| Literature DB >> 31688937 |
Jason A Somarelli1,2, Amy M Boddy3, Heather L Gardner4, Suzanne Bartholf DeWitt5, Joanne Tuohy6, Kate Megquier7, Maya U Sheth1,2, Shiaowen David Hsu1,2, Jeffrey L Thorne8,9, Cheryl A London4, William C Eward2,5.
Abstract
Despite a considerable expenditure of time and resources and significant advances in experimental models of disease, cancer research continues to suffer from extremely low success rates in translating preclinical discoveries into clinical practice. The continued failure of cancer drug development, particularly late in the course of human testing, not only impacts patient outcomes, but also drives up the cost for those therapies that do succeed. It is clear that a paradigm shift is necessary if improvements in this process are to occur. One promising direction for increasing translational success is comparative oncology-the study of cancer across species, often involving veterinary patients that develop naturally-occurring cancers. Comparative oncology leverages the power of cross-species analyses to understand the fundamental drivers of cancer protective mechanisms, as well as factors contributing to cancer initiation and progression. Clinical trials in veterinary patients with cancer provide an opportunity to evaluate novel therapeutics in a setting that recapitulates many of the key features of human cancers, including genomic aberrations that underly tumor development, response and resistance to treatment, and the presence of comorbidities that can affect outcomes. With a concerted effort from basic scientists, human physicians and veterinarians, comparative oncology has the potential to enhance the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of pipelines for cancer drug discovery and other cancer treatments.Entities:
Keywords: cancer drug discovery; cross-species studies; evolutionary biology; veterinary oncology
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31688937 PMCID: PMC8204703 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msz254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Evol ISSN: 0737-4038 Impact factor: 16.240