Intercity variability and local factors influencing the level of pesticide residues in marketed fruits and vegetables of China.

Controlling pesticide residues in marketed fruits and vegetables is an essential issue for food safety and public health. Local governments improve local conditions, like policymaking and implementation, economic structure and development level, and agricultural practices, to control pesticide residues. However, the level of influence and relative importance of these local factors are not analyzed quantitatively. Here we present the food safety level across 42 Chinese cities as measured by the level of pesticide residues (LPR) in fresh fruits and vegetables, and explore how local socio-economic and policy factors influence its intercity variability. A total of 12,070 sample measurements were used in this study. The relationships between LPR and local socio-economic-policy factors were tested by using Pearson correlation analysis, two-sided independent t-test, and stepwise multivariable linear regression. Our analysis shows that: (1) the pesticide residues in 97.1% of the samples were within legal limits, but the LPR had a considerable cross-city disparity and (2) eight socio-economic-policy variables were found to be significantly correlated with LPR at the city level. Six policy-related variables, namely the number of pesticide-related policies, the number of food safety-related policies, the number of food safety-related news reports, the supermarket revolution, the administrative level of the city and the transparency of supervision of food safety, could explain 32.8% of the intercity variability of LPR. This was followed by the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita from the tertiary sector (15.6%) and the pesticide usage per cultivated area in local agriculture (13.4%). After eliminating the collinearity of these variables, local socio-economic-policy factors collectively could explain around 40% of the intercity variability of LPR. This indicates that local-level policy may have a larger impact on local food safety in terms of LPR than economic factors or local agricultural practice, underscoring the critical role of local government in ensuring food safety.