Elizabeth Hoon1, Carlee Ruediger2,3, Tiffany K Gill2, Rachel J Black2,4, Catherine L Hill2,3,4. 1. School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. 2. Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. 3. Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia. 4. Rheumatology Unit, The Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine patient experiences of glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of PMR or GCA were invited to participate in this qualitative study that used focus groups to explore: symptoms onset, process of diagnosis, treatment, adverse effects (AEs), and ongoing condition/s management. Data were transcribed verbatim and a "framework" approach was used for analysis and interpretation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients participated. Weight gain, changes in face and neck shape, and bruising were commonly reported and impacts of these AEs on quality of life were highlighted. Dealing with uncertainties associated with long-term experiences of the condition/s and cycles of GC treatment were raised as were workload demands for patients in managing both the condition and other people's expectations and recommendations related to GC therapy. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that the patient experience of GC use is poorly captured by usual physician monitoring for GC AEs. These findings suggest that development of a patient-reported outcome instrument for inflammatory conditions treated with GCs is required.
OBJECTIVE: To determine patient experiences of glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of PMR or GCA were invited to participate in this qualitative study that used focus groups to explore: symptoms onset, process of diagnosis, treatment, adverse effects (AEs), and ongoing condition/s management. Data were transcribed verbatim and a "framework" approach was used for analysis and interpretation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients participated. Weight gain, changes in face and neck shape, and bruising were commonly reported and impacts of these AEs on quality of life were highlighted. Dealing with uncertainties associated with long-term experiences of the condition/s and cycles of GC treatment were raised as were workload demands for patients in managing both the condition and other people's expectations and recommendations related to GC therapy. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that the patient experience of GC use is poorly captured by usual physician monitoring for GC AEs. These findings suggest that development of a patient-reported outcome instrument for inflammatory conditions treated with GCs is required.
Authors: Rachel J Black; Joanna C Robson; Susan M Goodman; Elizabeth Hoon; Lana Y H Lai; Lee S Simon; Eileen Harrison; Lorna Neill; Pam Richards; Linda M Nelsen; J Michael Nebesky; Sarah L Mackie; Catherine L Hill Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: J A P Da Silva; J W G Jacobs; J R Kirwan; M Boers; K G Saag; L B S Inês; E J P de Koning; F Buttgereit; M Cutolo; H Capell; R Rau; J W J Bijlsma Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-08-17 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: J N Hoes; J W G Jacobs; S M M Verstappen; J W J Bijlsma; G J M G Van der Heijden Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 19.103