Literature DB >> 31687826

Manganese-Catalyzed Electrochemical Deconstructive Chlorination of Cycloalkanols via Alkoxy Radicals.

Benjamin D W Allen1, Mishra Deepak Hareram1, Alex C Seastram1, Tom McBride1, Thomas Wirth2, Duncan L Browne1, Louis C Morrill1.   

Abstract

A manganese-catalyzed electrochemical deconstructive chlorination of cycloalkanols has been developed. This electrochemical method provides access to alkoxy radicals from alcohols and exhibits a broad substrate scope, with various cyclopropanols and cyclobutanols converted into synthetically useful β- and γ-chlorinated ketones (40 examples). Furthermore, the combination of recirculating flow electrochemistry and continuous inline purification was employed to access products on a gram scale.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31687826      PMCID: PMC7007279          DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Org Lett        ISSN: 1523-7052            Impact factor:   6.005


Alkoxy radicals are highly transient species that exhibit diverse reactivity, including hydrogen atom transfer,[1] addition to π systems,[2] and β-scission processes (Scheme A).[3] The generation of alkoxy radicals directly from aliphatic alcohols is challenging, partly due to the high dissociation energy of RO–H bonds (∼105 kcal/mol).[2b] As such, traditional methods for alkoxy radical generation involve the homolysis of weak oxygen-heteroatom bonds within prefunctionalized radical precursors in combination with radical initiators and/or thermal or photochemical activation (Scheme B).[1,2] Alternatively, transition metal salts can be employed in combination with stoichiometric oxidants (e.g., K2S2O8 or hypervalent iodine reagents) for the generation of alkoxy radicals.[4] Recent advances have developed photocatalytic approaches for alkoxy radical generation employing various radical precursors[5] including peroxides,[6]N-alkoxyphthalimides,[7]N-alkoxypyridiniums,[8]N-alkoxybenzimidazoles,[9]N-alkoxytriazoliums,[10] and unprotected alcohols.[11] Despite these important advances, many existing approaches require the use of prefunctionalized substrates, (super)stoichiometric reagents (generating waste/byproducts), and/or precious metal (photo)catalysts.
Scheme 1

Context and Outline of Electrochemical Strategy

Organic electrochemistry represents one of the cleanest possible chemical processing technologies,[12] which has recently undergone a renaissance due partly to the increasing availability of standardized batch and flow electrochemical reactors.[13] By careful tuning of electrochemical parameters, specific single electron transfer processes can be targeted, accessing powerful radical intermediates.[14] Despite these characteristics, the development of electrochemical methods for the generation of alkoxy radicals from alcohols has received little attention and remains largely limited to the generation of methoxy radicals,[15] which requires expensive boron-doped diamond or platinum anodes.[16] To this end, herein we report the manganese-catalyzed electrochemical deconstructive chlorination of cycloalkanols via alkoxy radical intermediates,[17] accessing synthetically useful β- and γ-chlorinated ketones (Scheme C). Furthermore, by employing microreactor technology and recirculating flow, the electrochemical method can be performed on gram scale, with continuous inline purification incorporated. To commence our studies, 1-phenylcyclobutan-1-ol 1 was selected as the model substrate (Table ). After extensive optimization,[18] it was found that an electrochemical system composed of MnCl2.4H2O (10 mol %) as catalyst,[19] MgCl2 (5 equiv) as chloride source, and LiClO4 as supporting electrolyte in MeCN/AcOH (7:1, [1] = 0.05 M) using galvanostatic conditions (i = 10 mA, janode = 7.8 mA/cm2, Q = 3.73 F/mol) and graphite electrodes at 25 °C for 3 h under N2, enabled the deconstructive chlorination of 1, giving γ-chlorinated ketone 2 in 82% NMR yield (entry 1). No conversion occurs in the absence of electricity or the manganese catalyst (entries 2 and 3). Employing a constant cell potential (Ecell = 2.4 V) or variation of the current (i = 12.5 mA or 7.5 mA) lowered the NMR yield of 2 (entries 4–6). Employing TBAPF6 as electrolyte (entry 7) or substituting the graphite cathode for Pt foil or Ni plate (entries 8 and 9) each had a negligible impact on conversion. However, upon evaluating alternative Mn(II) salts (entries 10 and 11), it was found that 97% conversion was obtained using Mn(OTf)2 as catalyst, which was adopted for further optimization. Employing LiCl or NaCl as the chloride source was detrimental to conversion, presumably due to decreased solubility in MeCN/AcOH (entries 12 and 13).[20] Gratifyingly, the quantities of MgCl2 and Mn(OTf)2 could be lowered to 2 equiv and 5 mol %, respectively, without significant reduction in conversion (entries 14 and 15). A Faradaic efficiency of 67% was obtained when 2 F/mol of charge was passed (entry 16), which indicated that most of the electricity passing through the cell is utilized productively.
Table 1

