| Literature DB >> 31689928 |
Lijun Bao1,2, Wenyang Cai3,4, Xiaofen Zhang5, Jinhong Liu6, Hao Chen7,8, Yuansong Wei9,10, Xiuxiu Jia11, Zhihui Bai12,13.
Abstract
The surfaces of a leaf are unique and wide habitats for a microbial community. These microorganisms play a key role in plant growth and adaptation to adverse conditions, such as producing growth factors to promote plant growth and inhibiting pathogens to protect host plants. The composition of microbial communities very greatly amongst different plant species, yet there is little data on the composition of the microbiome of the host plants on the coral island in the South China Sea. In this study, we investigated the abundances and members of a major microbial community (fungi, bacteria, and diazotrophs) on the leaves of five dominant plant species (<span class="Species">Ipomoea pes-caprae, <span class="Species">Wedelia chinensis, Scaevola sericea, Cocos nucifera, and Sesuvium portulacastrum) on the island using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Quantitative PCR results showed that fungi and bacteria were ubiquitous and variable among different host plants. Scaevola sericea showed the lowest absolute abundance and highest diversity of fungi and bacteria, while Cocos nucifera had the lowest abundance and the highest diversity of diazotrophs compare to the other four plants. There was a small proportion of shared microorganisms among the five different plants, while unique fungi, bacteria and diazotrophs were significantly enriched for different host plant species in this study (p < 0.05). Some of the most abundant organisms found in the communities of these different host plants are involved in important biogeochemical cycles that can benefit their host, including carbon and nitrogen cycles.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; diazotrophs; fungi; phyllosphere; tropical plants
Year: 2019 PMID: 31689928 PMCID: PMC6920945 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7110525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, 16S rRNA gene and nifH gene copy number as quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the phyllosphere samples. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e) above the columns indicate significant differences among phyllosphere samples at p < 0.05. IP indicates Ipomoea pes-caprae, WC indicates Wedelia chinensis, SS indicates Scaevola sericea, CN indicates Cocos nucifera, SP indicates Sesuvium portulacastrum.
Alpha-diversity of microbes between different phyllosphere samples.
| Taxa | Samples | Shannon | Chao1 | Heip | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fungi | IP | 2.39 ± 0.07c | 279 ± 16b | 0.050 ± 0.001b | 0.9988 ± 0.0001a |
| WC | 1.35 ± 0.14b | 290 ± 21b | 0.013 ± 0.003a | 0.9989 ± 0.0000a | |
| SS | 3.22 ± 0.15d | 483 ± 3c | 0.057 ± 0.005c | 0.9985 ± 0.0003a | |
| CN | 1.33 ± 0.02b | 278 ± 41b | 0.014 ± 0.001a | 0.9988 ± 0.0002a | |
| SP | 0.77 ± 0.15a | 146 ± 44a | 0.013 ± 0.001a | 0.9994 ± 0.0003b | |
| Bacteria | IP | 2.13 ± 0.05a | 498 ± 37a | 0.023 ± 0.001a | 0.9968 ± 0.0008b |
| WC | 4.40 ± 0.02d | 1288 ± 80c | 0.090 ± 0.010c | 0.9911 ± 0.0025ab | |
| SS | 5.52 ± 0.04e | 2070 ± 55e | 0.149 ± 0.011d | 0.9862 ± 0.0030a | |
| CN | 3.87 ± 0.08c | 1549 ± 223d | 0.046 ± 0.005b | 0.9865 ± 0.0036a | |
| SP | 2.78 ± 0.07b | 1034 ± 122b | 0.024 ± 0.003a | 0.9927 ± 0.0016b | |
| Diazotrophs | IP | 1.87 ± 0.20a | 137 ± 16a | 0.045 ± 0.005a | 0.9989 ± 0.0003a |
| WC | 4.30 ± 0.02c | 219 ± 8b | 0.346 ± 0.013d | 0.9992 ± 0.0004a | |
| SS | 3.51 ± 0.25b | 192 ± 30b | 0.183 ± 0.053b | 0.9992 ± 0.0002a | |
| CN | 4.73 ± 0.07d | 467 ± 46d | 0.253 ± 0.044c | 0.9980 ± 0.0006a | |
| SP | 4.33 ± 0.21c | 279 ± 29c | 0.285 ± 0.040cd | 0.9985 ± 0.0008a |
Different letters between five phyllosphere indicate significant differences among samples at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Hierarchical cluster analysis and principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of fungi, bacteria and nitrogen-fixing bacteria community composition in sampled phyllosphere. IP indicates Ipomoea pes-caprae, WC indicates Wedelia chinensis, SS indicates Scaevola sericea, CN indicates Cocos nucifera, SP indicates Sesuvium portulacastrum.
Figure 3Venn diagrams showing the distribution of fungal (a), bacterial (b) and diazotrophic (c) operational taxonomic units (OTUs) between phyllosphere samples. IP indicates Ipomoea pes-caprae, WC indicates Wedelia chinensis, SS indicates Scaevola sericea, CN indicates Cocos nucifera, SP indicates Sesuvium portulacastrum.
Figure 4The relative abundances of fungi at class level of five different phyllosphere samples (a). Taxonomic differences among different phyllosphere samples by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with effect size (LEfSe). Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences among different phyllosphere samples (b). LDA scores were calculated by the LDA effect size, using the linear discriminant analysis to assess the effect size for each differential genera with relative abundance of the taxa comprising more than 0.1% of the fungal sequences in each sample (c). IP indicates Ipomoea pes-caprae, WC indicates Wedelia chinensis, SS indicates Scaevola sericea, CN indicates Cocos nucifera, SP indicates Sesuvium portulacastrum.
Figure 5The relative abundances of bacteria at phylum/class level between different phyllosphere samples (a). Taxonomic differences among different phyllosphere samples by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with effect size (LEfSe). Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences among different phyllosphere samples (b). LDA scores were calculated by the LDA effect size, using the linear discriminant analysis to assess the effect size for each differential genera with relative abundance of the taxa comprising more than 0.5% of the bacterial sequences in each sample (c). IP indicates Ipomoea pes-caprae, WC indicates Wedelia chinensis, SS indicates Scaevola sericea, CN indicates Cocos nucifera, SP indicates Sesuvium portulacastrum.
Figure 6The relative abundances of diazotrophs at phylum level of five different phyllosphere samples (a). Heatmap of shared diazotrophic genera between the five phyllosphere samples (b). Taxonomic differences among different phyllosphere samples by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with effect size (LEfSe). Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences among different phyllosphere samples (c). LDA scores were calculated by the LDA effect size, using the linear discriminant analysis to assess the effect size for each differential genera with relative abundance of the taxa comprising more than 0.1% of the diazotrophic sequences in each sample (d). IP indicates Ipomoea pes-caprae, WC indicates Wedelia chinensis, SS indicates Scaevola sericea, CN indicates Cocos nucifera, SP indicates Sesuvium portulacastrum.