Literature DB >> 31694966

Prospective Evaluation of Molecular Assays for Diagnosis of Vaginitis.

Sandra S Richter1, Joshua Otiso1, Oluwatosin J Goje2, Sherilynn Vogel1, Jory Aebly1, George Keller1, Hillary Van Heule1, Danielle Wehn2, Amy L Stephens2, Salena Zanotti2, Tricia Johnson1, Sixto M Leal3, Gary W Procop4.   

Abstract

Molecular tests to diagnose conditions involving the disruption of normal microbiota are difficult to optimize. Using Nugent-scored Gram stain (NS) as the reference standard, we evaluated the performance of 3 molecular assays for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and examined the impact of an incremental increase in bacterial targets. The BD Affirm assay includes a DNA probe for Gardnerella vaginalis, the Hologic transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) analyte-specific reagent (ASR) assay adds a second Lactobacillus sp. target, and the recently cleared in vitro diagnostic use (IVD) Aptima BV assay includes a third target (Atopobium vaginae). The diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) by the Affirm and Candida vaginitis Hologic TMA ASR assays was assessed using microscopy for yeast as the reference standard. From May to December 2018, 111 women with vaginitis symptoms prompting the clinician to order an Affirm test were enrolled with informed consent for the collection of additional specimens. Clinicians accurately predicted BV as the most likely diagnosis for 71% of the 45 patients with BV. Coinfection occurred in 13.5% of patients. For BV, the specificity of the Aptima IVD assay (86.3%) was higher than the Affirm assay (60.6%, P = 0.0002), but sensitivities were not significantly different. For VVC, the sensitivity of the ASR assay (100%) was higher than Affirm (75.9%; P = 0.023) and the specificity of the Affirm assay (98.8%) was higher than the ASR assay (86.6%; P = 0.004).
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  molecular; vaginitis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31694966      PMCID: PMC6935898          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01264-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  14 in total

1.  Affirm VP III in the detection and identification of Candida species in vaginitis.

Authors:  G Petrikkos; K Makrilakis; S Pappas
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Natural history of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis in a high-risk group of women.

Authors:  Jane R Schwebke; Renee Desmond
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  David N Fredricks; Tina L Fiedler; Jeanne M Marrazzo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Harold C Wiesenfeld; Sharon L Hillier; Marijane A Krohn; Daniel V Landers; Richard L Sweet
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Is bacterial vaginosis a stronger risk factor for preterm birth when it is diagnosed earlier in gestation?

Authors:  Mark A Klebanoff; Sharon L Hillier; Robert P Nugent; Cora A MacPherson; John C Hauth; J Christopher Carey; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Wayne Trout; Atef Moawad; Kenneth J Leveno; Menachem Miodovnik; Baha M Sibai; J Peter Vandorsten; Mitchell P Dombrowski; Mary J O'Sullivan; Michael Varner; Oded Langer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Mark A Klebanoff; Jane R Schwebke; Jun Zhang; Tonja R Nansel; Kai-Fun Yu; William W Andrews
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.

Authors:  R Amsel; P A Totten; C A Spiegel; K C Chen; D Eschenbach; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Menard; Florence Fenollar; Mireille Henry; Florence Bretelle; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Diagnostic Performance of a Molecular Test versus Clinician Assessment of Vaginitis.

Authors:  Jane R Schwebke; Charlotte A Gaydos; Paul Nyirjesy; Sonia Paradis; Salma Kodsi; Charles K Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  1 in total

1.  Log (Lactobacillus crispatus/ Gardnerella vaginalis): a new indicator of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Tongyang Deng; Anquan Shang; Ying Zheng; Lianzhen Zhang; Hong Sun; Wei Wang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 3.269

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.