Literature DB >> 31690644

Influence of age, laterality, patient position, and spinal level on the interlamina space for spinal puncture.

Jinyoung Bae1, Sun-Kyung Park1, Seokha Yoo1, Young-Jin Lim1,2, Jin-Tae Kim3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The lumbar interlamina space height is an important determinant of successful spinal puncture. We aimed to evaluate the influence of age, laterality, patient position, and spinal level on the height of the interlamina window using ultrasonography.
METHODS: Ultrasonographic examination was performed in 20 adult patients aged under 40 years (group Y) and 20 patients aged over 60 years (group O). We set three primary outcomes: difference in the interlamina height of the ligamentum flavum-dura mater complex (LFD) according to (1) age, (2) laterality, and (3) position. For secondary outcomes, the degree of ultrasonography visualization (poor, intermediate, or good) and the depths from the skin to LFD and to anterior complex were also measured on right and left paramedian sagittal oblique view in both lateral and sitting positions at L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels. All variables were analyzed in association with age, laterality, patient position, and spinal level.
RESULTS: The interlamina height of LFD was higher, and the degree of visualization was better in group Y than in group O. It differed depending on laterality in paramedian sagittal oblique view images in the same patients at all spinal levels. The interlamina height of LFD was the largest at L5/S1 level in both groups. Position had little influence on the interlamina height of LFD.
CONCLUSIONS: Scanning both sides and all spinal levels before selecting a puncture site for ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia is recommended. The L5/S1 spinal level is a good option for spinal puncture in the elderly. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03929874. © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; neuraxial blocks: combined spinal/epidural; neuraxial blocks: spinal

Year:  2019        PMID: 31690644     DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  3 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasonography for lumbar neuraxial block.

Authors:  Seokha Yoo; Youngwon Kim; Sun-Kyung Park; Sang-Hwan Ji; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2020-10-30

2.  Optimal angle of needle insertion for spinal anesthesia in patients with spondylolisthesis: an ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  Youngwon Kim; Seokha Yoo; Sun-Kyung Park; Hansu Bae; Young-Jin Lim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Ultrasound-assisted modified paramedian technique for spinal anesthesia in elderly.

Authors:  Wei Zeng; Yisa Shi; Qihui Zheng; Shengfang Du
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.376

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.