Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) as a novel prognostic marker for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) management was to stratify patients at pre- and post-surgical level to identify the small proportion of cases with potentially aggressive disease.
PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to evaluate the possible role of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) and BRAF status as prognostic markers in PTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigate programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) immunohistochemical expression in 125 consecutive PTCs with median follow-up of 75.3 months (range, 15-98 months) to verify the possible correlation between BRAF status and correlate the classical clinicopathological prognostic factors and PTC outcome with PDCD4 expression. To further support the data, miR-21 expression was tested (by quantitative real-time PCR and in situ hybridization) in a different series of 30 cases (15 PTCs BRAFwt and 15 PTCs BRAFV600E). Moreover, we validated our results using TGCA thyroid carcinoma dataset.
RESULTS: We found that 59.8% of the patients showed low-grade PDCD4 nuclear expression and low-grade expression correlated with BRAF V600E. Compared with BRAF 15 wild-type tissue samples, a significant miR-21 up-regulation was associated with BRAF V600E mutations. Low-grade PDCD4 resulted, and was associated with aggressive histological variants, higher cancer size, extra-thyroidal extension, multifocality, lymph-node metastasis and lymph nodal ratio at the diagnosis. Concerning the outcome, the low-grade PDCD4 expression correlated at univariate and multivariate analysis, with lower levels of recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) and with poor outcome. Moreover, there was significant association between BRAF V600E patients with PDCD4 nuclear loss and lower RFS, whilet here was significant association between BRAF wild-type patients with PDCD4 nuclear expression and better outcome.
CONCLUSION: These results showed that PDCD4 could predict PTC outcome and that the sum of PDCD4 and BRAF alterations increases the prognostic power of BRAF mutation alone.

Introduction

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the most common thyroid cancer subtype and usually carries a favorable prognosis, with a survival rate of around 90% at 10 years. 80% of low-risk patients are successfully treated with primary surgery followed by radio-iodine (131I) ablation.1,2 Although PTC is generally curable with a good prognosis, 5–15% of patients show local recurrences and/or distant metastases. One in three recurrences lose the ability to trap 131I, and furthers therapies such as as surgery and external radiotherapy become necessary. The prognosis of these patients is unfavorable, due to the lack of effective therapies.

Consequently, the primary goal of PTC management is to stratify patients at pre- and post-surgical level in terms of prognosis. It is aimed at identifying the small proportion of cases with potentially aggressive disease who require tailored treatment and specific follow-up programs.

The classical and well-known clinical-prognostic factors for PTCs are older age at the time of diagnosis, large tumor size, aggressive histological variants, extrathyroidal invasion, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. In the last time, molecular cancer profiling has promise as a novel tool for improving patient risk stratification and prognostics. The largest studies of preoperative molecular markers in patients with indeterminate fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology have, respectively, evaluated a panel of genetic mutations and rearrangements. The new American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer identify at pre-surgical levels a mutational panel including multiple mutations and translocations as BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS point mutations, as well as RET/PTC1, RET/PTC3 and PAX8/PPARc rearrangements.3–6 In indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules, the sensitivity of the seven genes mutational panel testing is variable, with reports ranging from 44% to 100%. This algorithm employing seven-gene mutational testing as a means to inform decision making on extent of primary thyroid surgery (i.e., lobectomy or total thyroidectomy)5 were developed at a time when the ATA guidelines favored total thyroidectomy for most PTCs >1 cm in diameter.7 However, this does not reflect recommendations in these guidelines. The role of BRAF in PTC is debated. At the time, there are no strong evidence of the correlation between BRAF mutations and outcome,8 but the majority of the studies reported an association between BRAF mutation and advanced age at the diagnosis, extrathyroid extension, advanced stages (III–IV), lymph nodes metastasis and recurrences of the disease.9–11

In PTC diagnosis, different immunohistochemical markers were identified such as Galectin-3,12 but none were distinctly correlated to the outcome.

