Literature DB >> 31689730

An Objective Assessment of Orthognathic Surgery Patients.

Ladan Eslamian1, Ali Borzabadi-Farahani2, Mohammad Reza Badiee1, Bach T Le3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess malocclusions, skeletal relationships and the functional needs of orthognathic patients treated in a University teaching hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study used clinical records of 100 consecutive patients [51 female, 49 males, mean (SD) age =21.5 (2.71) years] who had orthognathic surgery in a Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospital (9/2014-7/2017). Malocclusion type (incisor classification), sagittal skeletal pattern (ANB angle), index of orthognathic functional treatment need (IOFTN) score, and osteotomy type were recorded.
RESULTS: Overall, 66%, 31%, and 3% had Class III, II, and Class I malocclusions, respectively. Similarly, 68% and 32% had Class III and II sagittal skeletal relationships, respectively. Overall, 95% of patients scored IOFTN 4 or 5. The most prevalent IOFTN score were 4.3 (37%), 5.3 (16%), 5.4 (16%), and 4.2 (10%). There were no gender differences (P >0.05) for the distribution of malocclusions, sagittal skeletal relationships, different IOFTN scores, or when IOFTN scores were re-grouped (5, 4, and ≤3). When IOFTN scores were re-grouped (5, 4, and ≤3), they were equally distributed among patients with Class II or III skeletal relationships (P >0.05), but when the authors looked at different malocclusions, there were significant differences in IOFTN score distribution (P = 0.006). The use of genioplasty (4%) or distraction osteogenesis (2%) was limited. Single jaw surgery of either maxilla or mandible was used in 15% and 22% of patients, respectively. About 63% had undergone double-jaw surgery.
CONCLUSION: Retrospective assessment using IOFTN identified 95% of patients as having great and very great functional needs, but prospective studies using IOFTN is needed to assess the need for orthognathic surgery. Class III malocclusions and Class III sagittal skeletal relationships were more common in this sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31689730     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamad Nagi Bou Wadi; Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; Daniel Salvatore Freitas; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado; Renata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira; Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de Oliveira; Guilherme Janson; Fabricio Pinelli Valarelli
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-09-07

2.  Correlation Analysis between Three-Dimensional Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Space and Skeletal Changes in Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion following Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Moonhwan Kim; Chung-Ju Hwang; Jung-Yul Cha; Sang-Hwy Lee; Young Joon Kim; Hyung-Seog Yu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A volumetric study of mandibular condyles in orthognathic patients by semiautomatic segmentation.

Authors:  Max-Philipp Lentzen; Maximilian Riekert; Johannes Buller; Andrea Grandoch; Matthias Zirk; Joachim E Zoeller; Matthias Kreppel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.