Literature DB >> 31689483

Ethanol-paired stimuli can increase reinforced ethanol responding.

R J Lamb1, Charles W Schindler2, Brett C Ginsburg3.   

Abstract

While ethanol-paired stimuli are frequently postulated to increase drinking motivation and thus increase ethanol responding and precipitate relapse, no study has demonstrated increases in ethanol-reinforced responding following presentation of an ethanol-paired stimulus that had not previously been part of a contingent relationship. Previous studies have shown that food-paired stimuli can increase food responding that is at low rates and increase food consumption in food-sated rats. In Experiment 1, we show that an ethanol-paired stimulus can increase ethanol responding that is at low levels late in the experimental session, presumably due to satiation. However, these increases may have resulted from either associative or non-associative mechanisms. In Experiment 2, we compared the effects of an ethanol-paired stimulus to those of the same stimulus in a Truly-Random-Control group. In a Truly-Random-Control, the stimulus and ethanol each are presented on independent random schedules, and thus any differences between the effects of the stimulus in the experimental and control groups is likely attributable to the association between the stimulus and ethanol. The stimulus increased ethanol-reinforced responding in both the experimental and control groups, but these increases were greater in the experimental than the control group. Thus, both stimulus-change and the pairing of the stimulus with ethanol may result in increases in ethanol-reinforced responding.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; Alcoholism; Craving; Ethanol self-administration; Lewis rat; Long-Evans Hooded rat; Operant behavior; Pavlovian conditioning; Relapse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31689483      PMCID: PMC7195246          DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2019.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol        ISSN: 0741-8329            Impact factor:   2.405


  34 in total

1.  Role of conditioned reinforcers in the initiation, maintenance and extinction of drug-seeking behavior.

Authors:  W M Davis; S G Smith
Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci       Date:  1976 Oct-Dec

2.  Pavlovian conditioning with ethanol: sign-tracking (autoshaping), conditioned incentive, and ethanol self-administration.

Authors:  Marvin D Krank
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Sign-tracking (autoshaping) in rats: a comparison of cocaine and food as unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Stanley J Weiss
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The attribution of incentive salience to a stimulus that signals an intravenous injection of cocaine.

Authors:  Jason M Uslaner; Martin J Acerbo; Samantha A Jones; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Recent progress in research on the neurophysiologic basis of morphine addiction.

Authors:  A WIKLER
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1948-11       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Ethanol-associated cues produce general pavlovian-instrumental transfer.

Authors:  Laura H Corbit; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  The role of Pavlovian cues in alcohol seeking in dependent and nondependent rats.

Authors:  Suzette V Glasner; J Bruce Overmier; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-01

8.  Shifts in discriminative control with increasing periods of recovery in the rat.

Authors:  Brett C Ginsburg; Richard J Lamb
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Effects of an ethanol-paired CS on responding for ethanol and food: Comparisons with a stimulus in a Truly-Random-Control group and to a food-paired CS on responding for food.

Authors:  R J Lamb; Brett C Ginsburg; Charles W Schindler
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 10.  Opponent process theory of motivation: neurobiological evidence from studies of opiate dependence.

Authors:  G F Koob; L Stinus; M Le Moal; F E Bloom
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1989 Summer-Fall       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  1 in total

1.  Conditioned stimulus effects on paired or alternative reinforcement depend on presentation duration: Implications for conceptualizations of craving.

Authors:  Brett C Ginsburg; Acacia Nawrocik-Madrid; Charles W Schindler; R J Lamb
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.617

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.