Recently, programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4)–miR21 pathways were evaluated in a series of follicular cells-derived carcinomas (PDCD4) and resulted in down-regulating neoplastic tissues. PDCD4 is a tumor suppressor gene involved in the apoptotic machinery and in cell transformation and invasion, and tumor progression through its interaction with the translation initiation factors eIF4A and eIF4G.13,14 Several mechanisms are involved in PDCD4 dysregulation and the oncogenic microRNA miR-21 has been shown to specifically target the PDCD4 3′-untranslated region, which negatively regulates PDCD4 expression.13–17 In spite of this data, no previous study evaluated PDCD4 expression specifically in PTC and correlated its expression with the outcome.

The aims of the present study were to 1) investigate PDCD4 expression in a larger series of PTCs; 2) verify the possible correlation between BRAF status and nuclear PDCD4 expression; 3) correlate the classical clinicopathological prognostic factors for PTC with PDCD4 expression and BRAF status; and 4) evaluate the possible role of PDCD4 and BRAF status as prognostic markers in PTC.

Materials and methods

Patient’s selection

The study concerned a consecutive series of 125 patients with PTC (51 men [40.8%] and 74 women [59.2%]; median age, 45 years; range, 11–84 years) collected from 2007 to 2011 with a median follow-up of 75.3 months (range, 15–98 months). At our institution, BRAF mutation analysis in fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) is a standard procedure in patients with single thyroid nodules, and/or nodules showing suspect features on ultrasound, so for all the patients included in the study, we had available FNABs on which BRAF status had been explored. Later, all the patients underwent to total or hemi-thyroidectomy and histological diagnoses and staging were done according to the TNM classification.18 The cases considered were retrospectively selected from the electronic archives of the Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology Unit at Padua University. All patients involved in this study gave their informed written consent together with confirmation of parental/legal guardian written informed consent for patients under the age of 18 years in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Committee on Research on Human Tissues of the Padua University approved this study.

DNA extraction and BRAF status detection

DNA from FNAB material was isolated using the QIAamp DNA Micro kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The BRAF status of exon 15 was assessed both by direct sequencing and by mutant allele-specific PCR amplification (MASA) for the T to A substitution at nucleotide 1799 (V600E), based on descriptions in the literature.19 We performed our statistical analysis on the direct sequencing results; in the event of discordant results (sequencing versus MASA), we confirmed the findings by assessing BRAF status in surgical specimens.

Quantitative real-time PCR and miR-21 detection

Tissue samples from 15 BRAF wild-type PTCs and 15 BRAF V600E PTCs were deparaffinized with xylene at 50°C for 3 mins. Total RNA was extracted using the RecoverAll kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The NCode™ miRNA quantitative real-time PCR method (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to detect and quantify mature hsa-miR-21 (miR-21; primer sequence: 5′-CGG TAG CTT ATC AGA CTG ATG TTG A-3′) on real-time PCR instruments according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as previously described.20 Normalization was done with the small nuclear RNA U6B (RNU6B; Invitrogen). PCR reactions were run in triplicate, including no-template controls. The data were analyzed using the comparative CT method.

Histology and PDCD4 immunohistochemistry

Tissue specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Serial histology sections 4–6-μm thick were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and assessed by two pathologists (M.F. and G.P.). Immunohistochemical staining for PDCD4 was done automatically (Ventana Benchmark XT System, Touchstone, AZ, USA) (catalog# HPA001032; Atlas Antibodies, Stockholm, Sweden; 1:100) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.20 Immunohistochemistry (IHC)IHC sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin. Appropriate positive and negative controls were run concurrently. PDCD4 expression in stromal/inflammatory cells and in coexisting non-neoplastic epithelia served as a positive internal control. Only PDCD4 nuclear expression was evaluated by two pathologists (F.G. and G.P.), unaware of any clinical information. PDCD4 nuclear staining was scored on a four-tiered scale (score 0: no stain; score 1: ≥1–≤30% positive nuclei; score 2: >30–≤70%; score 3: ≥71%).21,22 The nuclear immunostaining score was then dichotomized as low-grade versus high-grade (for values of 0 and 1 versus values of 2 and 3).

