| Literature DB >> 31687439 |
Kathleen Joyce D Carillo1,2,3, Danni Wu3, Su-Ching Lin3, Shen-Long Tsai4, Jiun-Jie Shie3, Der-Lii M Tzou3,5.
Abstract
We here reported the 1H/13C chemical shifts, binding affinity and binding free energy of 1,4-pregnadiene-11β,17α,21-triol-3,20-dione (Prednisolone; Prd) interacting with metal cations. Six different Prd/Ni or Co mixtures were examined at different molar ratios (1:0, 1:0.1, 1:0.2, 1:0.3, 1:0.4 and 1:0.5). In this analysis, the 1H and 13C chemical shifts were measured for the Prd/cation mixtures using a Bruker AV 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany), equipped with a 5 mm z-gradient Prodigy BBO 500 MHz probehead at 298 K, and simulation of the 1H spectra were determined from the Daisy software package (Bruker BioSpin GmbH). Binding affinity and free energy values were deduced from the 13C NMR peak intensities involved in the cation interaction, for more insight on the steroid/cation interactions please see Magnesium and Calcium Reveal Different Chelating Effects in a Steroid Compound: A Model Study of Prednisolone Using NMR Spectroscopy [1].Entities:
Keywords: Binding affinity; Cation binding; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Prednisolone
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687439 PMCID: PMC6820118 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
1H chemical shift assignments of Prd in the presence of metal cations.a,b
| Proton | 1H chemical shifts (ppm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co2+ | Ni2+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | |
| 1 | 7.433 | 7.482 | 7.461 | 7.484 |
| 2 | 6.180 | 6.256 | 6.230 | 6.254 |
| 4 | 5.932 | 6.014 | 5.986 | 6.011 |
| 6α (ax) | 2.318 | 2.383 | 2.354 | 2.374 |
| 6β (eq) | 2.555 | 2.660 | 2.631 | 2.649 |
| 7α (eq) | 1.075 | 1.138 | 1.107 | 1.124 |
| 7β (eq) | 2.089 | 2.163 | 2.141 | 2.162 |
| 8β (ax) | 2.115 | 2.185 | 2.161 | 2.173 |
| 9α (ax) | 0.963 | 1.022 | 0.991 | 1.006 |
| 11β (eq) | 4.358 | 4.413 | 4.388 | 4.407 |
| 12α (ax) | 1.573 | 1.609 | 1.589 | 1.605 |
| 12β (eq) | 1.958 | 2.006 | 1.972 | 1.998 |
| 14α (ax) | 1.665 | 1.725 | 1.701 | 1.731 |
| 15α (ax) | 1.711 | 1.792 | 1.756 | 1.783 |
| 15β (eq) | 1.353 | 1.440 | 1.408 | 1.440 |
| 16α (eq) | 1.393 | 1.475 | 1.438 | 1.528 |
| 16β (ax) | 2.601 | 2.728 | 2.690 | 2.716 |
| Me-18 | 1.439 | 1.500 | 1.472 | 1.484 |
| Me-19 | 0.825 | 0.923 | 0.888 | 0.933 |
| 21a | 4.393 | 4.266 | 4.240 | 4.376 |
| 21b | 4.732 | 4.631 | 4.605 | 4.772 |
The sample was dissolved in CD3OD. 1H chemical shifts are in units of ppm referenced to the d4-methanol resonance at 4.87 ppm, within an uncertainty of ±0.001 ppm.
Solution 1H NMR chemical shift assignments of Prd in the presence of CoCl2(5 mM), or NiCl2(5 mM), MgCl2(84 mM) or CaCl2(84 mM) determined from HSQC and COSY experiments. The assignments of Prd/Mg2+and Prd/Ca2+ reported previously are listed for comparison [1].
13C chemical shift assignments of prednisolone in the presence of metal cations.a
| Carbon | 13C chemical shifts (ppm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co2+ | Ni2+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | |
| C1 | 160.23 | 160.32 | 160.35 | 160.44 |
| C2 | 128.00 | 128.17 | 127.92 | 127.96 |
| C3 | 189.78 | 189.48 | 189.14 | 189.17 |
| C4 | 122.86 | 122.82 | 122.59 | 122.64 |
| C5 | 174.90 | 174.99 | 175.03 | 175.14 |
| C6 | 33.34 | 33.45 | 33.34 | 33.34 |
| C7 | 35.69 | 35.83 | 35.73 | 35.72 |
| C8 | 32.79 | 32.93 | 32.82 | 32.84 |
| C9 | 57.43 | 57.58 | 57.48 | 57.45 |
| C10 | 46.16 | 46.29 | 46.22 | 46.24 |
| C11 | 70.86 | 70.99 | 70.88 | 70.83 |
| C12 | 40.70 | 40.82 | 40.70 | 40.61 |
| C13 | 48.68 | NA | NA | NA |
| C14 | 52.94 | 53.06 | 52.94 | 53.00 |
| C15 | 24.96 | 25.01 | 25.01 | 25.02 |
| C16 | 34.61 | 34.76 | 34.67 | 34.87 |
| C17 | 90.40 | 90.53 | 90.42 | 90.36 |
| C18 | 17.79 | 17.94 | 17.85 | 17.91 |
| C19 | 21.65 | 21.80 | 21.70 | 21.69 |
| C20 | 214.40 | 213.10 | 213.14 | 216.19 |
| C21 | 67.42 | 67.89 | 67.78 | 68.58 |
The sample was dissolved in CD3OD. 13C chemical shifts are in units of ppm referenced to the d4-methanol resonance (methyl) at 49.15 ppm, within an uncertainty of ±0.01 ppm.
