| Literature DB >> 31695063 |
Pernille Barkholt1,2, Kristoffer T G Rigbolt3, Mechthilde Falkenhahn4, Thomas Hübschle4, Uwe Schwahn4, Maria Luisa Fernandez-Cachon4, Thorsten Schmidt4, Stefan Theis4, Henrik H Hansen3, Anders Hay-Schmidt5, Philip J Pedersen3, Niels Vrang3, Jacob Jelsing3.
Abstract
The central mechanisms underlying the marked beneficial metabolic effects of bariatric surgery are unclear. Here, we characterized global gene expression in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (Arc) in diet-induced obese (DIO) rats following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). 60 days post-RYGB, the Arc was isolated by laser-capture microdissection and global gene expression was assessed by RNA sequencing. RYGB lowered body weight and adiposity as compared to sham-operated DIO rats. Discrete transcriptome changes were observed in the Arc following RYGB, including differential expression of genes associated with inflammation and neuropeptide signaling. RYGB reduced gene expression of glial cell markers, including Gfap, Aif1 and Timp1, confirmed by a lower number of GFAP immunopositive astrocyte profiles in the Arc. Sham-operated weight-matched rats demonstrated a similar glial gene expression signature, suggesting that RYGB and dietary restriction have common effects on hypothalamic gliosis. Considering that RYGB surgery also led to increased orexigenic and decreased anorexigenic gene expression, this may signify increased hunger-associated signaling at the level of the Arc. Hence, induction of counterregulatory molecular mechanisms downstream from the Arc may play an important role in RYGB-induced weight loss.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31695063 PMCID: PMC6834618 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52257-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Laser-capture microdissection of the Arc. (A) Illustration of workflow from sectioning of brains collecting series of hypothalamic sections through cresyl violet staining to laser capture microdissection (LCM) of the Arc and RNA purification; adapted from Paulsen et al.[49]. (B) Hypothalamic section before and after LCM of the Arc.
In vivo endpoints and plasma hormone levels.
| DIO-Sham | DIO-RYGB | DIO-WM | |
|---|---|---|---|
4 weeks of HPHF feeding prior to surgery (4w DIO) | |||
| Pre-surgical body weight (g) | 360 ± 7 | 409 ± 16 | — |
| Terminal body weight (g) | 522 ± 19 | 442 ± 16** | — |
Body weight change relative to day-1 (%) | 153 ± 6 | 110 ± 4*** | — |
| Cumulated chow intake (g) | 160 ± 43 | 448 ± 76** | — |
| Cumulated HPHF diet intake (g) | 912 ± 42 | 768 ± 69* | — |
| Cumulated energy intake (kJ) | 23 777 ± 627 | 23 756 ± 1374 | — |
| Pre-surgical fat mass (g) | 35 ± 3 | 53 ± 6* | — |
| Terminal fat mass (g) | 98 ± 10 | 45 ± 3*** | — |
| Pre-surgical lean mass (g) | 289 ± 5 | 341 ± 16* | — |
| Terminal lean mass (g) | 371 ± 7 | 373 ± 17 | — |
|
| |||
| Pre-surgical body weight (g) | 728 ± 22 | 745 ± 23 | 762 ± 27 |
| Terminal body weight (g) | 725 ± 20 | 620 ± 15** | 636 ± 21* |
Body weight change relative to day-1 (%) | 99.7 ± 1.1 | 83.4 ± 0.9*** | 83.5 ± 0.4*** |
| Cumulated chow intake (g) | 51 ± 10 | 267 ± 42*** | 163 ± 5*/^ |
| Cumulated HPHF diet intake (g) | 826 ± 26 | 861 ± 66 | 538 ± 16***/^^^ |
| Cumulated energy intake (kJ) | 20 420 ± 586 | 23 818 ± 1 506 | 14 856 ± 418***/^^^ |
| Pre-surgical fat mass (g) | 220 ± 23 | 224 ± 20 | 248 ± 13 |
| Terminal fat mass (g) | 222 ± 22 | 147 ± 18* | 160 ± 9* |
| Pre-surgical lean mass (g) | 475 ± 8 | 493 ± 9 | 467 ± 13 |
| Terminal lean mass (g) | 489 ± 12 | 475 ± 8 | 452 ± 11* |
| Leptin (pg/mL) | 4218 ± 413 | 2716 ± 277** | 3209 ± 204 |
| C-peptide (pg/mL) | 1269 ± 118 | 807 ± 51** | 846 ± 61* |
| GLP-1 total (pg/mL) | 8.2 ± 1.1 | 44.9 ± 7.8*** | 7.9 ± 4.4^^^ |
| GLP-1 active (pg/mL) | 0.61 ± 0.7 | 3.28 ± 0.5** | Below LOD |
| PYY (pg/mL) | 21 ± 2 | 138 ± 16*** | 18 ± 1^^^ |
| Ghrelin (pg/mL) | 146 ± 27 | 145 ± 28 | 234 ± 15*/^ |
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and weight-matching (WM) led to a significant reduction in plasma leptin levels compared to sham-operated controls. RYGB led to an increase in the plasma levels of gut-derived hormones GLP-1 (total and active) and PYY relative to both sham and Sham-WM, whereas only Sham-WM showed significantly increased plasma levels of ghrelin. LOD, level of detection (active GLP-1 was below detection level in sham-WM animals (0.24 pg/mL)). Cumulated energy intake includes chow and high palatable high fat (HPHF) diet consumption over the course of the experiments. Data on body weight and body composition in the 4w DIO rat study have previously been reported[16]. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 vs sham, **p < 0.01 vs sham, ***p < 0.001 vs sham; ^p < 0.05 vs RYGB, ^^^p < 0.001 vs RYGB (Student’s unpaired t-test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test).