miR-21 in situ hybridization

Tissue samples from 15 BRAF wild-type PTCs and 15 BRAF V600E PTCs were considered for the in situ hybridization (ISH) study. ISH was performed using the GenPoint® Catalyzed Signal Amplification System (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, slides were incubated at 60°C for 30 mins and deparaffinized, as described elsewhere.23–25 Sections were treated with Proteinase K (DakoCytomation) for 30 mins at room temperature, rinsed several times with dH2O, and immersed in 95% ethanol for 10 s before air-drying. The slides were prehybridized at 49–56°C for 1 hr with mRNA ISH buffer (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA, USA) before incubation overnight at 49–56°C in buffer containing the 5ʹ-biotin-labeled hsa-miR-21 miRCURY® LNA detection probe (Exiqon, Woburn, MA, USA) or the scrambled negative control probe (U6; Exiqon) at a final concentration of 200 nM. The slides were washed in both Tris-buffered saline Tween-20 (TBST) and GenPoint® stringent wash solution (54°C for 30 mins), then exposed to H2O2 blocking solution (DakoCytomation) for 20 mins, and then further blocked in a blocking buffer (DakoCytomation) for 30 mins before they were exposed to primary streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase (HRP) antibody, biotinyl tyramide, secondary streptavidin–HRP antibody, and 3,3ʹ-diaminobenzidine chromogen solutions, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The slides were then briefly counterstained with hematoxylin and rinsed with TBST and water before mounting.

TGCA dataset analysis

TCGA Thyroid carcinoma dataset (validation set/cohort http://cancergenome.nih.gov/cancersselected) was used as an independent set. PDCD4 and miR-21 expression data for 136 tumors from patients with PTC were downloaded and processed. The expression levels have been normalized and logged (base 2). The gene and microRNA of interest have been correlated using Pearson correlation method and the plots were created with R.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the MedCalc Statistical Software version 16.4.3 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium; https://www.medcalc.org; 2016). Categorical data were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Distributions of the continuous variables were assessed and data were summarized accordingly. Group comparisons of categorical variables were performed using the χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test. Mann–Whitney test for nonparametric data was used to correlate lymph node ratio (LNR) with BRAF status and PDCD4 immunohistochemical expression. A multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional-hazards regression with Enter method. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathological features

In this study, we evaluated 125 consecutive patients with cytologic and histological diagnosis of PTCs. The 59.2% (n=74) of all the patients were female and the 40.8% (n=52) were male, accordingly with the prevalence reported in the literature. The mean age was 45 years (range, 11–84 years) and the median age was 44. The histological variants of the 125 PTCs were as follows: classical in 51.2% of cases (64/125), follicular in 22.4% (28/125), oxyphilic in 16.8% (21/125), tall cell in 4.0% (5/125), hobnail in 2.4% (3/125) and columnar in 3.2% (4/125). According to the TNM classification, 80.8% (101/125) patients were in stage I, 18.4% (23/125) were in stage II and 0.8% (1/125) were in stage III. Considering the dimensional criteria, 64.5% (80/125) resulted in T1, 14.5% (18/125) in T2; 17.7% (22/125) in T3 and 3.2% (4/125) in T4. 52.8% of the patients (55/125) was found to have lymph node metastasis at the diagnosis.

Correlation between nuclear PDCD4 expression, BRAF status and miR-21 levels

Among all cases, 52% (65/125) resulted in BRAF V600E mutations, according to literature data26. At the immunohistochemical analysis, 59.8% (74/125) of the patients showed low-grade PDCD4 nuclear expression (Figure 1). Moreover, low-grade PDCD4 nuclear expression correlated with BRAF V600E mutation (P<0.0001) (Figure 2A).