Optimization of Electrochemical Processa

entryvariation from “standard” conditionsyieldb (%)
1none82
2no electricity<2
3no MnCl2.4H2O<2
4Ecell = 2.4 V66
5i = 12.5 mA, janode = 9.8 mA/cm274
6i = 7.5 mA, janode = 5.9 mA/cm280
7TBAPF6 instead of LiClO482
8Pt foil cathode instead of graphite82
9Ni plate cathode instead of graphite75
10Mn(OAc)2·4H2O instead of MnCl2·4H2O82
11Mn(OTf)2 instead of MnCl2·4H2O97 (78)
12cLiCl instead of MgCl264
13cNaCl instead of MgCl2<2
14cMgCl2 (2 equiv)76
15cMn(OTf)2 (5 mol %)75
16c,dQ = 2 F/mol67

Reactions performed with 0.3 mmol of cyclobutanol 1 using the ElectraSyn 2.0 batch electrochemical reactor. [1] = 0.05 M.

Yield after 3 h as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as the internal standard. Isolated yield given in parentheses.

Mn(OTf)2 as catalyst.

96 min reaction time.

Reactions performed with 0.3 mmol of cyclobutanol 1 using the ElectraSyn 2.0 batch electrochemical reactor. [1] = 0.05 M. Yield after 3 h as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as the internal standard. Isolated yield given in parentheses. Mn(OTf)2 as catalyst. 96 min reaction time. The full scope of the electrochemical process was explored starting with the deconstructive chlorination of cyclobutanols to form γ-functionalized ketones (Scheme A). From the outset, it was found that 1-arylcyclobutan-1-ols containing aromatic systems with electron-releasing groups at the 2- or 4-positions (e.g., 4-tBu) or extended π systems (e.g., 4-Ph) undergo decomposition using the optimized reaction conditions (Table , entry 11). This instability was attributed to ionization of the C–OH bond in the presence of Brønsted and/or Lewis acids, forming stabilized carbocations that are unproductive for the desired transformation. In such cases, this issue was addressed by employing syringe pump addition of the substrate over 2 h and using TBAOAc as the supporting electrolyte. With a choice of two suitable reaction conditions in hand, a variety of 1-arylcyclobutan-1-ols were converted to the corresponding γ-chlorinated ketone products in good to excellent isolated yields (products 2–20). Within the aryl unit, various alkyl and aryl substitution was tolerated at the 4-, 3-, and 2-positions in addition to halides and electron-withdrawing substituents (e.g., 4-CF3). The electrochemical method exhibits good functional group tolerance as demonstrated by the presence of aldehyde, carboxylic acid, methyl ester, primary amide, nitrile, benzylic primary alcohol, and silyl ether functionalities present within products 14–20. A selection of 1-alkylcyclobutan-1-ols were also converted into the corresponding γ-chlorinated ketones in good isolated yields (products 21–26). Benzo-fused cyclobutanols participated in deconstructive chlorination, giving benzyl chloride products 27–31, including the formation of 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10-membered rings. This strategy was also applied to the formation of disubstituted cycloheptane 32 in 77% isolated yield. Additional substitution at the 2- and 3-positions of the cyclobutanol was tolerated, accessing γ-chlorinated ketones 33–35 in high yields. We also investigated the deconstructive chlorination of cyclopropanols (Scheme B). Gratifyingly, it was found that a representative selection of 1-arylcyclopropan-1-ols and 1-alkylcyclopropan-1-ols could be readily converted to the corresponding β-chlorinated ketones in good yields (36–39). Additional substitution is tolerated within the cyclopropanol, giving secondary radical derived product 40 as the major regioisomer. Furthermore, bicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-1-ol was converted to 3-chlorocycloheptan-1-one 41 in 48% isolated yield. At the current stage of development, the electrochemical method does not tolerate larger ring sizes with reduced ring strain. For example, despite assessing various reaction conditions, 1-phenylcyclopentan-1-ol underwent decomposition, whereas 1-phenethylcyclopentan-1-ol was unreactive.[21]
Scheme 2

