Literature DB >> 31693558

The Use of Closing Questions in Qualitative Research: Results of a Web-Based Survey.

Timothy Joseph Sowicz1, Justine S Sefcik, Helen L Teng, Elliane Irani, Terri-Ann Kelly, Christine Bradway.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scarce and differing reasons for including closing questions in qualitative research exist, but how data generated from these questions are used remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to understand if and how researchers use closing questions in qualitative research, specifically the research questions were: (a) "Why do qualitative researchers include or exclude closing questions during interviews?" and (b) "How do qualitative researchers use data from closing questions?"
METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design using a single, asynchronous, web-based, investigator-designed survey containing 14 items was used to collect data. Convenience and snowball sampling were used to recruit participants. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Codes were developed from the qualitative data. Subcategories were derived from similar codes, and these subcategories were further scrutinized and were used to create broad categories.
RESULTS: The number of respondents per question ranged from 76 to 99; most identified nursing and sociology as their academic disciplines, lived in the United States, and were involved in qualitative research for 1-10 years. Data, the interview, the interviewee, and the interviewer were broad categories to emerge as reasons for including closing questions. Only one respondent reported a reason for excluding closing questions. The uses of closing question data were described in four broad categories: analysis, data, the interview guide, and inquiry. DISCUSSION: Researchers frequently included closing questions in qualitative studies. The reasons for including these questions and how data are used vary, and support limited previously published literature. One unique reason, adding "new breath" to the interview, emerged. Study findings can aid qualitative researchers in deciding whether to include closing questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31693558      PMCID: PMC6852793          DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.

Authors:  U H Graneheim; B Lundman
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Semi-structured interviewing in practice-close research.

Authors:  Jennifer Baumbusch
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.260

3.  Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers.

Authors:  Lisa S Whiting
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2008 Feb 13-19

4.  Confusing categories and themes.

Authors:  Janice M Morse
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2008-06

5.  Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.

Authors:  Janice M Morse
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-07-16

6.  Co-creation of a pedagogical space to support qualitative inquiry: An advanced qualitative collective.

Authors:  Sarah Abboud; Su Kyung Kim; Sara Jacoby; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Terease Waite; Elizabeth Froh; Justine S Sefcik; Hyejin Kim; Timothy Joseph Sowicz; Terri-Ann Kelly; Sarah Kagan
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.