Figure 1

(A–D) PDCD4 immunohistochemistry in PTC samples. The neoplastic cells show low-grade nuclear PDCD4 expression (score 0: no stain and score 1: ≥1–≤30% positive nuclei), while normal tissue (above the line) expresses PDCD4 both in the nucleus and cytoplasm (A). Low-grade nuclear PDCD4 expression in PTC papillae at higher magnification (B). PTC sample with adjacent healthy tissue (above the line) and positive for PDCD4 expression. Both neoplastic cells both healthy cells show a high-grade nuclear PDCD4 staining (score 2: >30≤70%; score 3: ≥71%) (C), also confirmed at higher magnification (D). ×10 (A and C); × 20 (B and D) magnifications.

Abbreviations: PDCD4, programmed cell death 4; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer.

Figure 2

(A–C) High-grade nuclear PDCD4 expression results directly correlated with BRAF V600E mutation (A). Relationship between miR-21 expression levels by quantitative real-time PCR analysis and BRAF status. miR-21 overexpression in PTC directly correlates with BRAF V600E mutation (B). miR-21 was significantly up-regulated on in situ hybridization analysis in PTC samples carried BRAF V600E mutation by comparison with PTC BRAF wild type (wt) (C).

Abbreviations: PDCD4, programmed cell death 4; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer.

Compared with BRAF wild-type tissue samples, a significant miR-21 up-regulation (quantitative real-time PCR) was associated with BRAF V600E mutations (P=0.026) (Figure 2B). miR-21 up-regulation was confirmed in the same neoplastic samples by the miR-21 over-expression revealed by ISH (brown granular cytoplasmic staining; Figure 2C).

Correlation between PDCD4 expression, BRAF status, and clinic-pathological features

At univariate statistical analysis, the loss of nuclear PDCD4 expression resulted associated with aggressive histological variants of PTC as hobnail (66.7%), tall cell (80%) and columnar variants (100%) (P=0.0002) (Figure 3A) and correlated with higher cancer size (P=0.01) (Figure 3B), extra-thyroidal extension (P=0.002), multifocality (P=0.016), lymph node metastasis (P=0.003) (Figure 3C) and lymph nodal ratio (P=0.01) (Figure 3D) at the diagnosis (Table 1).

Figure 3

(A–D) Nuclear PDCD4 expression according to PTC variants (A). Low-grade nuclear PDCD4 expression results directly correlated with higher cancer size (B), lymph node metastasis (C) and LNR (D) at the diagnosis.

Abbreviations: PDCD4, programmed cell death 4; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; CV, classical variant of PTC; TCV, tall-cell variant of PTC; FV, follicular variant of PTC; OV, oxyphilic variant of PTC; HoV, hobnail variant of PTC; CoV, columnar variant of PTC; LNR, lymph nodal ratio.

Table 1

Correlation between PDCD4, clinicopathological features and outcome in patients with PTC

