Literature DB >> 31688382

Perceptions of Psychiatrists Toward the Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: An Online Survey Study From India.

Sandeep Grover1, Swapnajeet Sahoo, Aseem Mehra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
BACKGROUND: Despite proven benefits of long-acting injectables (LAIs), these are frequently underused by the psychiatrists. Accordingly, this study aimed to explore the perceptions of psychiatrists toward the use of LAI antipsychotics in their routine clinical practice. METHODS/PROCEDURE: An online e-mail survey was conducted by using Survey Monkey platform.
RESULTS: A total of 622 psychiatrists with a mean age of 41 years who were in psychiatric practice for approximately 14 years participated in the survey. Participants reported using LAI, mainly for patients with schizophrenia, with LAI prescribed to approximately one-tenth (9.30%) of their patients in acute phase of illness and in one-fifth (18.42%) of patients in stabilization/stable phase. Fluphenazine decanoate (32.7%) was the most commonly used LAI followed by flupenthixol decanoate (19.5%), haloperidol decanoate (17.8%), and olanzapine pamoate (11.1%). The most common reasons for starting LAI were history of medication (100%) and treatment (80.5%) nonadherence, followed by having frequent relapses/exacerbations of symptoms (54.8%). Overall, more than half of the participants felt the level of acceptance of LAI among patients offered to be quite reasonable (54.3%), and mostly, LAIs were used as combination therapy with oral antipsychotics (73.6%). Despite all these, approximately three-fifths (59%) of the participants reported that they underuse LAI to a certain extent, with most common reasons that deter them from using LAI being the cost (55.45%), lack of interest of patients in receiving LAI (42.9%), lack of regular availability (41.3%), and patients being scared of receiving injectables (41.2%). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The LAI antipsychotics despite having several benefits are still underused by a substantial proportion of practicing psychiatrists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31688382     DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  5 in total

1.  Reasons for initiating long-acting antipsychotics in psychiatric practice: findings from the STAR Network Depot Study.

Authors:  Corrado Barbui; Federico Bertolini; Francesco Bartoli; Carmela Calandra; Camilla Callegari; Giuseppe Carrà; Armando D'Agostino; Claudio Lucii; Giovanni Martinotti; Daniele Mastromo; Daniele Moretti; Emiliano Monzani; Matteo Porcellana; Davide Prestia; Giovanni Ostuzzi
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-12-22

2.  The Willingness of Community Psychiatric Management Physicians to Preferentially Recommend Long-Acting Injections in Beijing.

Authors:  Lefan Jin; Yun Chen; Junli Zhu; Qingzhi Huang; Bin Li; Ying Xu; Rui Xi; Wei Lu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 3.  Antipsychotic-Related Stigma and the Impact on Treatment Choices: A Systematic Review and Framework Synthesis.

Authors:  Michael Townsend; Kristin Pareja; Amy Buchanan-Hughes; Emma Worthington; David Pritchett; Malaak Brubaker; Christy Houle; Tenna Natascha Mose; Heidi Waters
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Attitudes and perceptions about the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics among behavioral health practitioners.

Authors:  Shaina Schwartz; Christina Carilli; Taimur Mian; Laura Ruekert; Archana Kumar
Journal:  Ment Health Clin       Date:  2022-08-23

5.  Evidence-Based Expert Consensus Regarding Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia from the Taiwanese Society of Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology (TSBPN).

Authors:  Kai-Chun Yang; Yin-To Liao; Yen-Kuang Yang; Shih-Ku Lin; Chih-Sung Liang; Ya-Mei Bai
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 5.749

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.