The13C chemical shifts of Prd were assigned in the presence of CoCl2(5 mM), or NiCl2(5 mM), MgCl2(84 mM) or CaCl2(84 mM), respectively. The assignments of Prd/Mg2+and Prd/Ca2+ reported previously are listed for comparison [1].
NA: Due to signal overlapping with solvent peak, the13C chemical shift is not available.
Characterization of cation chelation induces shifting effects of Prd in the presence of metal cations.a
| Metal cation induced shifting effect (M−1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atom | Co2+ | Ni2+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | Atom | Co2+ | Ni2+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ |
| H2 | −13.83 | −3.93 | −0.56 | −0.18 | C2 | 250. | 217. | −0.55 | −0.51 |
| H4 | −14.40 | −4.01 | −0.58 | −0.19 | C4 | 263. | 227. | −0.49 | −0.14 |
| H15α | −13.78 | −4.35 | −0.60 | −0.25 | – | – | – | – | – |
| H15β | −13.15 | −4.64 | −0.60 | −0.22 | – | – | – | – | – |
| H16α | −13.14 | −5.23 | −0.57 | 0.30 | C16 | −28. | −8. | −0.41 | 1.50 |
| H16β | −17.02 | −4.04 | −0.60 | −0.33 | – | – | – | – | – |
| – | – | – | – | – | C17 | 86. | −121. | −0.36 | −0.77 |
| – | – | – | – | – | C20 | 89. | −112. | 1.45 | 36.7 |
| H21 | 14.25 | −3.01 | −0.51 | 2.05/0.48 | C21 | −69. | −105. | 0.30 | 7.50 |
The metal cation induced shifting effect of Prd/Mg2+and Prd/Ca2+reported previously are listed for comparison [1], for Prd/Mg2+ and Prd/Ca2+ spectra see Supplementary Figs. S1–S4.
Cation binding affinity and binding free energy deduced from 13C NMR signals of Prd/metal cation complexes.a
| Binding affinity | Binding free energy (kJ/mol) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co2+( × 102 M−1) | Ni2+( × 102 M−1) | Mg2+(M−1) | Co2+ | Ni2+ | Mg2+ | |
| C2 (C3) | 40.6 ± 2.0 | 18.0 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.1 | −20.6 ± 1.0 | −18.6 ± 0.6 | −1.7 ± 0.1 |
| C4 (C5) | 40.9 ± 2.7 | 15.0 ± 1.0 | 13.3 ± 2.3 | −20.6 ± 1.4 | −18.1 ± 1.2 | −6.4 ± 1.1 |
| C17 | 113.0 ± 6.6 | 35.8 ± 4.4 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | −23.1 ± 1.5 | −20.3 ± 0.3 | −3.3 ± 0.1 |
| C20 | 135.0 ± 7.3 | 79.4 ± 4.6 | 19.1 ± 0.1 | −23.6 ± 1.3 | −22.3 ± 1.3 | −7.3 ± 0.3 |
| C21 | 45.0 ± 2.4 | 75.3 ± 3.0 | 14.7 ± 0.2 | −20.8 ± 1.1 | −22.1 ± 0.9 | −3.6 ± 0.2 |
The binding affinities were deduced from the curve fitting analysis of the Prd/Co2+ and Prd/Ni2+complexes [3]. The binding free energies were calculated from binding affinity using the free energy equation ΔG = -RTlnKd, in which R is gas constant, T absolute temperature and Kd is the binding affinity.
The binding affinity or binding free energy deduced from C3, C5, C17, C20 and C21 signals of Prd/Mg2+ mixtures reported previously are listed for comparison [1].
Specifications Table
| Subject area | Chemistry, Biochemistry |
| More specific subject area | Steroids, Cortisone, Steroidal drugs |
| Type of data | Table, NMR spectra |
| How data was acquired | Bruker AV 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) |
| Data format | Analyzed and raw data |
| Experimental factors | Prednisolone incubated with metal cation at different molar ratios |
| Experimental features | Binding affinity constant and binding energy were determined using 13C peak intensity of Prednisolone measured in the presence of cations |
| Data source location | Taipei, Taiwan |
| Data accessibility | Analyzed: Within the Data in Brief article |
| Related research article | Carillo, K. D., Wu, D., Lin, S. C., Tsai, S. L., Shie, J. J., & Tzou, D. L. M. (2019). Magnesium and Calcium Reveal Different Chelating Effects in a Steroid Compound: A Model Study of Prednisolone Using NMR Spectroscopy. Steroids, 108429. |
The cation binding data are useful for corticosteroid drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic analysis Chemical biologists and medicinal chemists could benefit from the cation/Prednisolone chelation dataset Our data can be used for assessing adverse effects upon treatment of Prednisolone as well as other corticosteroid related drugs in animal models Cation binding datasets are physiologically valuable for corticosteroid drug developments to avoid cation interaction |