		Total	Low-grade nuclear PDCD4	High-grade nuclear PDCD4	P
Gender	M	52/125 (41.6%)	20/52 (38.5%)	32/73 (43.8%)	0.677
F	73/125 (58.4%)	32/52 (61.5%)	41/73 (56.2%)
Age	<55	94/125 (75.2%)31/125 (24.8%)	38/52 (73.2%)14/52 (26.9%)	56/73 (56.7%)17/73 (23.3%)	0.780
>55
Tumor size (T)	T1–T2	99/125 (79%)	36/52 (68%)	63/73 (87%)	0.006
	T3–T4	26/125 (21%)	17/52 (32%)	9/73 (13%)
Extrathyroidal extension	Yes	83/125 (66.4%)	43/52 (82.7%)	40/73 (54.8%)	0.002
No	42/125 (33.6%)	9/52 (17.3%)	33/74 (45.2%)
Multifocality	Yes	67/125 (54.6%)	35/52 (67.3%)	32/73 (43.8%)	0.016
No	58/125 (46.4%)	17/52 (32.7%)	41/73 (56.2%)
Lymph node metastases	Yes	59/125 (47.2%)	14/52 (26.9%)	45/73 (61.6%)	0.0003
No	66/125 (52.8%)	38/52 (73.1%)	28/73 (38.4%)
Histological variants	CV	64/125 (51.2%)	30/52 (57.7%)	34/73 (46.6%)	0.0002
	TCV	5/125 (4.0%)	4/52 (7.7%)	1/73 (1.4%)
	FV	28/125 (22.4%)	2/52 (3.8%)	26/73 (35.6%)
OVHoVCoV	21/125 (16.8%)3/125 (2.4%)4/125 (3.2%)	10/52 (19.2%)2/52 (3.8%)4/52 (7.7%)	11/73 (15.1%)1/73 (1.4%)0/73 (0.0%)
TNM stage	I–II	124/125 (66.4%)	52/52 (100%)	72/73 (98.6%)	0.398
III–IV	1/125 (33.6%)	0/52 (0%)	1/73 (1.4%)
Outcome	Persisted/recurrent	11/111 (9.9%)	10/51 (19.6%)	4/60 (24%)	0.003
DeathCured	1/111 (89.2%)99/111 (0.9%)	1/51 (2.0%)40/51 (78.4%)	0/60 (0.0%)59/60 (98.3%)

Abbreviations: PDCD4, programmed cell death 4; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; CV, classical variant of PTC; TCV, tall-cell variant of PTC; FV, follicular variant of PTC; OV, oxyphilic variant of PTC; HoV, hobnail variant of PTC; CoV, columnar variant of PTC.

At diagnosis, BRAF mutation was significantly associated with aggressive histological variants (P=0.03) and staging (P=0.04).

Correlation between PDCD4 expression, BRAF status, and outcome

Information about the outcome was available for 111 patients. At the end of follow-up, 11 patients (9.9%) resulted with recurrent/persisted disease, 99 patients (89.9%) resulted cured and only one patient (0.9%) resulted dead for progressive PTC disease. At the statistical analysis, the nuclear loss of PDCD4 expression correlated with lower levels of recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) (P=0.0008) and with poor outcome (evaluated as recurrence/persisted disease status at the end of follow-up) (P=0.003). (Figure 4A and C). BRAF mutation resulted did not correlated with RFS or outcome at the end of follow-up, but interestingly, BRAF V600E patients with PDCD4 nuclear loss resulted significantly associated with lower RFS (0.04) (Figure 4B), while BRAF wild-type patients with PDCD4 nuclear expression resulted significantly associated with better outcome (0.004) (Figure 4D).

Figure 4

(A–C) Nuclear loss of PDCD4 expression correlates with poor outcome. Kaplan–Meier curve for RFS in PTC samples with low-grade and high-grade PDCD4 expression (A). Kaplan–Meier curve for RFS in BRAF V600E samples with low-grade and high-grade PDCD4 expression (B). Low-grade PDCD4 results correlated with recurrent/persisted disease or death at the end of the follow-up (C). BRAF wild type patients with high-grade PDCD4 nuclear expression resulted significantly associated with better outcome (cured disease) (D).

Abbreviations: PDCD4, programmed cell death 4; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; RFS, recurrence-free survival rate.

At multivariate analysis, only the loss of nuclear PDCD4 expression resulted to correlate with RFS (P=0.002) (Figure 5).

Figure 5

At Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, only the loss of nuclear PDCD4 expression resulted to correlate with RFS.

Abbreviations: PDCD4, programmed cell death 4; RFS, recurrence-free survival rate.

Validation analysis

TCGA Thyroid carcinoma dataset analysis confirmed that PDCD4 has a lower nuclear expression in PTC, in particular in classical and tall-cell variant compared to follicular one. Moreover, miR-21 expression inversely correlated with PDCD4 in the considered cohort (P<0.05) (Figure 6A–C).

