| Literature DB >> 31693850 |
Seung-Wook No1, Duk Hyun Sung2, Du Hwan Kim1.
Abstract
It is difficult to distinguish Hirayama disease (HD) from other mimicking disorders in adolescent patients with distal upper limb weakness. The prevailing theory of HD postulates that the lower cervical cord is susceptible to compression during neck flexion because of insufficient growth of the dura relative to the spinal column. Confirmation of a dynamic change in the dorsal epidural space on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during neck flexion is essential for diagnosing HD. However, neck flexion MRI has not been routinely performed in juvenile patients with distal upper limb weakness in the absence of suspected HD. We report two cases of HD that were initially confused with other diseases because of insufficient or absent cervical flexion during MRI. Full-flexion MRI showed typical findings of HD in both cases. Our cases suggest that dynamic cervical MRI in the fully flexed position is necessary for evaluating suspected HD.Entities:
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Monomelic amyotrophy; Myelopathy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31693850 PMCID: PMC6835133 DOI: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.5.615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Rehabil Med ISSN: 2234-0645
Fig. 1.(A, B) T2-weighted cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the neutral position revealed no signal change or spinal cord atrophy. (C, D) Contrast-enhanced MRI in the suboptimal neck-flexion position did not show dural detachment from the adjacent lamina. (E) Sagittal contrast-enhanced MRI in the fully flexed position demonstrated a crescent-shaped enlarged posterior epidural space (arrow). (F) Axial contrast-enhanced MRI in the fully flexed position revealed right dural sac detachment from the lamina and spinal cord compression by the engorged posterior epidural venous plexus (arrow).
Fig. 2.Upper-arm magnetic resonance imaging revealed hyperintensity and swelling of the median (asterisk) and ulnar (arrow) nerves in the axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed turbo spin-echo sequence image.
Electrodiagnostic study in Case 1
| Right side | Left side | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lat (ms) | Amp | CV (m/s) | Lat (ms) | Amp | CV (m/s) | |
| Sensory | ||||||
| Median (index finger) | 2.45 | 104.5 | - | 2.40 | 90.4 | - |
| Ulnar (little finger) | 2.00 | 95.3 | - | 2.25 | 76.4 | - |
| Radial (thumb) | 1.70 | 31.4 | - | 1.70 | 32.9 | - |
| Lateral antebrachial (forearm) | 1.35 | 12.7 | - | 1.45 | 45.5 | - |
| Motor | ||||||
| Median (APB) | 3.65 | 11.6 | 59.0 | 3.25 | 14.4 | 61.8 |
| Ulnar (ADM) | 3.40 | 5.3 | 49.4 | 2.60 | 13.0 | 56.0 |
| Radial (EIP) | 2.15 | 3.3 | - | 2.00 | 7.9 | - |
| Needle EMG | ||||||
| Right deltoid | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right triceps | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right biceps | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right FCR | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right FCU | Increased | +1 | +1 | + | N | Reduced |
| Right EDC | Increased | +1 | +1 | + | N | Reduced |
| Right APB | Increased | +1 | +1 | + | N | N |
| Right FDI | Increased | +1 | +1 | + | N | Reduced |
| Right cervical paraspinalis | N | - | - | - | N | N |
Amplitudes are measured in millivolt (mV, motor) and in microvolt (μV, sensory).
CV, conduction velocity; APB, abductor pollicis brevis; ADM, abductor digiti minimi; EIP, extensor incidis propirus; EMG, electromyography; IA, insertional activity; Fib, fibrillation potential; PSW, positive sharp wave; Poly, polyphasic motor unit; FCR, flexor carpi radialis; FCU, flexor carpi ulnaris; EDC, extensor digitorum communis; FDI, first dorsal interosseous; N, normal.
Fig. 3.(A) Cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the neutral position showed disc protrusion at C5-6 and C6-7 in the sagittal T2-weighted image. (B) Cervical MRI with neck flexion revealed suspected dural detachment from the lamina (arrow). (C) Cervical MRI with full flexion demonstrated obvious widening of the dorsal epidural space with flattening of the cervical cord (arrow).
A summary of initial and follow-up electrodiagnostic study in Case 2
| Right side | Left side | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lat (ms) | Amp | CV (m/s) | Lat (ms) | Amp | CV (m/s) | |
| Sensory | ||||||
| Median (index finger) | 2.45 | 60.8 | - | 2.40 | 59.5 | - |
| Ulnar (little finger) | 2.25 | 50.3 | - | 2.15 | 46.7 | - |
| Radial (thumb) | 1.85 | 34.7 | - | 2.10 | 25.5 | - |
| Lateral antebrachial (forearm) | 1.10 | 23.5 | - | 1.15 | 20.1 | - |
| Medial antebrachial (forearm) | 0.95 | 10.7 | - | 1.15 | 10.9 | - |
| Motor | ||||||
| Median (APB) | 3.45 | 12.2 | 64.0 | 3.30 | 11.4 | 55.2 |
| Ulnar (ADM) | 2.75 | 7.4 | 62.5 | 2.25 | 11.4 | 61.0 |
| Radial (EIP) | 3.40 | 1.4 | - | 2.05 | 7.1 | - |
| MC (biceps) | 4.15 | 7.4 | - | 4.45 | 7.1 | - |
| Axillary (deltoid) | 2.15 | 15.3 | - | 2.60 | 15.5 | - |
| Suprascapular (SSP) | 2.00 | 8.2 | - | 2.35 | 5.6 | - |
| Needle EMG | ||||||
| Right deltoid | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right triceps | Increased | +1 | +2 | + | N | Reduced |
| Right biceps | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right brachioradialis | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right FCR | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right ECR | Increased | +1 | +1 | + | N | Reduced |
| Right FCU | N | - | +1 | + | N | Reduced |
| Right EDC | Increased | +1 | +2 | + | N | Reduced |
| Right EIP | Increased | +1 | +1 | + | N | Reduced |
| Right APB | N | - | - | + | N | N |
| Right ADM | N | - | - | - | N | N |
| Right FDI | Increased | +1 | +1 | - | N | Reduced |
| Right cervical paraspinalis | N | - | - | - | N | N |
Amplitudes are measured in millivolt (mV, motor) and in microvolt (μV, sensory).
CV, conduction velocity; APB, abductor pollicis brevis; ADM, abductor digiti minimi; EIP, extensor incidis propirus; EMG, electromyography; IA, insertional activity; Fib, fibrillation potential; PSW, positive sharp wave; Poly, polyphasic motor unit; FCR, flexor carpi radialis; ECR, extensor carpi radialis; FCU, flexor carpi ulnaris; EDC, extensor digitorum communis; EIP, extensor incidis propirus; APB, abductor pollicis brevis; ADM, abductor digiti minimi; FDI, first dorsal interosseous; N, normal.