Differentially expressed genes in the n. arcuatus of RYGB-operated DIO rats.
| Ensembl ID | Gene | Function | 4w DIO-RYGB | 12w DIO-RYGB | Combined | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPKM | Ratio | Raw | FDR | RPKM | Ratio | Raw | FDR | Raw | FDR | |||
|
| ||||||||||||
| ENSRNOG00000002919 | Gfap | Astroglial cell morphology | 429 | 0.38 | 1.37E-09 | 1.02E-05 | 428 | 0.73 | 5.08E-06 | 5.46E-02 | 2.34E-13 | 1.52E-09 |
| ENSRNOG00000010208 | Timp1 | Extracellular matrix remodeling, cell migration | 47 | 0.44 | 2.25E-07 | 1.11E-03 | 22 | 0.82 | 4.99E-03 | 8.00E-01 | 2.43E-08 | 6.71E-05 |
| ENSRNOG00000010805 | Fabp4 | Fatty acid trafficking, inflammation | 2.0 | 0.07 | 8.19E-11 | 1.22E-06 | 0.2 | 0.49 | 1.19E-01 | 9.95E-01 | 3.06E-07 | 1.94E-03 |
| ENSRNOG00000016043 | Aqp4 | Astrocyte water homeostasis | 300 | 0.67 | 2.57E-04 | 1.69E-01 | 905 | 0.85 | 7.91E-04 | 3.92E-01 | 3.33E-06 | 3.62E-03 |
| ENSRNOG00000000814 | Fabp7 | Fatty acid trafficking, glial cell proliferation | 296 | 0.56 | 3.36E-05 | 4.54E-02 | 81 | 0.88 | 8.89E-03 | 8.00E-01 | 4.80E-06 | 4.47E-03 |
| ENSRNOG00000013654 | Cbln2 | Synapse assembly | 28 | 0.66 | 2.58E-03 | 4.79E-01 | 33 | 0.80 | 1.59E-04 | 2.67E-01 | 6.44E-06 | 5.25E-03 |
| ENSRNOG00000007457 | Serping1 | Regulation of complement cascade | 13 | 0.57 | 3.73E-03 | 5.33E-01 | 15 | 0.78 | 1.87E-04 | 2.67E-01 | 1.06E-05 | 6.92E-03 |
| ENSRNOG00000058906 | Ptprh | Regulation of cell growth | 0.6 | 0.25 | 2.50E-06 | 6.19E-03 | 2.0 | 0.92 | 5.54E-01 | 9.95E-01 | 2.01E-05 | 1.19E-02 |
| ENSRNOG00000023546 | Hspb1 | Regulation of cell growth | 8.3 | 0.46 | 5.81E-05 | 5.51E-02 | 4.8 | 0.82 | 2.75E-02 | 8.98E-01 | 2.29E-05 | 1.25E-02 |
| ENSRNOG00000006735 | Cdkn2b | Regulation of cell growth | 1.3 | 0.38 | 1.99E-06 | 5.51E-02 | 3.4 | 0.84 | 1.88E-01 | 9.95E-01 | 5.90E-06 | 1.55E-02 |
| ENSRNOG00000014797 | Tmbim1 | Extracellular matrix remodeling, cell migration | 29 | 0.66 | 2.15E-05 | 3.78E-02 | 26 | 0.94 | 1.28E-01 | 9.63E-01 | 3.81E-05 | 1.78E-02 |
| ENSRNOG00000008609 | Capn3 | Extracellular matrix remodeling, cell migration | 3.0 | 0.49 | 1.29E-04 | 1.01E-01 | 6.7 | 0.85 | 3.17E-02 | 9.00E-01 | 5.50E-05 | 2.39E-02 |
| ENSRNOG00000017987 | Ucma | Extracellular matrix remodeling, cell migration | 12 | 0.41 | 9.79E-06 | 5.51E-02 | 2.4 | 0.75 | 1.51E-01 | 9.95E-01 | 2.14E-05 | 3.74E-02 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| ENSRNOG00000019422 | Egr1 | Transcription factor | 17 | 4.28 | 4.45E-07 | 1.65E-03 | 35 | 1.48 | 3.25E-03 | 6.70E-01 | 3.09E-08 | 6.71E-05 |
| ENSRNOG00000039001 | Agrp | Appetite stimulation | 185 | 1.53 | 5.68E-03 | 6.68E-01 | 55 | 1.93 | 1.84E-05 | 8.83E-02 | 1.78E-06 | 2.90E-03 |
| ENSRNOG00000000640 | Egr2 | Transcription factor | 0.7 | 3.17 | 2.29E-05 | 3.78E-02 | 3.1 | 1.59 | 8.26E-03 | 8.00E-01 | 3.11E-06 | 3.62E-03 |
| ENSRNOG00000002793 | Sstr2 | Hormone secretion, regulation of cell growth | 6.0 | 1.79 | 1.98E-06 | 5.89E-03 | 14 | 1.06 | 3.39E-01 | 9.95E-01 | 9.99E-06 | 6.92E-03 |
| ENSRNOG00000007830 | Apold1 | Endothelial cell signaling | 1.7 | 2.83 | 1.96E-05 | 3.78E-02 | 4.8 | 1.19 | 1.17E-01 | 9.59E-01 | 3.22E-05 | 1.62E-02 |
| ENSRNOG00000005964 | Nr4a3 | Nuclear receptor | 2.8 | 2.14 | 2.87E-05 | 4.27E-02 | 16.6 | 1.09 | 1.62E-01 | 9.70E-01 | 6.16E-05 | 2.51E-02 |
| ENSRNOG00000007637 | Acer2 | Ceramide metabolism | 4.8 | 1.45 | 2.16E-02 | 9.01E-01 | 27.5 | 1.28 | 3.51E-04 | 2.67E-01 | 9.72E-05 | 3.52E-02 |