Figure 6

TGCA dataset validation analysis. PDCD4 expression levels in classical, follicular and tall-cell PTC samples. Each bar represents the mean value of PDCD4 and vertical lines represent 95% CI (P<0.05) (A). On the contrary, miR-21 expression is over-expressed in PTC samples, in particular in tall cell and classical variants (B) and inversely correlated with PDCD4 (C) (P<0.05).

Abbreviations: PDCD4, programmed cell death 4; CV, classical variant of PTC; TCV, tall-cell variant of PTC; FV, follicular variant of PTC; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer.

Discussion

PTC is generally a curable disease with a good prognosis, but the 5–15% of patients show local recurrences and/or distant metastases. One in three recurrences lose the ability to trap 131I, and the prognosis of these patients is unfavorable, due to the lack of effective therapies. In recent years, the primary goal of PTC management was to stratify patients at pre- and post-surgical level to identify the small proportion of cases with potentially aggressive disease who require tailored treatment and specific follow-up programs. In addition to classical risk factors for PTC (age at the time of diagnosis, large tumor size, aggressive histological variants, extrathyroidal invasion, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis), nowadays many studies have identified at pre-surgical levels a seven-genes mutational panel including multiple mutations and translocations as BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS point mutations, as well as RET/PTC1, RET/PTC3 and PAX8/PPARc rearrangements,3–6 able to increase the diagnostic predictive value for PTC. While the molecular profile has improved the diagnostic yield of needle aspiration cytology, on the other hand, there are not yet enough data to fully understand its possible use in the prognosis and follow-up of patients with PTC. The BRAF mutations have already been taken into account as a pre-operative reliable prognostic factor, in order to optimize the choice of surgical treatment. In fact, this mutation is very frequent in PTC, with values ranging from 14% to 64%.27–30 Most of these gene variants cause the substitution of valine with the glutamine at codon 600 of this protein (V600E). This mutation causes constitutively activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. BRAF V600E is found more frequently in the classical variant and the tall-cell variants,9,30,31 while BRAF K601E is more associated with follicular variant.32 The same transgenic mouse models, BRAF V600E mutated, develop PTC with classical architecture or tall cell, with a tendency to dedifferentiation and extrathyroid invasiveness. Numerous studies in the literature have attempted to correlate the classical prognostic parameters listed above with the BRAF mutation, in an attempt to validate its preoperative prognostic value. Among these parameters, the extrathyroid invasion, the advanced stage, and the presence of lymph node metastases seem to be more related to outcome of the patient and associated with the presence of the BRAF mutation.33–35 Lymph node status, however, shows an association weaker than the other two, this is probably due to the approach to the different lymph node dissection offered in the various centers. The correlation between the mutation and the other parameters such as gender, age and size of the primary tumor is not yet clear in the literature to date. These differences appear to be imputable to the different approaches of the various centers in the inclusion of patients in the studies, the interpretation of histological specimens and in various strategies on the treatment and follow-up of these patients.

Also, the role of PDCD4 was investigated in thyroid tumors along with the possibility of its use as a marker of aggressiveness. PDCD4 is a protein that, when expressed at the nuclear level, acts facilitating the process of apoptosis. In many tumors, it was seen to be significantly down-regulated in the nucleus increasing its cytoplasmic positivity, although the significance of this increase at cytosolic level is not yet known. Studies have been conducted on both esophageal carcinomas,33,36 medullary carcinomas of the thyroid gland37 and seminal studies on follicular tumors of the thyroid.20

PDCD4 has been reported to be able to inhibit protein translation through binding to the translation initiation factor eIF4A and inhibiting its RNA helicase activity. Different mechanisms in turn are involved in PDCD4 dysregulation in human cancer; as well as the miR-21 activity, the MAPK pathway and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) cascade also cooperate in PDCD4 proteasome-dependent protein degradation.37–39

This is the first study in which PDCD4 was investigated in a large series of PTC tissues and correlated with clinicopathological features, the main prognostic factors and outcome.