Substrate Scope: Batch and Flow Electrochemistry

Reactions performed with 0.3 mmol of cycloalkanol using the ElectraSyn 2.0 batch electrochemical reactor with isolated yields after chromatographic purification quoted unless stated otherwise.

Cycloalkanol was added over 2 h via syringe pump, TBAOAc (0.1 M) as electrolyte.

TBAOAc (0.1 M) as electrolyte.

Yield as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as the internal standard.

6 h.

Substrate Scope: Batch and Flow Electrochemistry

Reactions performed with 0.3 mmol of cycloalkanol using the ElectraSyn 2.0 batch electrochemical reactor with isolated yields after chromatographic purification quoted unless stated otherwise. Cycloalkanol was added over 2 h via syringe pump, TBAOAc (0.1 M) as electrolyte. TBAOAc (0.1 M) as electrolyte. Yield as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as the internal standard. 6 h. In order to demonstrate scalability, the batch process was translated to a flow electrochemical setup.[22] By employing the commercially available Ammonite8 flow electroreactor,[23] a variety of reaction parameters were evaluated including electrolyte loading, temperature, solvent ratio, residence time, charge, and mixing efficiency (Scheme C). However, by using MnCl2·4H2O (10 mol %) as catalyst, the conversion to 2 could not be increased beyond 20% using single-pass flow electrochemistry.[18] The yield was increased by applying the optimized reaction parameters to a recirculating flow electrochemical setup, which provided access to 2 in 84% isolated yield (Scheme D).[24] Advantageously, due to the decreased distance between the electrodes in flow, a supporting electrolyte was not required. Furthermore, by employing a 6-port 2-position switching valve, the flow could be redirected from recirculation to continuous inline purification (Scheme E). Once the electrochemical reaction was complete, the valve was switched from position 1 to position 2 to redirect the flow into the path of workup solvents. The flow was passed through a mixing unit before entering a liquid/liquid phase separator containing a hydrophobic membrane that allowed separation of the organic layer, which was subsequently dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to provide 1.2 g of product. This flow setup, which combines recirculating flow electrochemistry and continuous inline purification for the first time, might be suitable for >1 g scale processing by increasing reactor volume and operation time. Cyclic voltammetry was employed in order to gain mechanistic insight into the electrochemical process.[18] In accordance with the literature,[19d] the combination of Mn(OTf)2 and MgCl2 produced a new quasi-reversible redox event at ∼0.8 V vs Fc/Fc+,[25] which provided evidence for the generation of a Mn(III)X2Cl species from [Mn(II)X2Cl]−. Furthermore, an increase in the oxidation current was observed upon addition of 1-phenylcyclobutan-1-ol 1, which suggested that Mn(III)X2Cl is consumed by 1. When methyl ether cyclobutane 42 was employed as the substrate using the standard electrochemical reaction conditions, no γ-chlorinated ketone 2 was observed, with 82% starting material recovered (Scheme A). This indicated that the proposed Mn(III)X2Cl species does not promote cyclobutane ring opening in the absence of a hydroxyl functional group. As such, a plausible reaction mechanism initiates with the formation of [Mn(II)X2Cl]− from Mn(II)X2 and MgCl2, which is oxidized at the anode to form Mn(III)X2Cl (Scheme B). This intermediate undergoes ligand exchange with the cycloalkanol to form a Mn(III) alkoxide, with subsequent homolysis generating an alkoxy radical, which can undergo reversible β-scission. Alternatively, the Mn(III) alkoxide may undergo reversible β-scission, rather than a free alkoxy radical intermediate. Trapping of the transient primary carbon-centered radical with the persistent Mn(III)X2Cl species forms a new C–Cl bond.[26] Hydrogen gas is generated via proton reduction at the cathode.
Scheme 3

Mechanistic Studies

Yield as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as the internal standard.

