Beatriz Lara1, Jorge Gutiérrez-Hellín1,2, Alberto García-Bataller3, Paloma Rodríguez-Fernández4, Blanca Romero-Moraleda1, Juan Del Coso5. 1. Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain. 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo, Spain. 3. Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 4. Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, Spain. 5. Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, Spain. juan.delcoso@urjc.es.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Recent investigations have established that the ingestion of a moderate dose of caffeine (3-6 mg kg-1) can increase exercise and sports performance in women. However, it is unknown whether the ergogenicity of caffeine is similar during all phases of the menstrual cycle. The aim of this investigation was to determine the ergogenic effects of caffeine in three phases of the menstrual cycle. METHODS:Thirteen well-trained eumenorrheic triathletes (age = 31 ± 6 years; body mass = 58.6 ± 7.8 kg) participated in a double-blind, cross-over, randomised experimental trial. In the (1) early follicular (EF); (2) preovulation (PO); (3) and mid luteal (ML) phases, participants either ingested a placebo (cellulose) or 3 mg kg-1 of caffeine in an opaque and unidentifiable capsule. After a 60-min wait for substance absorption, participants performed an incremental maximal cycle ergometer test until volitional fatigue (25 W/min) to assess peak aerobic cycling power (Wmax). RESULTS: In comparison to the placebo, caffeine increased Wmax in the EF (4.13 ± 0.69 vs. 4.24 ± 0.71 W kg-1, Δ = 2.7 ± 3.3%, P = 0.01), in the PO (4.14 ± 0.70 vs. 4.27 ± 0.73 W kg-1, Δ = 3.3 ± 5.0%; P = 0.03) and in the ML (4.15 ± 0.69 vs. 4.29 ± 0.67 W kg-1, Δ = 3.6 ± 5.1%; P = 0.01) phases. The magnitude of the caffeine ergogenic effect was similar during all of the menstrual cycle phases (P = 0.85). CONCLUSION:Caffeine increased peak aerobic cycling power in the early follicular, preovulatory, and mid luteal phases. Thus, the ingestion of 3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass might be considered an ergogenic aid for eumenorrheic women during all three phases of the menstrual cycle.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Recent investigations have established that the ingestion of a moderate dose of caffeine (3-6 mg kg-1) can increase exercise and sports performance in women. However, it is unknown whether the ergogenicity of caffeine is similar during all phases of the menstrual cycle. The aim of this investigation was to determine the ergogenic effects of caffeine in three phases of the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Thirteen well-trained eumenorrheic triathletes (age = 31 ± 6 years; body mass = 58.6 ± 7.8 kg) participated in a double-blind, cross-over, randomised experimental trial. In the (1) early follicular (EF); (2) preovulation (PO); (3) and mid luteal (ML) phases, participants either ingested a placebo (cellulose) or 3 mg kg-1 of caffeine in an opaque and unidentifiable capsule. After a 60-min wait for substance absorption, participants performed an incremental maximal cycle ergometer test until volitional fatigue (25 W/min) to assess peak aerobic cycling power (Wmax). RESULTS: In comparison to the placebo, caffeine increased Wmax in the EF (4.13 ± 0.69 vs. 4.24 ± 0.71 W kg-1, Δ = 2.7 ± 3.3%, P = 0.01), in the PO (4.14 ± 0.70 vs. 4.27 ± 0.73 W kg-1, Δ = 3.3 ± 5.0%; P = 0.03) and in the ML (4.15 ± 0.69 vs. 4.29 ± 0.67 W kg-1, Δ = 3.6 ± 5.1%; P = 0.01) phases. The magnitude of the caffeine ergogenic effect was similar during all of the menstrual cycle phases (P = 0.85). CONCLUSION:Caffeine increased peak aerobic cycling power in the early follicular, preovulatory, and mid luteal phases. Thus, the ingestion of 3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass might be considered an ergogenic aid for eumenorrheic women during all three phases of the menstrual cycle.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ergogenicity; Exercise; Physical activity; Sex; Stimulant; Women
Authors: Gordon L Warren; Nicole D Park; Robert D Maresca; Kimberly I McKibans; Melinda L Millard-Stafford Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Erica Goldstein; Patrick L Jacobs; Michael Whitehurst; Tina Penhollow; Jose Antonio Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Juan José Salinero; Beatriz Lara; Ester Jiménez-Ormeño; Blanca Romero-Moraleda; Verónica Giráldez-Costas; Gabriel Baltazar-Martins; Juan Del Coso Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Ronald J Maughan; Louise M Burke; Jiri Dvorak; D Enette Larson-Meyer; Peter Peeling; Stuart M Phillips; Eric S Rawson; Neil P Walsh; Ina Garthe; Hans Geyer; Romain Meeusen; Lucas J C van Loon; Susan M Shirreffs; Lawrence L Spriet; Mark Stuart; Alan Vernec; Kevin Currell; Vidya M Ali; Richard Gm Budgett; Arne Ljungqvist; Margo Mountjoy; Yannis P Pitsiladis; Torbjørn Soligard; Uğur Erdener; Lars Engebretsen Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Verónica Giráldez-Costas; Millán Aguilar-Navarro; Jaime González-García; Juan Del Coso; Juan José Salinero Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 4.948
Authors: Kelly Lee McNulty; Kirsty Jayne Elliott-Sale; Eimear Dolan; Paul Alan Swinton; Paul Ansdell; Stuart Goodall; Kevin Thomas; Kirsty Marie Hicks Journal: Sports Med Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Mikaeli Anne Carmichael; Rebecca Louise Thomson; Lisa Jane Moran; Thomas Philip Wycherley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Pablo Abián; Fernando Martínez; Fernando Jiménez; Javier Abián-Vicén Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390