| Literature DB >> 31691305 |
Sigrid Salomonsson1, Fredrik Santoft2, Elin Lindsäter2, Kersti Ejeby3, Martin Ingvar4, Brjánn Ljótsson1,2, Lars-Göran Öst2,5, Mats Lekander4,6, Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf2,4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate specific effects for patients with adjustment or exhaustion disorder, the Stress subgroup (n = 152), regarding symptom severity and sick leave after CBT, a return-to-work intervention (RTW-I), and a combination of them (COMBO), using data from a randomized trial. In the original study, primary care patients on sick leave (N = 211) were randomized to CBT (n = 64), RTW-I (n = 67), or COMBO (n = 80). Blinded Clinician Severity Rating (CSR) of symptoms and sick leave registry data were primary outcomes. Subgroup analyses showed that for the Stress subgroup, CBT led to greater reduction of symptoms than RTW-I posttreatment, but COMBO did not differ from CBT or RTW-I. Regarding sick leave, there was no difference between treatments in the Stress subgroup. An exploratory analysis of the treatment effects in a subgroup of patients with depression, anxiety or insomnia indicates that RTW-I reduced sick leave faster than CBT. We conclude that CBT may be promising as an effective treatment of stress and exhaustion disorder.Entities:
Keywords: CBT; Stress; adjustment disorder; depression; exhaustion disorder; return-to-work
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31691305 DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scand J Psychol ISSN: 0036-5564