Mechanistic Studies

Yield as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as the internal standard. In conclusion, we have developed a new electrochemical method for alkoxy radical generation from alcohols and utilized this for the manganese-catalyzed electrochemical deconstructive chlorination of cycloalkanols. The method is applicable across various cyclopropanols and cyclobutanols, accessing a broad range of synthetically useful β- and γ-chlorinated ketones (40 examples). Furthermore, the combination of recirculating flow electrochemistry and continuous inline purification was employed to access products on gram scale. Ongoing studies are focused on further applications of earth-abundant transition metals in synthetic organic electrochemistry, and these results will be reported in due course.[27]
  52 in total

1.  Donor-Acceptor Complex Enables Alkoxyl Radical Generation for Metal-Free C(sp3 )-C(sp3 ) Cleavage and Allylation/Alkenylation.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yang Li; Ruoyu Xu; Yiyun Chen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Late-stage functionalization of biologically active heterocycles through photoredox catalysis.

Authors:  Daniel A Dirocco; Kevin Dykstra; Shane Krska; Petr Vachal; Donald V Conway; Matthew Tudge
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Synthetic Organic Electrochemical Methods Since 2000: On the Verge of a Renaissance.

Authors:  Ming Yan; Yu Kawamata; Phil S Baran
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Synthetic Organic Electrochemistry: Calling All Engineers.

Authors:  Ming Yan; Yu Kawamata; Phil S Baran
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Generation of Alkoxyl Radicals by Photoredox Catalysis Enables Selective C(sp(3))-H Functionalization under Mild Reaction Conditions.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yang Li; Fuyuan Zhang; Chenchen Hu; Yiyun Chen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 6.  Recent Advances in Ring-Opening Functionalization of Cycloalkanols by C-C σ-Bond Cleavage.

Authors:  Xinxin Wu; Chen Zhu
Journal:  Chem Rec       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 6.771

7.  Visible-light-induced alkoxyl radical generation for inert chemical bond cleavage/functionalization.

Authors:  Kunfang Jia; Yiyun Chen
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Electrocatalytic Radical Dichlorination of Alkenes with Nucleophilic Chlorine Sources.

Authors:  Niankai Fu; Gregory S Sauer; Song Lin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Visible-Light-Induced Alkoxyl Radical Generation Enables Selective C(sp(3))-C(sp(3)) Bond Cleavage and Functionalizations.

Authors:  Kunfang Jia; Fuyuan Zhang; Hanchu Huang; Yiyun Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Photoinduced Remote Functionalisations by Iminyl Radical Promoted C-C and C-H Bond Cleavage Cascades.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Dauncey; Sara P Morcillo; James J Douglas; Nadeem S Sheikh; Daniele Leonori
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Photochemical and Electrochemical Applications of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Organic Synthesis.

Authors:  Philip R D Murray; James H Cox; Nicholas D Chiappini; Casey B Roos; Elizabeth A McLoughlin; Benjamin G Hejna; Suong T Nguyen; Hunter H Ripberger; Jacob M Ganley; Elaine Tsui; Nick Y Shin; Brian Koronkiewicz; Guanqi Qiu; Robert R Knowles
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Electrochemical Deconstructive Functionalization of Cycloalkanols via Alkoxy Radicals Enabled by Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer.

Authors:  Mishra Deepak Hareram; Albara A M A El Gehani; James Harnedy; Alex C Seastram; Andrew C Jones; Matthew Burns; Thomas Wirth; Duncan L Browne; Louis C Morrill
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 3.  Catalytic generation of alkoxy radicals from unfunctionalized alcohols.

Authors:  Elaine Tsui; Huaiju Wang; Robert R Knowles
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 9.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.