Our results showed that PDCD4 is down-regulated in the 59.8% of the considered series and that the loss of nuclear PDCD4 resulted significantly correlated with BRAF V600E mutation (P<0.0001) and with the classic prognostic factors for PTC as aggressive histological variants (tall cells, hobnail and columnar; P=0.0002), greater cancer size (P=0.01), extra-thyroidal extension (P=0.002), multifocality (P=0.016) and lymph node metastasis at the diagnosis (P=0.003) also expressed as a ratio of the number of positive versus the number of removed lymph nodes (LNR; P=0.03). We evaluated lymph node metastasis also as LNR because in some tumors such as breast cancer, LNR categorization was found as a better predictor for cancer relapse than categorization based on the number of positive lymph nodes.40 To increase the association between the loss of PDCD4 nuclear expression and BRAF V600E, we also analyzed the well known upstream regulator of PDCD4, the microRNA miR-21. Our previous studies20,25,37 demonstrated a significant miR-21 up-regulation accompanied by a marked loss of nuclear PDCD4 protein in some thyroid cancer as familial and sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas, and in a few cases of different thyroid tumors of follicular origins. In this work, we found that in PTC, miR-21 up-regulation is not only associated with a loss of PDCD4, but also to the BRAF V600E mutation. These data allow us to hypothesize that the BRAF mutation might down-regulate the PDCD4 protein through the inhibitory mechanism of miR-21.

The most interesting data regard the association between PDCD4 and outcome. PTC is not usually a lethal carcinoma and, in our series, only one patient died of progressive disease, so to verify the prognostic significance of PDCD4 expression, we used endpoint as not only the survival information but also the recurrence of disease during the follow-up. Thus, we found that at the end of the follow-up, the nuclear loss of PDCD4 expression resulted also correlated with lower values of RFS (P=0.0008) and with a poor outcome (P=0.003). Therefore, PTC patients with nuclear loss of PDCD4 not only show a recurrence/persistence of the disease at the end of the observational period, but the recurrence also occurs earlier. This data allows us to hypothesize that PDCD4 as well as being a negative prognostic factor for PTC could also provide information on performing a closer follow-up of the case with the loss of nuclear expression.

BRAF V600E mutation resulted not correlated with RFS or outcome at the end of follow-up. As previously described,41 there is still debate about whether or not the BRAF V600E mutation could be a poor prognosis predictor of PTC outcome. Some studies found that there was no significant relationship between the BRAF V600E mutation and PTC prognosis.1 But other researches implied that the BRAF V600E mutation predicts poor overall survival and/or RFS of PTC patients [9]. In our previous study, we showed that BRAF-mutated patients needed a second treatment earlier than patients with BRAF wild type, although the difference did not completely reach the statistical significance.8

Interestingly, in the current study, BRAF V600E patients with PDCD4 nuclear loss resulted significantly associated with lower RFS (P=0.04), while BRAF wild-type patients with PDCD4 nuclear expression resulted significantly associated with better outcome (P=0.004). This data support the hypothesis that the presence of both alterations represents a negative prognostic factor for the outcome of the disease. In clinical practice, we could suppose a combined use of the two markers, maybe even at pre-surgical level. This type of dual analysis could also add to the high diagnostic value of BRAF mutated-status for PTC, even to the negative prognostic value of PDCD4.

In conclusion, our study showed that in PTC, the loss of nuclear PDCD4 is associated with more adverse clinicopathological features such as aggressive histological variants, BRAF mutation and lymph node metastases. In addition, the loss of PDCD4 is associated with a low value of RFS and a poor outcome. Thus, the sum of PDCD4 and BRAF alterations increases the prognostic power of BRAF mutation alone.