| Literature DB >> 31691837 |
Alexandra Stauffer1, Yvonne Schwarz2, Marion Uranyi2, Florian Schachinger1, Werner Girsch3, Rudolf Ganger1, Sebastian Farr4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Instabilities of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, caused by idiopathic ligamentous hyperlaxity, trauma or other conditions may lead to pain, functional impairment and eventually osteoarthritis. Several techniques have been described to enhance stability of the CMC 1. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcomes after CMC 1 joint stabilization using a soft-tissue procedure in patients with chronic instability.Entities:
Keywords: Abductor pollicis longus; CMC joint; Carpometacarpal joint; Chronic instability; Habitual dislocation; Stabilization
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31691837 PMCID: PMC6989670 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03302-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ISSN: 0936-8051 Impact factor: 3.067
Fig. 1Schematic drawing of the APL tendon strip routing used for soft-tissue stabilization of the CMC 1
Fig. 2Intraoperative situs is shown. a A straight incision is drawn centered over the CMC 1, b the APL tendon is followed to its insertion, c transverse tunnels are made with a small clamp, d the tendon strip is pulled through the tunnels (figure-of-eight), e the knots are secured, and f stability is confirmed bimanually
Demographic details of the study group
| Variable | Case group |
|---|---|
| Total procedures, | 15 |
| Patient characteristics | |
| Sex, male, | 1 |
| Sex, female, | 11 |
| Affected thumb, right, | 9 |
| Affected thumb, left, | 6 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.3 (17.3–44.1) |
| Follow-up characteristics | |
| Age at surgery, years | 23.2 (7.4–41.3) |
| Age at re-evaluation, years | 26.7 (11.0–43.5) |
| Follow-up period, years | 3.5 (1.3–5.8) |
Data are expressed as mean (range) unless indicated otherwise
Fig. 3Mean values of DASH (20.1 ± 10.9 with aplasia vs. 8.8 ± 9.6 without aplasia; p = 0.054) and Nelson scores (78.0 ± 8.8 with aplasia vs. 94.2 ± 7.4 without aplasia; p = 0.002) are shown
Outcomes of postoperative clinical and radiographic stress testing of stability
| Case | Side | Operated vs. non-operated | Clinical shift | Radiographic shift | Trapezium hypoplasia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R | Non-OP | 3 | 2 | None |
| L | OP | 2 | 2 | None | |
| 2 | R | OP | 0 | 1 | None |
| L | OP | 0 | 1 | None | |
| 3 | R | Non-OP | 1 | 0 | None |
| L | OP | 1 | 0 | None | |
| 4 | R | OP | 2 | 3 | Yes |
| L | Non-OP | 2 | 3 | Yes | |
| 5 | R | OP | 0 | 0 | Yes |
| L* | OP | 0 | 0 | Yes | |
| 6 | R | OP | 2 | 2 | Yes |
| L | OP | 3 | 2 | Yes | |
| 7 | R | OP | 0 | 0 | None |
| L | Non-OP | 0 | 0 | None | |
| 8 | R | OP | 0 | 1 | None |
| L | Non-OP | 0 | 1 | None | |
| 9 | R | OP | 1 | 0 | None |
| L | OP | 0 | 0 | None | |
| 10 | R | OP | 0 | 1 | Yes |
| L | Non-OP | 0 | 1 | Yes | |
| 11 | R | Non-OP | 1 | 1 | None |
| L | OP | 0 | 1 | None | |
| 12 | R | OP | 0 | 3 | Yes |
| L | Non-OP | 2 | 3 | Yes |
R right, L left, OP operated, non-OP non-operated
*Not included in analysis due to follow-up < 1 year
Fig. 4An adolescent patient with trapezium hypoplasia (a, b) and severe shifting (c) is shown. Nevertheless, she had no clinical symptoms at all on the operated right side
Fig. 5Stress tests are presented. a In patients with trapezium hypoplasia, b In patients without trapezium hypoplasia. Note the difference between groups with regard to grade 3 (severe) dislocations