David M Barnes1,2, Don Des Jarlais1,2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 39 Broadway, Suite 530, New York, NY 10006, U.S.A. 2. Permanent address: Department of Epidemiology, College of Global Public Health, New York University, 665 Broadway, 8 floor, New York, NY 10012, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our proof-of-concept study tested a simple cognitive-behavioral strategy based on experimental psychology research that draws on the concept of self-distancing and is consistent with mindfulness principles - using non-first person self-talk when facing substance use cues or cravings -- to help people achieve substance use goals. We evaluated participants' understanding, use, and utility of the intervention at follow-up. METHOD: We recruited 17 New York City residents who used drugs. At baseline, we collected demographic and substance use data and conducted the intervention. At one-week follow-up, participants were asked about their understanding, use, and perceived utility of the intervention, and asked to complete an anonymous five-item assessment of the intervention. RESULTS: Sixteen participants completed follow-up. Understanding was judged "acceptable" or better for 15; 11 used their scripts during follow-up; four described their scripts as very useful, one as moderately, five as a little, and one as not useful. Nine returned assessments; ratings were strongly favorable. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our pilot are encouraging and point to further research on this intervention. The intervention is suitable for integration into longer-term therapy and we envision non-first person self-talk as one strategy alongside others individuals can employ to moderate their substance use.
OBJECTIVE: Our proof-of-concept study tested a simple cognitive-behavioral strategy based on experimental psychology research that draws on the concept of self-distancing and is consistent with mindfulness principles - using non-first person self-talk when facing substance use cues or cravings -- to help people achieve substance use goals. We evaluated participants' understanding, use, and utility of the intervention at follow-up. METHOD: We recruited 17 New York City residents who used drugs. At baseline, we collected demographic and substance use data and conducted the intervention. At one-week follow-up, participants were asked about their understanding, use, and perceived utility of the intervention, and asked to complete an anonymous five-item assessment of the intervention. RESULTS: Sixteen participants completed follow-up. Understanding was judged "acceptable" or better for 15; 11 used their scripts during follow-up; four described their scripts as very useful, one as moderately, five as a little, and one as not useful. Nine returned assessments; ratings were strongly favorable. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our pilot are encouraging and point to further research on this intervention. The intervention is suitable for integration into longer-term therapy and we envision non-first person self-talk as one strategy alongside others individuals can employ to moderate their substance use.
Entities:
Keywords:
cognitive behavioral treatment; mindfulness; substance use