| Literature DB >> 31687518 |
Dan-Dan Guo1, Le-Qin Cheng1, Yue-Wei Zhang1, Hong-Chao Zheng2, Hui-Yong Ma3, Ling Li4.
Abstract
Ginsenoside-Rg5, which is derived from high temperature-processed ginseng, exhibits beneficial health effects. In the present study, ginsenoside-Rg5 was directly and rapidly prepared through the extraction of ginseng fibrous root powder (GFRP) at atmospheric pressure. The results showed that the highest extraction yield (3.79%) was obtained under optimal conditions (extraction temperature of 85 °C, acid concentration of 0.06 mol/L, sample to solvent ratio of 1:55 g/mL and ethanol concentration of 95% after 4 h). The current method integrates the extraction of original saponins and the modification of the saponins to rare ginsenosides Rg5, which was more simpler operation, more milder preparation condition and more efficient.Entities:
Keywords: Extraction; Ginseng fibrous root powder; Ginsenoside-Rg5; Hydrochloric acid; Natural product chemistry; Natural product synthesis; Preparation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687518 PMCID: PMC6820263 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Structure of original ginsenosides and rare ginsenoside Rg5. A: Original protopanaxadiol ginsenosides; B: Original protopanaxatriol ginsenosides; C: Ginsenoside Rg5.
Fig. 2Preparation pathway of ginsenoside Rg5 from ginseng.
Fig. 3Effect of different factors on extraction yield of ginsenoside Rg5. A: extraction temperature; B: acid concentration; C: solid/liquid ratio; D: concentration of ethanol; E: extraction time.
Fig. 4HPLC analysis of ginsenoside Rg5 by one-step method (extraction and preparation) from GFRP. A: Ginsenoside standards; B: Original major ginsenoside composition in GFRP; C: Rare ginsenoside composition after treated GFRP through our one-step method.
13C-NMR data of compound 1(Pyridine-d5).
| C | Rg5 | Compound 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39.17 | 39.26 |
| 2 | 28.00 | 28.11 |
| 3 | 88.82 | 88.90 |
| 4 | 40.14 | 40.24 |
| 5 | 56.29 | 56.38 |
| 6 | 18.33 | 18.44 |
| 7 | 35.24 | 35.34 |
| 8 | 39.60 | 39.71 |
| 9 | 50.66 | 50.76 |
| 10 | 36.91 | 37.01 |
| 11 | 32.10 | 32.23 |
| 12 | 72.49 | 72.57 |
| 13 | 50.33 | 50.45 |
| 14 | 50.91 | 51.01 |
| 15 | 32.54 | 32.64 |
| 16 | 26.64 | 26.75 |
| 17 | 50.80 | 50.90 |
| 18 | 16.35 | 16.46 |
| 19 | 16.49 | 16.60 |
| 20 | 140.06 | 140.16 |
| 21 | 13.07 | 13.18 |
| 22 | 123.21 | 123.21 |
| 23 | 27.35 | 27.46 |
| 24 | 123.54 | 123.53 |
| 25 | 131.16 | 131.25 |
| 26 | 25.60 | 25.72 |
| 27 | 17.66 | 17.74 |
| 28 | 28.73 | 28.85 |
| 29 | 15.72 | 15.82 |
| 30 | 16.92 | 17.02 |
| 1′ | 105.00 | 105.13 |
| 2′ | 83.31 | 83.44 |
| 3′ | 78.13 | 78.28 |
| 4′ | 71.50 | 71.60 |
| 5′ | 77.82 | 77.94 |
| 6′ | 62.58 | 62.66 |
| 1″ | 105.91 | 106.06 |
| 2″ | 77.00 | 77.16 |
| 3″ | 78.21 | 78.32 |
| 4″ | 71.53 | 71.60 |
| 5″ | 77.98 | 78.13 |
| 6″ | 62.73 | 62.83 |
Ref. Park et al.(2002).