| Literature DB >> 31691845 |
Casper Beijst1,2,3, Jeroen Dudink4,5, Rens Wientjes6, Isabel Benavente-Fernandez7, Floris Groenendaal4,5, Margaretha J Brouwer4, Ivana Išgum8, Hugo W A M de Jong9, Linda S de Vries4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation can be measured accurately by MRI. However, two-dimensional (2-D) cranial US can be used at the bedside on a daily basis.Entities:
Keywords: Brain; Germinal matrix intraventricular haemorrhage; Infants; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasound; Ventricular volume
Year: 2019 PMID: 31691845 PMCID: PMC6978291 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04542-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Radiol ISSN: 0301-0449
Fig. 1Imaging measurements in a boy who was born at 28 weeks of gestational age and developed post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. He was examined at a postnatal age of 12 weeks. a, b Coronal (a) and sagittal (b) US images show how the ventricular index (VI), anterior horn width (AHW) and thalamo-occipital distance (TOD) were determined for this study
Fig. 2MRI segmentation in a boy born at 28 weeks of gestation who developed post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation and was examined at a postnatal age of 12 weeks. The montage of images shows the MRI segmentation of the ventricles in several transaxial slices
Patient characteristics
| Mean | Standard Deviation | Minimum | Maximum | Count | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (weeks) | 27.2 | 1.5 | 24.9 | 30.4 | ||
| Birth weight (g) | 1,039 | 288 | 670 | 1,775 | ||
| Post-menstrual age MRI (weeks) | 41.3 | 0.8 | 40.3 | 43.1 | ||
| Weight at term-equivalent age (g) | 3,496 | 480 | 2,285 | 4,735 | ||
| Grade intra-ventricular haemorrhage | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 2 | 25 | |||||
| 3 | 6 | |||||
| Ventriculo-peritoneal drain | Yes | 2 | ||||
| No | 29 | |||||
| Gender | Female | 11 | ||||
| Male | 20 |
MRI and two-dimensional cranial US measurements at term-equivalent age (n=31)
| Mean | Median | Minimum | Maximum | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ventricular volume, MRI (ml) | 8.1 | 6.1 | 2.0 | 30.3 | 5.9 |
| Ventricular index, cranial US (mm) | 13.6 | 13.7 | 8.4 | 19.5 | 2.0 |
| Anterior horn width, cranial US (mm) | 4.4 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 12.1 | 2.6 |
| Thalamo-occipital distance, cranial US (mm) | 20.7 | 20.4 | 7.4 | 46.0 | 8.0 |
SD standard deviation
Fig. 3Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived ventricular volume. a–c Plotted as a function of ventricular index (a), anterior horn width (b) and thalamo-occipital distance (c). We performed a linear fit and the resulting functions were: ventricular volume (ml) = −16.1+1.77 × ventricular index (mm) (R2 = 0.334); ventricular volume (ml) = −0.01+1.84 × anterior horn width (mm) (R2 = 0.658); and ventricular volume (ml) = −3.70+0.576 × thalamo-occipital distance (mm) (R2 = 0.574)
Parameter values of the univariate general linear model with the parameters anterior horn width and thalamo-occipital distance and the cube root of the ventricular volume as the independent variables
| Parameter | Parameter value | 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||
| 1.096 | <0.001 | .969 | 1.224 | |
| 0.094 | <0.001 | .072 | .116 | |
| 0.020 | <0.001 | .013 | .028 | |
R2 = 0.831 (Adjusted R2 = 0.825)
∛ventricular volume (ml) = a + b × anterior horn width (mm) + c × thalamo-occipital distance (mm)
Fig. 4The residual ventricular volume plotted as a function of the ventricular volume in the cube root domain for the model described in this study
Fig. 5Comparison of the model described in this study and the model obtained by Benavente-Fernandez et al. [13]. a With the predicted ventricular volume plotted as a function of the measured ventricular volume. b With the residual ventricular volume plotted as a function of the ventricular volume