Literature DB >> 31688997

Classification of Human White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning for Stain-Free Imaging Flow Cytometry.

Maxim Lippeveld1,2, Carly Knill3, Emma Ladlow3,4, Andrew Fuller3, Louise J Michaelis5,6, Yvan Saeys1,2, Andrew Filby3, Daniel Peralta1,2.   

Abstract

Imaging flow cytometry (IFC) produces up to 12 spectrally distinct, information-rich images of single cells at a throughput of 5,000 cells per second. Yet often, cell populations are still studied using manual gating, a technique that has several drawbacks, hence it would be advantageous to replace manual gating with an automated process. Ideally, this automated process would be based on stain-free measurements, as the currently used staining techniques are expensive and potentially confounding. These stain-free measurements originate from the brightfield and darkfield image channels, which capture transmitted and scattered light, respectively. To realize this automated, stain-free approach, advanced machine learning (ML) methods are required. Previous works have successfully tested this approach on cell cycle phase classification with both a classical ML approach based on manually engineered features, and a deep learning (DL) approach. In this work, we compare both approaches extensively on the problem of white blood cell classification. Four human whole blood samples were assayed on an ImageStream-X MK II imaging flow cytometer. Two samples were stained for the identification of eight white blood cell types, while two other sample sets were stained for the identification of resting and active eosinophils. For both data sets, four ML classifiers were evaluated on stain-free imagery with stratified 5-fold cross-validation. On the white blood cell data set, the best obtained results were 0.778 and 0.703 balanced accuracy for classical ML and DL, respectively. On the eosinophil data set, this was 0.871 and 0.856 balanced accuracy. We conclude that classifying cell types based on only stain-free images is possible with all four classifiers. Noteworthy, we also find that the DL approaches tested in this work do not outperform the approaches based on manually engineered features.
© 2019 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. © 2019 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging flow cytometry; label-free, stain-free, deep learning, machine learning, classification, white blood cells, leukocytes, eosinophils.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31688997     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  12 in total

1.  Clinical spectrum of paediatric and adult eosinophilic oesophagitis in the North East of England from 2016 to 2019.

Authors:  Ben Shillitoe; Ji Ching Lee; Mohammed Hussien; Iosif Beintaris; Mark Stothard; Matthew Johnston; Helen Jane Dallal; Louise J Michaelis; Stephen Attwood; Anjan Dhar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-08

2.  Field-Portable Leukocyte Classification Device Based on Lens-Free Shadow Imaging Technique.

Authors:  Dongmin Seo; Euijin Han; Samir Kumar; Eekhyoung Jeon; Myung-Hyun Nam; Hyun Sik Jun; Sungkyu Seo
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

3.  Deepometry, a framework for applying supervised and weakly supervised deep learning to imaging cytometry.

Authors:  Minh Doan; Claire Barnes; Claire McQuin; Juan C Caicedo; Allen Goodman; Anne E Carpenter; Paul Rees
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Learning deep features for dead and living breast cancer cell classification without staining.

Authors:  Gisela Pattarone; Laura Acion; Marina Simian; Roland Mertelsmann; Marie Follo; Emmanuel Iarussi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Deep Learning in Biomedical Optics.

Authors:  Lei Tian; Brady Hunt; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; Ji Yi; Jason T Smith; Marien Ochoa; Xavier Intes; Nicholas J Durr
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-05-20

6.  In Situ Classification of Cell Types in Human Kidney Tissue Using 3D Nuclear Staining.

Authors:  Andre Woloshuk; Suraj Khochare; Aljohara F Almulhim; Andrew T McNutt; Dawson Dean; Daria Barwinska; Michael J Ferkowicz; Michael T Eadon; Katherine J Kelly; Kenneth W Dunn; Mohammad A Hasan; Tarek M El-Achkar; Seth Winfree
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 4.714

7.  Deep-Learning Based Label-Free Classification of Activated and Inactivated Neutrophils for Rapid Immune State Monitoring.

Authors:  Xiwei Huang; Hyungkook Jeon; Jixuan Liu; Jiangfan Yao; Maoyu Wei; Wentao Han; Jin Chen; Lingling Sun; Jongyoon Han
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  In silico-labeled ghost cytometry.

Authors:  Masashi Ugawa; Yoko Kawamura; Keisuke Toda; Kazuki Teranishi; Hikari Morita; Hiroaki Adachi; Ryo Tamoto; Hiroko Nomaru; Keiji Nakagawa; Keiki Sugimoto; Evgeniia Borisova; Yuri An; Yusuke Konishi; Seiichiro Tabata; Soji Morishita; Misa Imai; Tomoiku Takaku; Marito Araki; Norio Komatsu; Yohei Hayashi; Issei Sato; Ryoichi Horisaki; Hiroyuki Noji; Sadao Ota
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Raman image-activated cell sorting.

Authors:  Takanori Iino; Akihiro Isozaki; Mai Yamagishi; Yasutaka Kitahama; Shinya Sakuma; Nao Nitta; Yuta Suzuki; Hiroshi Tezuka; Minoru Oikawa; Fumihito Arai; Takuya Asai; Dinghuan Deng; Hideya Fukuzawa; Misa Hase; Tomohisa Hasunuma; Takeshi Hayakawa; Kei Hiraki; Kotaro Hiramatsu; Yu Hoshino; Mary Inaba; Yuki Inoue; Takuro Ito; Masataka Kajikawa; Hiroshi Karakawa; Yusuke Kasai; Yuichi Kato; Hirofumi Kobayashi; Cheng Lei; Satoshi Matsusaka; Hideharu Mikami; Atsuhiro Nakagawa; Keiji Numata; Tadataka Ota; Takeichiro Sekiya; Kiyotaka Shiba; Yoshitaka Shirasaki; Nobutake Suzuki; Shunji Tanaka; Shunnosuke Ueno; Hiroshi Watarai; Takashi Yamano; Masayuki Yazawa; Yusuke Yonamine; Dino Di Carlo; Yoichiroh Hosokawa; Sotaro Uemura; Takeaki Sugimura; Yasuyuki Ozeki; Keisuke Goda
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Machine learning issues and opportunities in ultrafast particle classification for label-free microflow cytometry.

Authors:  Alessio Lugnan; Emmanuel Gooskens; Jeremy Vatin; Joni Dambre; Peter Bienstman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.