| Literature DB >> 31692876 |
Mercy Obasi1, Stephen Manortey1, Kofi Adesi Kyei2,3, Michael Kwabeng Addo3, Sharon Talboys1, Lynette Gay1, Frank Baiden1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Persons with disabilities have the same sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs as the abled people but they often face barriers to SRH information and services which are necessary for healthy and safe relationships, protection from HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This study sought to access the SRH services among adolescents with disabilities in four Special Needs Schools in Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; assessment; disability; reproductive health; sexual
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31692876 PMCID: PMC6815493 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.299.18546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Relationship of respondents with guardians
| Variables | Categories | Frequencies n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Parent | 246 (87.9) | |
| Other relatives | 14 (5.0) | |
| Non-relatives | 20 (7.1) | |
| Yes | 175 (71.1) | |
| No | 71 (28.9) | |
| Yes | 256 (91.4) | |
| No | 24 (8.6) | |
| Very easy | 70 (25.0) | |
| Easy | 99 (35.4) | |
| Average difficult | 32 (11.4) | |
| Very difficult | 70 (25.0) | |
| Do not see him/her | 9 (3.2) | |
| Studying/homework | 63 (22.5) | |
| Household chores | 90 (32.1) | |
| Helping with family business | 23 (8.2) | |
| Work to get money | 17 (6.1) | |
| Playing/Chatting with friends | 51 (18.2) | |
| Idling | 26 (9.3) | |
| Others | 10 (3.6) |
Data is presented in frequencies and percentages.
Sources: Field data, 2018
Sources of information on SRH among adolescents with disability (AWD)
| Order of Importance | Sources of information on SRH | Frequencies n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| School teachers | 179 (63.9) | |
| Parents | 34 (12.2) | |
| Siblings/Other family members | 7 (2.5) | |
| Friends | 29 (10.4) | |
| Health personnel | 1 (0.4) | |
| Media | 15 (5.4) | |
| Others | 15 (5.4) | |
| School teachers | 97 (34.6) | |
| Parents | 50 (17.9) | |
| Siblings/Other family members | 20 (7.1) | |
| Friends | 56 (20.0) | |
| Health personnel | 6 (2.1) | |
| Media | 29 (10.4) | |
| Others | 22 (7.9) |
Data is presented in frequencies and percentages. Sources: Field data, 2018
bivariate analysis of socio-demographic factors associated with knowledge among respondents
| Variables | Knowledge Scores | P-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good n (%) | Lown (%) | ||
| 15-17 | 92 (61.3) | 58 (38.7) | |
| 18-19 | 96 (73.9) | 34 (26.2) | |
| Male | 98 (69.5) | 43 (30.5) | 0.397 |
| Female | 90 (64.8) | 49 (35.3) | |
| Intellectual | 31 (62.0) | 19 (38.0) | |
| Hearing Impairment | 92 (63.0) | 54 (37.0) | 0.057 |
| Visual Impairment | 65 (77.4) | 19 (22.6) | |
| Basic | 140 (68.0) | 66(32.1) | |
| Secondary | 38 (70.4) | 16 (29.6) | 0.225 |
| Rehabilitation | 10 (50.0) | 10 (50.0) | |
| Christian | 173 (69.2) | 77 (30.8) | |
| Muslim | 15 (50.0) | 15 (50.0) | |
Test of association using chi-square
multivariate analysis of factors associated with knowledge among respondents
| Variables | Categories | P-Value | OR (95%) | P-Value | AOR (95%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15- 17 years | Ref | 1 | Ref | 1 | |
| Intellectual | Ref | 1 | Ref | 1 | |
| Hearing | 0.8984 | 1.04 (0.54-2.03) | 0.226 | 1.61 (0.75-3.46) | |
| Visual | 0.0570 | 2.10 (0.96-4.57) | 0.043 | 2.37 (1.03-5.49) | |
| Friends | Ref | 1 | Ref | 1 | |
| School teacher | < 0.0001 | 4.62 (1.98-10.80) | <0.001 | 4.46 (1.84-10.82) | |
| Relatives | 0.2284 | 1.81 (0.68-4.82) | 0.094 | 2.39 (0.86-6.66) | |
| Others | 0.4311 | 1.51 (0.54-4.425) | 0.374 | 1.64 (0.55-4.85) | |
| Muslim | Ref | 1 | Ref | 1 | |
| Christian | 0.0347 | 2.25 (1.04-4.86) | 0.037 | 2.45 (1.05-5.67) | |
| Parents | Ref | 1 | Ref | 1 | |
| Other relatives | 0.6257 | 1.34 (0.42-4.42) | 0.632 | 1.36 (0.38-4.84) | |
| Non-relatives | 0.0228 | 4.84 (1.08-21.72) | 0.040 | 5.15 (1.08-24.58) |
Ref: reference group; OR: Crude odds ratio; AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; statistical significance is measured at p-value<0.05 and
: the measurement is statistically significant
Figure 1awareness on the various contraceptive methods among respondents
Figure 2suitable methods of contraceptive method preferred by respondents
Figure 3incidence regarding first time of sex
barriers to contraceptive access among respondents in the four special schools
| Variables | Yesn (%) | Non (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Not knowing where to go | 32 (11.4) | 248 (88.6) |
| Not knowing how to get there | 26 (9.3) | 254 (90.7) |
| Costly/Not able to pay for services | 45 (16.1) | 235 (83.9) |
| Privacy not respected | 8 (2.9) | 272 (97.1) |
| Not treated nicely by providers | 4 (1.4) | 276 (98.6) |
| Not being allowed to go alone afraid/Fearful | 50 (17.9) | 230 (82.1) |
| No same sex provider | 1 (0.4) | 279 (99.6) |
| Embarrassed/Feel shy | 126 (45.0) | 154 (55.0) |
| Inconvenient Hours/Days | 6 (2.1) | 274 (97.9) |
Data is presented in frequencies and percentages
Sources: Field data, 2018