Literature DB >> 31695211

A small proton charge radius from an electron-proton scattering experiment.

W Xiong1, A Gasparian2, H Gao1, D Dutta3, M Khandaker4, N Liyanage5, E Pasyuk6, C Peng1, X Bai5, L Ye7, K Gnanvo5, C Gu1, M Levillain8, X Yan1, D W Higinbotham6, M Meziane1, Z Ye1,9, K Adhikari7, B Aljawrneh8, H Bhatt7, D Bhetuwal7, J Brock6, V Burkert6, C Carlin6, A Deur6, D Di5, J Dunne7, P Ekanayaka7, L El-Fassi7, B Emmich7, L Gan10, O Glamazdin11, M L Kabir7, A Karki7, C Keith6, S Kowalski12, V Lagerquist13, I Larin14,15, T Liu1, A Liyanage16, J Maxwell6, D Meekins6, S J Nazeer16, V Nelyubin5, H Nguyen5, R Pedroni8, C Perdrisat17, J Pierce6, V Punjabi18, M Shabestari7, A Shahinyan19, R Silwal12, S Stepanyan6, A Subedi7, V V Tarasov14, N Ton5, Y Zhang1, Z W Zhao1.   

Abstract

Elastic electron-proton scattering (e-p) and the spectroscopy of hydrogen atoms are the two methods traditionally used to determine the proton charge radius, rp. In 2010, a new method using muonic hydrogen atoms1 found a substantial discrepancy compared with previous results2, which became known as the 'proton radius puzzle'. Despite experimental and theoretical efforts, the puzzle remains unresolved. In fact, there is a discrepancy between the two most recent spectroscopic measurements conducted on ordinary hydrogen3,4. Here we report on the proton charge radius experiment at Jefferson Laboratory (PRad), a high-precision e-p experiment that was established after the discrepancy was identified. We used a magnetic-spectrometer-free method along with a windowless hydrogen gas target, which overcame several limitations of previous e-p experiments and enabled measurements at very small forward-scattering angles. Our result, rp = 0.831 ± 0.007stat ± 0.012syst femtometres, is smaller than the most recent high-precision e-p measurement5 and 2.7 standard deviations smaller than the average of all e-p experimental results6. The smaller rp we have now measured supports the value found by two previous muonic hydrogen experiments1,7. In addition, our finding agrees with the revised value (announced in 2019) for the Rydberg constant8-one of the most accurately evaluated fundamental constants in physics.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31695211     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  8 in total

1.  Exotic helium atom lit up.

Authors:  Niels Madsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Measured proton electromagnetic structure deviates from theoretical predictions.

Authors:  R Li; N Sparveris; H Atac; M K Jones; M Paolone; Z Akbar; C Ayerbe Gayoso; V Berdnikov; D Biswas; M Boer; A Camsonne; J-P Chen; M Diefenthaler; B Duran; D Dutta; D Gaskell; O Hansen; F Hauenstein; N Heinrich; W Henry; T Horn; G M Huber; S Jia; S Joosten; A Karki; S J D Kay; V Kumar; X Li; W B Li; A H Liyanage; S Malace; P Markowitz; M McCaughan; Z-E Meziani; H Mkrtchyan; C Morean; M Muhoza; A Narayan; B Pasquini; M Rehfuss; B Sawatzky; G R Smith; A Smith; R Trotta; C Yero; X Zheng; J Zhou
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  How big is the proton? Particle-size puzzle leaps closer to resolution.

Authors:  Davide Castelvecchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Probing the internal structure of baryons.

Authors:  Guangshun Huang; Rinaldo Baldini Ferroli
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 17.275

Review 5.  Excited states in nucleon structure calculations.

Authors:  Konstantin Ottnad
Journal:  Eur Phys J A Hadron Nucl       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.043

6.  Measuring the α-particle charge radius with muonic helium-4 ions.

Authors:  Julian J Krauth; Karsten Schuhmann; Marwan Abdou Ahmed; Fernando D Amaro; Pedro Amaro; François Biraben; Tzu-Ling Chen; Daniel S Covita; Andreas J Dax; Marc Diepold; Luis M P Fernandes; Beatrice Franke; Sandrine Galtier; Andrea L Gouvea; Johannes Götzfried; Thomas Graf; Theodor W Hänsch; Jens Hartmann; Malte Hildebrandt; Paul Indelicato; Lucile Julien; Klaus Kirch; Andreas Knecht; Yi-Wei Liu; Jorge Machado; Cristina M B Monteiro; Françoise Mulhauser; Boris Naar; Tobias Nebel; François Nez; Joaquim M F Dos Santos; José Paulo Santos; Csilla I Szabo; David Taqqu; João F C A Veloso; Jan Vogelsang; Andreas Voss; Birgit Weichelt; Randolf Pohl; Aldo Antognini; Franz Kottmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Measurement of the neutron charge radius and the role of its constituents.

Authors:  H Atac; M Constantinou; Z-E Meziani; M Paolone; N Sparveris
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Intense beam of metastable Muonium.

Authors:  G Janka; B Ohayon; Z Burkley; L Gerchow; N Kuroda; X Ni; R Nishi; Z Salman; A Suter; M Tuzi; C Vigo; T Prokscha; P Crivelli
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.590

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.