Emily J Jones1, Emily Haozous, Laura S Larsson, Margaret P Moss. 1. Emily J. Jones, PhD, RNC-OB, is Associate Professor, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston. Emily Haozous, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Senior Research Scientist, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Laura S. Larsson, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor, Montana State University, College of Nursing, Bozeman. Margaret P. Moss, PhD, JD, RN, FAAN, is Associate Professor, University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Certain research principles, framed within an indigenous context, are helpful guideposts to practice ethical, relevant, and sensitive inquiries. It is essential to further adapt research approaches based on the unique geographical, sociopolitical, and cultural attributes of partnering tribal communities. These adaptations are largely shaped by trial and error. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to offer the prospective novice nurse researcher lessons that we learned when entering Indian country to conduct research for the first time. As indigenous and nonindigenous researchers, we are not seeking to set down a methodology but rather offer a list of processes, environments, timelines, and barriers that we never learned in didactic, seminar, clinical, practicum, or any other academic setting. METHODS: We organized a set of memories and thoughts through a series of semistructured iterative sessions specific to our first encounters as researchers in Indian country. We compiled our written responses and field notes from our dialogue, interpreted these data, and organized them into themes. We have reported what we felt would be the most surprising, frequent, or important information to note. RESULTS: We identified three overarching themes in our collective experience: orientation and negotiation, situating ourselves and our work, and navigating our way. Subthemes included perceiving ourselves as outsiders, negotiating distance and time realities, relying on the goodness of gatekeepers, shaping research questions per community priorities, honing our cross-cultural and intercultural communication skills, discovering the many layers of tribal approval processes, and developing sensibilities and intuition. DISCUSSION: Our previous experiences as novices leading research projects in Indian country have produced unique sensibilities that may serve to guide nurse researchers who seek to partner with tribal communities.
BACKGROUND: Certain research principles, framed within an indigenous context, are helpful guideposts to practice ethical, relevant, and sensitive inquiries. It is essential to further adapt research approaches based on the unique geographical, sociopolitical, and cultural attributes of partnering tribal communities. These adaptations are largely shaped by trial and error. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to offer the prospective novice nurse researcher lessons that we learned when entering Indian country to conduct research for the first time. As indigenous and nonindigenous researchers, we are not seeking to set down a methodology but rather offer a list of processes, environments, timelines, and barriers that we never learned in didactic, seminar, clinical, practicum, or any other academic setting. METHODS: We organized a set of memories and thoughts through a series of semistructured iterative sessions specific to our first encounters as researchers in Indian country. We compiled our written responses and field notes from our dialogue, interpreted these data, and organized them into themes. We have reported what we felt would be the most surprising, frequent, or important information to note. RESULTS: We identified three overarching themes in our collective experience: orientation and negotiation, situating ourselves and our work, and navigating our way. Subthemes included perceiving ourselves as outsiders, negotiating distance and time realities, relying on the goodness of gatekeepers, shaping research questions per community priorities, honing our cross-cultural and intercultural communication skills, discovering the many layers of tribal approval processes, and developing sensibilities and intuition. DISCUSSION: Our previous experiences as novices leading research projects in Indian country have produced unique sensibilities that may serve to guide nurse researchers who seek to partner with tribal communities.
Authors: Suzanne Christopher; Robin Saha; Paul Lachapelle; Derek Jennings; Yoshiko Colclough; Clarice Cooper; Crescentia Cummins; Margaret J Eggers; Kris Fourstar; Kari Harris; Sandra W Kuntz; Victoria Lafromboise; Deborah Laveaux; Tracie McDonald; James Real Bird; Elizabeth Rink; Lennie Webster Journal: Fam Community Health Date: 2011 Jul-Sep
Authors: Meredith S Shiels; Pavel Chernyavskiy; William F Anderson; Ana F Best; Emily A Haozous; Patricia Hartge; Philip S Rosenberg; David Thomas; Neal D Freedman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Patricia A Holkup; T Kim Rodehorst; Susan L Wilhelm; Sandra W Kuntz; Clarann Weinert; Mary Beth Flanders Stepans; Emily Matt Salois; Jacqueline Left Hand Bull; Wade G Hill Journal: J Transcult Nurs Date: 2008-10-23 Impact factor: 1.959
Authors: Ada Bends; Charlene Burns; Pearl Yellowman-Caye; Tammy Rider; Emily Matt Salois; Annette Sutherland; Mike Todd; Deb LaVeaux; Suzanne Christopher Journal: Pimatisiwin Date: 2013
Authors: Nicole R Tuitt; Umit Shrestha; Nicole Reed; Roland S Moore; Michelle Sarche; Carol E Kaufman Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2022