Literature DB >> 31688771

The Impact of Plastic Surgery Training on Family Planning and Prenatal Health.

Debra A Bourne1, Wendy Chen, Benjamin K Schilling, Eliza Beth Littleton, Kia M Washington, Carolyn De La Cruz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery trainees who wish to start a family face challenges. This is the first study to collect data directly from residents and fellows to understand issues surrounding childbearing and to propose solutions.
METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, an anonymous survey was distributed to all current plastic surgery residents and fellows in the United States. Data regarding demographics, obstetrical complications, parental leave, breastfeeding, and use of assisted reproductive technology were collected.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 307 trainees, for a resident response rate of 27.0 percent. Mean age of the respondents was 31.7 ± 3.8 years, 58.6 percent were married, and 35.3 percent reported at least one pregnancy for themselves or for their partner. Both male (67.4 percent) and female (76.5 percent) respondents intentionally postponed having children because of career. Women were significantly more likely to report negative stigma attached to pregnancy (70.4 percent versus 51.1 percent; p = 0.003) and plan to delay childbearing until after training. Fifty-six percent of female trainees reported an obstetrical complication. Assisted reproductive technology was used by 19.6 percent of trainees. Mean maternity leave was 5.5 weeks, with 44.4 percent taking less than 6 weeks. Mean paternity leave was 1.2 weeks. Sixty-two percent of women and 51.4 percent of men reported dissatisfaction with leave. Sixty-one percent of female trainees breastfed for 6 months and 19.5 percent continued for 12 months. Lactation facilities were available near operating rooms for 29.4 percent of respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery training may negatively impact fertility, obstetrical health, and breastfeeding practices. The data presented in this article provide the groundwork for identifying areas of concern and potential solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31688771     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Otolaryngology residents' experiences of pregnancy and return to work: A multisite qualitative study.

Authors:  Eve P Champaloux; Anne Starks Acosta; Stacey T Gray; Tanya K Meyer; Regan W Bergmark
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-28

2.  Trends in Fellowship Training across United States Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Academic Faculty.

Authors:  John D Bovill; Zoë K Haffner; Samuel S Huffman; Adaah A Sayyed; Holly D Shan; Areeg A Abu El Hawa; Robert P Slamin; Karen K Evans; David H Song
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-10-17

3.  Disparities in Research during Plastic Surgery Training: How Can We Level the Playing Field?

Authors:  Alexander I Murphy; Joseph A Mellia; Emma K Iaconetti; Paul A Asadourian; Fortunay Diatta; Kevin M Klifto; Martin P Morris; Robyn B Broach; John P Fischer; Paris D Butler
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Parental Leave Policy for Ophthalmology Residents: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study of Program Directors.

Authors:  Kendrick M Wang; Benjamin Lee; Fasika A Woreta; Saraswathy Ramanathan; Eric L Singman; Jing Tian; Divya Srikumaran
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 5.  Pregnancy in physicians: A scoping review.

Authors:  Marianne Casilla-Lennon; Stephanie Hanchuk; Sijin Zheng; David D Kim; Benjamin Press; Justin V Nguyen; Alyssa Grimshaw; Michael S Leapman; Jaime A Cavallo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.565

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.