| Literature DB >> 31692772 |
Aarash K Roshandel1,2, Christopher M Busch2,3,4,5, Jennifer Van Mullekom6, Joshua A Cuoco4,5, Cara M Rogers3,4,5, Lisa S Apfel3,4,5, Eric A Marvin3,4,5, Harald W Sontheimer2,3, Robyn A Umans2.
Abstract
Tumor protein 53 (p53) regulates fundamental pathways of cellular growth and differentiation. Aberrant p53 expression in glioblastoma multiforme, a terminal brain cancer, has been associated with worse patient outcomes and decreased chemosensitivity. Therefore, correctly identifying p53 status in glioblastoma is of great clinical significance. p53 immunohistochemistry is used to detect pathological presence of the TP53 gene product. Here, we examined the relationship between p53 immunoreactivity and TP53 mutation status by DNA Sanger sequencing in adult glioblastoma. Of 41 histologically confirmed samples, 27 (66%) were immunopositive for a p53 mutation via immunohistochemistry. Utilizing gene sequencing, we identified only eight samples (20%) with TP53 functional mutations and one sample with a silent mutation. Therefore, a ≥10% p53 immunohistochemistry threshold for predicting TP53 functional mutation status in glioma is insufficient. Implementing this ≥10% threshold, we demonstrated a remarkably low positive-predictive value (30%). Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity with ≥10% p53 immunohistochemistry to predict TP53 functional mutation status were 100% and 42%, respectively. Our data suggests that unless reliable sequencing methodology is available for confirming TP53 status, raising the immunoreactivity threshold would increase positive and negative predictive values as well as the specificity without changing the sensitivity of the immunohistochemistry assay. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: TP53; gene sequencing; glioblastoma multiforme; immunohistochemistry; p53
Year: 2019 PMID: 31692772 PMCID: PMC6817445 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Raw data and demographics of GBM patients
| CGB patient sample # | p53 Immunoreactivity % | Mutation (Amino acid change) | EGFR amplification | R72P polymorphism | Age | Gender | Race |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGB1* | 90 | H179R | — | No | 31 | M | W |
| CGB2 | 5 | + | No | 66 | M | W | |
| CGB4 | 10 | — | Yes | 83 | M | W | |
| CGB5 | 25 | — | Yes | 63 | F | W | |
| CGB8 | 30 | + | No | 73 | M | W | |
| CGB10 | 5 | — | Yes | 66 | F | W | |
| CGB11 | 2 | — | Yes | 64 | M | W | |
| CGB12 | 80 | R273C | + | Yes | 48 | M | W |
| CGB17 | 5 | — | Yes | 54 | F | W | |
| CGB18 | 5 | + | No | 54 | F | B | |
| CGB21 | 60 | — | Yes | 68 | F | W | |
| CGB23 | 1 | — | Yes | 79 | M | W | |
| CGB24 | 10 | — | No | 76 | M | W | |
| CGB26 | 5 | + | No | 62 | F | W | |
| CGB27 | 40 | + | Yes | 59 | M | W | |
| CGB28 | 10 | — | No | 77 | F | W | |
| CGB30 | 20 | — | No | 64 | F | W | |
| CGB33 | 20 | — | Yes | 64 | F | W | |
| CGB36 | 25 | + | Yes | 66 | M | W | |
| CGB37 | 20 | — | No | 75 | F | W | |
| CGB39 | 5 | P108P** | + | No | 81 | F | W |
| CGB44 | 40 | A158H | — | Yes | 73 | F | W |
| CGB47 | 1 | — | No | 54 | M | W | |
| CGB48 | 70 | R273H | — | Yes | 37 | M | W |
| CGB49 | 10 | — | No | 76 | M | B | |
| CGB50 | 25 | + | No | 77 | F | W | |
| CGB51 | 10 | + | Yes | 54 | M | W | |
| CGB54 | 5 | — | No | 64 | F | W | |
| CGB55 | 0 | — | Yes | 84 | M | W | |
| CGB56 | 60 | — | Yes | 62 | M | W | |
| CGB57 | 25 | — | Yes | 65 | M | W | |
| CGB58 | 80 | Y234D | — | Yes | 80 | M | W |
| CGB59 | 5 | — | Yes | 85 | M | W | |
| CGB60 | 5 | — | No | 54 | F | W | |
| CGB61 | 5 | — | No | 71 | F | B | |
| CGB63 | 90 | M246T | — | Yes | 31 | M | H |
| CGB65 | 10 | + | Yes | 58 | F | W | |
| CGB66 | 20 | — | Yes | 40 | F | W | |
| CGB67 | 30 | — | Yes | 74 | M | W | |
| CGB68 | 75 | N235D | — | Yes | 63 | F | W |
| CGB69 | 90 | C176Y | — | Yes | 65 | M | W |
Patients were de-identified and samples were numbered to recognize each CGB tumor sample. For all of the GBM samples used in this study, the p53 mutation statuses and EGFR amplification as deemed by IHC and demographics such as age, gender, and race are listed. Any R72P TP53 polymorphism discovered from Sanger sequencing is also listed. Legend: *secondary glioblastoma, ** silent mutation, Gender: M = Male, F= Female, Race: W= White, B = Black, H= Hispanic.
Figure 1Representative IHC images from freshly resected tumor samples.
p53 immunohistochemistry was performed with the Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc. laboratory utilizing the DO-7 antibody clone. Images were taken at 200x magnification. (A) Glioblastoma sample with wild-type p53 demonstrating 5% immunoreactivity. (B) Glioblastoma sample with mutant p53 demonstrating 80% immunoreactivity. (C) Ovarian serous carcinoma (positive control) demonstrating strong immunoreactivity.
