of rice plant
The Vegetation Indices tested in this study
| Vegetation indices | Formula | References |
|---|---|---|
| Red-edge Chlorophyll Index (CIrededge) | R800nm/R720nm−1 | Gitelson et al. [ |
| Green-edge Chlorophyll Index (CIgreen) | R800nm/R550nm−1 | Gitelson et al. [ |
| Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) | (R800nm−R670nm)/(R800nm + R670nm) | Rouse et al. [ |
| Normalized Difference Red edge (NDRE) | (R800nm−R720nm)/(R800nm + R720nm) | Glenn et al. [ |
| Visible Atmospherically Resistant Index (VARI) | (R550nm-R670nm)/(R550nm + R670nm) | Gitelson et al. [ |
| MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index (MTCI) | (R800nm−R720nm)/(R720nm−R670nm) | Dash and Curran [ |
| Two-band Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI2) | 2.5(R800nm-R670nm)/(R800nm + 2.4R670nm + 1) | Jiang et al. [ |
Fig. 3a The origin image of Fourier transform, b the Fourier energy spectrum, c the rectangle ring used in energy spectrum and d the Fourier spectral energy percentage of center ring
The Pearson correlation coefficients (r) of LAI with reflectance and VI
| R550nm | R670nm | R720nm | R800nm | CIrededge | CIgreen | NDVI | NDRE | VARI | MTCI | EVI2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | − 0.64** | − 0.75** | − 0.38** | 0.77** | 0.67** | 0.52** | 0.79** | 0.74** | 0.68** | 0.67** | 0.79** |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)
Fig. 4The result of regression analysis of LAI with R670nm, R800nm, NDVI and EVI2
Fig. 5The origin images and their corresponding energy spectrum. The simulated images with a narrow stripe and b wide stripe, the actual UAV image of rice plot taken on c February 4th and d March 9th. e–h are the corresponding energy spectrum images of a, b, c, d respectively
The Pearson correlation coefficients of LAI with FSEP based on reflectance and VI images
| FSEP-R550nm | FSEP-R670nm | FSEP-R720nm | FSEP-R800nm | FSEP-CIrededge | FSEP-CIgreen | FSEP-NDVI | FSEP-NDRE | FSEP-VARI | FSEP-MTCI | FSEP-EVI2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | − 0.18** | − 0.23** | − 0.34** | 0.75** | 0.77** | 0.68** | 0.82** | 0.80** | 0.76** | 0.70** | 0.83** |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)
Fig. 6The result of regression analysis of LAI with FSEP-EVI2, FSEP-NDVI and FSEP-R800nm
The assessment of LAI estimation model established with different input parameters by SVR
| Input parameter | Type | RMSE | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| R550nm, R670nm, R720nm,R800nm | Spectral feature | 1.32 | 0.70** |
| R550nm, R670nm, R800nm | 1.30 | 0.71** | |
| NDRE,VARI,EVI2 | 1.37 | 0.66** | |
| R550nm,EVI2 | 1.29 | 0.72** | |
| FSEP- NDRE,FSEP-VARI,FSEP-EVI2 | Texture feature | 1.23 | 0.76** |
| FSEP– R550nm,FSEP–EVI2 | 1.22 | 0.75** |
** F-test statistical significance at 0.01 probability level
Fig. 7The relationship between estimated LAI and measured LAI