| Literature DB >> 31687399 |
Dariane C Pereira1, Luciano Z Goldani2.
Abstract
We evaluated a rapid bacterial identification (rID) and a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion (rAST) from positive blood culture to overcome the limitations of the conventional methods and reduce the turnaround time in bloodstream infection diagnostics. The study included hemocultures flagged as positive by bacT/ALERT®, identification by MALDI-TOF MS, and rAST. The results were compared to identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results by current standard methods, after 24 h incubation. For rAST categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), and minor errors (mE) were calculated. A total of 524 bacterial samples isolated from blood cultures were obtained, including 246 Gram-negative (GN) and 278 Gram-positive (GP) aerobes. The overall concordance of rID was 88.6%, and it was highest among GN (96%). A total of 2196 and 1476 antimicrobial agent comparisons were obtained for GN and GP, respectively. Evaluation of rAST, CA, VME, ME, and mE disclosed 97.7, 0.7, 0.5, and 1.1% for GN and 98.0, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.8% for GP, respectively. Meropenem CA, VME, and ME were 98.3, 0.5, and 0.5%, respectively; mE was not observed. Oxacillin CA, ME, and mE were 97.4, 1.6, and 0.6%, respectively; VME was not observed. Overall, kappa scores of the results of the comparisons demonstrated the high agreement between rAST and the standard method. Identification and AST of aerobic bacteria from positive blood cultures after a short period of incubation on solid blood agar is a fast and reliable method that may improve the management of bloodstream infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687399 PMCID: PMC6794959 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8041746
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Identification performance of rapid bacterial identification (rID) versus the standard bacterial identification method (sID).
| Organism ID by the current standard method |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concordance level | ||||
|
| Species | Genus | No. Id | |
| Overall | 524 | 459 (87.3) | 466 (88.6) | 58 (11) |
| Gram-negative bacteria | 246 | 235 (96) | 235 (96) | 11 (4) |
| | 100 | 96 (96) | 96 (96) | 4 (4) |
| | 67 | 66 (99) | 66 (99) | 1 (4) |
| | 15 | 13 (87) | 13 (87) | 2 (13) |
| | 6 | 6 (100) | 6 (100) | 0 |
| | 5 | 5 (100) | 5 (100) | 0 |
| | 4 | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 0 |
| | 3 | 3 (100) | 3 (100) | 0 |
| | 2 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) |
| | 1 | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 0 |
| | 22 | 22 (100) | 22 (100) | 0 |
| | 14 | 13 (93) | 13 (93) | 1 (7) |
| | 4 | 3 (75) | 3 (75) | 1 (25) |
| | 3 | 3 (100) | 3 (100) | 0 |
| Gram-positive bacteria | ||||
| Staphylococci | 278 | 224 (81) | 231 (83) | 47 (17) |
| | 73 | 72 (99) | 72 (99) | 1 (1) |
| | 205 | 153 (75) | 160 (78) | 45 (22) |
Concordance rate for species level and genus level and nonreliable identification by Vitek MS system.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing performance of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (rAST) compared with the standard method (sAST).
| Antimicrobial agents | CA (%) | VME (%) | ME (%) | mE (%) | Kappa score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Amikacin | 98.3 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 0.96 |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanate | 98.1 | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.1) | 0.95 |
| Ampicillin | 97.0 | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 4 (2.2) | 0.85 |
| Ampicillin-sulbactam | 97.8 | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 8 (4.4) | 0.93 |
| Cefepime | 96.9 | 2 (1.1) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 0.97 |
| Ceftazidime | 97.2 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.1) | 0.96 |
| Cefuroxime | 97.2 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.1) | 0.93 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 97.8 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 0.94 |
| Gentamicin | 97.5 | 2 (1.1) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 0.95 |
| Meropenem | 98.3 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 0.97 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 93.0 | 4 (2.2) | 1 (0.5) | 5 (2.7) | 0.90 |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 98.3 | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.99 |
| Total | 97.7 | 15 (0.7) | 10 (0.5) | 25 (1.1) | |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Clarithromycin | 95.5 | 3 (1.8) | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.6) | 0.91 |
| Erythromycin | 99.0 | 0 (0) | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 0.99 |
| Clindamycin | 98.0 | 2 (1.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.87 |
| Doxycycline | 100 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.91 |
| Rifampicin | 100 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.99 |
| Gentamicin | 96.6 | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 4 (2.4) | 0.99 |
| Levofloxacin | 91.9 | 1 (0.6) | 6 (3.7) | 2 (91.2) | 0.91 |
| Oxacillin | 97.4 | 0 (0) | 2 (1.2) | 1 (0.6) | 0.95 |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 95.6 | 0 (0) | 2 (1.2) | 4 (2.4) | 0.91 |
| Total | 98 | 7 (0.5) | 11 (0.7) | 12 (0.8) | |
Categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), major error (ME), and minor error (mE) per antibiotic agents used for Gram negative (GN) and Gram positive (GP). Kappa scores of the 2196 antimicrobial agent determinations result of rAST for Gram-negative bacteria isolates and 1476 antimicrobial agent determinations result of rAST for Gram-positive bacteria isolates.