Figure 2Location distribution of TP53 mutations in freshly collected patient samples.
This histogram details the mutations in different TP53 exons discovered from Sanger sequencing analysis. All mutations were found within exons four to eight. However, all mutations in exons five to eight contained functional, missense TP53 mutations unlike the silent mutation found in exon four.
Contingency table summary of TP53 genetic sequencing results versus p53 IHC staining test results for ≥ 10% staining threshold
| TP53 Genetic Sequencing Results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive for functional mutation | Negative for functional mutation | Row totals | |||
| p53 IHC Staining Test | Positive | True Positives | False Positives | Total Staining Positives | Positive Predictive Value |
| (≥10% Staining) | 8 | 19 | 27 | 8/27 | |
| 29.6% | |||||
| Results | Negative | False Negatives | True Negatives | Total Staining Negatives | Negative Predictive Value |
| (<10% Staining) | 0 | 14 | 14 | 14/14 | |
| 100% | |||||
| Column Totals | Total Mutation Positives | Total Mutation Negatives | Overall Total 41 | Accuracy 22/41 53.6% | |
| 8 | 33 | ||||
| Sensitivity | Specificity | ||||
| 8/8 | 14/33 | ||||
| 100% | 42.4% | ||||
Contingency table and associated quantities with TP53 genetic sequencing results as the standard and p53 IHC staining test results with a ≥ 10% staining threshold as the screening test. Sensitivity and specificity are calculated out of column totals representing the percentage of true positives and true negatives in reference to the standard TP53 genetic sequencing results, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values are calculated in reference to the row totals, representing the number of TP53 genetic sequencing results standard values predicted correctly out of the p53 IHC staining test with a ≥ 10% staining threshold positive and negative screening results, respectively. The table indicates a high percentage of false positives and poor predictive capability for p53 IHC with a ≥ 10% staining threshold.
Figure 3Graphical summary of TP53 genetic sequencing results versus p53 IHC staining test results with a ≥10% threshold
As summarized in tabular form, the sensitivity and specificity in using p53 IHC surrogacy as a predictor of TP53 mutational status were 100% and 42%, respectively. The positive-predictive and negative-predictive values were 30% and 100%, respectively. The 100% sensitivity indicates the p53 IHC staining test results with a ≥10% threshold agreed with the n = 8 TP53 functional mutation present samples in all 8 cases resulting in n = 0 or 0% false negatives. The 42% specificity indicates the p53 IHC staining test results with ≥10% threshold agreed with the n = 33 TP53 functional mutation absent samples in only 14 out of 33 cases resulting in n = 19 or 58% false positives.
Contingency table summary of TP53 genetic sequencing results versus p53 IHC staining test results for ≥ 40% staining threshold
| TP53 Genetic Sequencing Results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive for functional mutation | Negative for functional mutation | Row totals | |||
| p53 IHC Staining Test | Positive (≥40% Staining) | True Positives | False Positives | Total Staining Positives | Positive Predictive Value |
| 8 | 3 | 11 | 8/11 | ||
| 72.7% | |||||
| Negative (<40% Staining) | False Negatives | True Negatives | Total Staining Negatives | Negative Predictive Value | |
| 0 | 30 | 30 | 30/30 | ||
| 100% | |||||
| Column Totals | Total Mutation Positives | Total Mutation Negatives | Overall Total 41 | Accuracy 38/41 92.7% | |
| 8 | 33 | ||||
| Sensitivity | Specificity | ||||
| 8/8 | 30/33 | ||||
| 100% | 90.9% | ||||
Contingency table and associated quantities with TP53 genetic sequencing results as the standard and p53 IHC staining test results with a ≥ 40% staining threshold as the screening test. Sensitivity and specificity are calculated out of column totals representing the percentage of true positives and true negatives in reference to the standard TP53 genetic sequencing results, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values are calculated in reference to the row totals, representing the number of TP53 genetic sequencing results standard values predicted correctly out of the p53 IHC staining test with a ≥ 40% staining threshold positive and negative screening results, respectively. This table based on the p53 IHC staining test with a threshold of ≥ 40% indicates a lower percentage of false positives and a higher positive predictive value in comparison to the same test based on a threshold of ≥ 10% in Table 3.
Figure 4Logistic regression fit of TP53 sequencing result versus p53 IHC % staining with inverse prediction interval and mutation label.
An overlay of the actual data (0 = mutation absent, 1 = mutation present), the fitted logistic regression curve, and corresponding lower 95% confidence interval on the inverse prediction for the PS50 is represented in graphical form. (p < 0.0001, Inverse Prediction Lower 95% Confidence Interval on PS50 = 42.4%). Each of the eight samples and its functional TP53 mutation is labeled appropriately within the graph.
Figure 5Graphical summary of TP53 genetic sequencing results versus p53 IHC staining test results with ≥40% threshold.
The 100% sensitivity indicates the p53 IHC staining test results with a ≥40% threshold agreed with the n = 8 TP53 functional mutation present samples in all eight cases resulting in n = 0 or 0% false negatives. The 42% specificity indicates the p53 IHC staining test results with ≥40% threshold agreed with the n = 33 TP53 functional mutation absent samples in 30 out of 33 cases resulting in n = 3 or 9% false positives.
Figure 6Comparison of summary statistics for ≥10% and ≥40% IHC staining thresholds.
(A) There is no change in sensitivity and false negatives from the 10% IHC staining threshold to the 40% IHC staining threshold. (B) There was an improvement in specificity and false positives from the 10% IHC staining threshold to the 40% IHC staining threshold. These data show an improvement in accuracy when changing the IHC threshold.