| ENSRNOG00000007607 | Nr4a1 | Nuclear receptor | 2.7 | 3.07 | 2.67E-04 | 1.69E-01 | 5.4 | 1.33 | 4.09E-02 | 9.00E-01 | 1.36E-04 | 4.66E-02 |
Arcuate transcriptome analysis was performed 60 days following RYGB. Data are shown for individual experiments as well as following combined analysis. Combined statistical analysis of RNAseq data from both 4w DIO and 12w DIO rats indicated differential gene expression (FDR <0.05) of 21 genes (downregulated, n = 13; upregulated, n = 8) following RYGB, as compared to sham-operated controls. Genes are ranked according to combined FDR value. Gene expression level of individual genes is indicated by RPKM value. Ratio indicates gene expression level following RYGB surgery relative to corresponding sham group (RYGB/sham).
Figure 2Reduced expression of inflammatory marker genes after RYGB. (A) Network analysis of all genes with raw p-values below 0.01 demonstrated several genes specific for glia cells as well as the complement immune system to be downregulated in RYGB-operated DIO (DIO-RYGB) rats relative to sham-operated DIO (DIO-sham) rats. (B) Expression levels of glia cell marker genes were downregulated following RYGB surgery in both studies (scale bar, 20 µm). (C) The transcription factor Egr1 was upregulated in both 4w and 12w DIO-RYGB rats. (D) Expression levels are presented as mean reads per kilobase million (RPKM) ±SEM; statistical analysis was performed using EdgeR presented with raw p-values; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (D) The number of GFAP-positive astroglia profiles was significantly downregulated in 4w DIO-RYGB relative to 4w DIO-sham controls. Representative micrographs of GFAP-immunostained sections from sham-operated and RYGB-operated animals with arrowheads identifying astrocytes; scalebar equal to 20 µm in inserts. GFAP-positive cell counts are presented as mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 (Student’s unpaired t-test). Gene names: Aif1, Allograft inflammatory factor 1; Anxa2, Annexin A2; Anxa5, Annexin A5; Arpc1b, Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B; Aqp4, Aquaporin 4; C1s, Complement component 1s; C1qb, Complement component 1q B chain; Egr1, Early growth response protein 1 (also known as Zif268); Gfap, Glial fibrillary acidic protein; S100B, S100 calcium-binding protein B; Lgals1, Galectin-1 (lectin, galactose binding, soluble 1); Serping1, Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade G (C1 inhibitor) member 1; Timp1, Tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease 1.
Figure 3Differential expression of arcuate neuropeptide genes related to hunger and satiety signaling. Orexigenic AgRP (A) and NPY (B) mRNAs were elevated after RYGB in both studies relative to sham controls. Anorexigenic CART (C) and POMC (D) mRNAs were reduced in RYGB following 4 weeks, but not 12 weeks of pre-feeding. Statistical analysis was performed using EdgeR with raw p-values; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to corresponding sham control group. (E) The increased ratio between the expression level of orexigenic and anorexigenic genes suggests an orexigenic signaling state following RYGB compared to sham surgery; ***p < 0.01 compared with sham (student’s unpaired t-test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test). Data is presented as mean ± SEM.