| Literature DB >> 31689237 |
Junyi Shen1, Yongjie Zhou2, Xiaoyun Zhang1, Wei Peng1, Chihan Peng1, Qiang Zhou1, Chuan Li1, Tianfu Wen1, Yujun Shi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is characterized by a highly aggressive nature and a dismal outcome. FOXA2 is an archetypal transcription factor involved in cholangiocyte proliferation.Entities:
Keywords: FOXA2; MAPK signaling pathway; TAA; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31689237 PMCID: PMC6874455 DOI: 10.18632/aging.102332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1The correlation between intratumor FOXA2 expression and outcomes. (A) Representative immunostaining images of FOXA2 in ICC; (B) Protein level of FOXA2 in adjacent noncancerous tissue and tumor tissue. GAPDH was used as the loading control; (C) Paired analysis showed that FOXA2 expression was decreased in tumor samples. T: tumor tissue; N: adjacent normal tissue; (D) The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of 85 ICC patients were compared between the low- and high-FOXA2 expression groups (P < 0.001, log-rank test).
Clinical characteristics of patients grouped by FoxA2 expression.
| Age | 55±13.1 | 57±10 | 0.59 |
| Gender(M/F) | 25/25 | 17/18 | 0.897 |
| Positive HBsAg | 19(38.0%) | 7(20.0%) | 0.096 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 9(18.0%) | 5(14.3%) | 0.771 |
| Tumor size(cm) | 6.7±3.2 | 6.0±1.9 | 0.277 |
| Tumor number(single/multiple) | 1/49 | 5/30 | 0.077 |
| Differentiation(poor/moderate-well) | 38/12 | 23/12 | 0.335 |
| Vascular invasion | 10(20%) | 4(11.4%) | 0.38 |
| Bile duct thrombus | 2(4.0%) | 1(2.9%) | 1 |
| Nerve invasion | 3(6.0%) | 3(8.6%) | 0.687 |
| Positive surgical margin | 4(8.0%) | 2(5.7%) | 1 |
| MVI | 7(14.0%) | 4(11.4%) | 1 |
| Lymphonode involvement | 13(26.0%) | 4(11.4%) | 0.098 |
| Local invasion | 8(16.0%) | 3(8.6%) | 0.514 |
| Satellite lesion | 12(24.0%) | 6(17.1%) | 0.591 |
| Elevated serum CA19-9 | 36(72.0%) | 19(54.3%) | 0.093 |
| The AJCC staging system(early/late) | 20/30 | 6/29 | 0.024 |
| Platelet count(*10^9) | 172±70.4 | 161±70.9 | 0.481 |
| TIBL(umol/l) | 13.7±5.4 | 17.2±29.2 | 0.409 |
| ALT(U/L) | 36.5±41.1 | 33.1±29.2 | 0.68 |
| ALB(g/l) | 41.7±5.0 | 42.2±5.7 | 0.661 |
| Lymphocyte count | 1.4±0.5 | 1.5±0.6 | 0.527 |
HBsAg: hepatitis B virus surface antigen; MVI: microvascular invasion; CA19-9: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; TIBL: total bilirubin; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; ALB: albumin
Univariate and Multivariate Analysis for prognosis of ICC patients after surgery.
| Age | 0.218 | |||||
| Gender(M/F) | 0.518 | |||||
| Positive HBsAg | 0.267 | |||||
| Liver cirrhosis | 0.357 | |||||
| Tumor size(cm) | 0.05 | |||||
| Tumor number(single/multiple) | 0.061 | |||||
| Differentiation(poor/moderate-well) | 0.198 | |||||
| Vascular invasion | 0.032 | 1.964 | 1.056-3.643 | |||
| FoxA2 expression(Low vs. High) | <0.001 | 2.865 | 1.666-4.929 | 2.772 | 1.573-4.886 | <0.001 |
| Positive surgical margin | 0.004 | 4.102 | 1.583-10.628 | 6.1 | 2.145-17.347 | 0.001 |
| MVI | 0.099 | |||||
| Lymphonode involvement | <0.001 | 3.22 | 1.765-5.876 | 2.907 | 1.550-4.454 | 0.001 |
| Local invasion | 0.17 | |||||
| Satellite lesion | 0.003 | 2.738 | 1.336-4.230 | 2.368 | 1.296-4.328 | 0.005 |
| Elevated serum CA19-9 | 0.005 | 2.27 | 1.281-4.021 | |||
| The AJCC staging system(early/late) | <0.001 | 2.607 | 1.523-4.463 | |||
| Platelet count(*10^9) | 0.003 | 1.006 | 1.002-1.010 | |||
| TIBL (umol/l) | 0.836 | |||||
| ALT(U/L) | 0.287 | |||||
| ALB(g/l) | 0.007 | 0.948 | 0.912-0.985 | 0.933 | 0.892-0.933 | 0.002 |
| Lymphocyte count | 0.911 | |||||
Figure 2Establishment of the TAA-induced cholangiocarcinoma model. (A) Diagram of the DNA insertion site in the loxP alleles of FoxA2. The activation of albumin expression led to the abolishment of FoxA2 expression; (B) Electropherogram of tail DNA genotyping; (C, D) Western blotting and immunohistochemistry were performed to confirm the deletion of FoxA2 expression; (E) Gross observation of liver tissues at the indicated time points (Scale bar: 1 cm). Multiple nodes were detected in FoxA2-/- mice, and the liver / body weight ratio was significantly higher in FoxA2-/- mice; (F) The ALP and ALT levels were higher in FoxA2-/- mice based on the serum biochemistry test. ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALT: Alanine amino-transferase; ALB: albumin.
Figure 3Loss of FoxA2 promotes the development of intrahepatic bile duct neoplasms and enhances MAPK-related gene expression. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed remarkable bile duct neoplasm formation in FoxA2-/- mice. Significant liver cirrhosis and proliferation (Ki67 immunohistochemistry) were also observed in the bile duct in FoxA2-/- mice (n=3 each group); (B) Heatmap showing the most differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FoxA2-/- mice and WT mice. (n = 3 samples per group); (C) KEGG analysis of biological processes. Most of these DEGs were clustered in the “MAPK signaling pathway” category, followed by the “Pathways in cancer”, and “PI13K-AKT signaling pathway”, and so on. The bar indicates the P value; the threshold of P = 0.015 is shown; (D) Volcano plot of P values as a function of the weighted fold change for mRNAs; 805 genes were upregulated genes and 154 were down regulated in FoxA2-/- mice compared with WT mice.; (E) the activation of MAPK-signaling-related genes expression in FoxA2-/- mice.
Figure 4The key components of the MAPK signaling pathway were activated in FoxA2 (A, B) IHC and Western blotting analysis of low FoxA2 and high p-ERK1/2, CREB1 and RAS expression in FoxA2-/- mice; © The heatmap shows the activation of key genes in the MAPK signaling pathway in ICC patients. These genes were selected from the KEGG database for MAPK signaling pathways (Supplementary Table 1); (D) The correlation plot shows that low FOXA2 expression was correlated with high expression of genes in the MAPK signaling pathway in ICC patients.
Figure 5The suppression of FoxA2 promotes activation of the MAPK signaling pathway. (A) The effect of FOXA2 suppression in HuCCT1 cells by siFOXA2; (B) Cell proliferation was detected with EdU in ICC cells after suppression of FoxA2; (C) The invasion assay was used to assess the effects of FoxA2 down regulation on ICC cell invasion; (D) The expression of ERK1, P-ERK1/2, CREB1 and RAS in ICC cell lines was detected by Western blot after the suppression of FoxA2.