| Literature DB >> 31687384 |
Zifeng Liu1, Xiaoting Su2, Mianli Xiao1, Peien Zhou2, Jianwei Guo2, Yixiang Huang2, Yiqiang Zhan3.
Abstract
Hyperuricemia (HU) is a risk factor for different kinds of chronic noncommunicable diseases, and eating away from home (EAFH) may play an important role in their development, which has been ignored greatly so far. This study aimed to investigate the association between EAFH and HU in different models. A cross-sectional study involving 8,322 participants of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) was conducted. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the data. We found that participants who consumed more away-from-home food had a higher risk for HU, and the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) (for each increment in grades of EAFH) were 1.11 (1.02, 1.20) in a multiadjusted model (adjusted for age, gender, province, net individual income, body mass index, smoking, leisure-time physical activities, energy intake, and sleep duration). As for stratified analyses, the aOR (95% CI) of EAFH was 1.12 (1.01, 1.24) for men and 1.06 (0.92, 1.21) for women. Similar results can be found in the middle-aged and obese population, with aOR (95% CI) of EAFH as 1.17 (1.05, 1.30) and 1.15 (1.03, 1.29), respectively. In conclusion, EAFH is positively associated with the prevalence of HU.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687384 PMCID: PMC6794973 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2792681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Flowchart of study.
Characters of total population and hyperuricemia population and nonhyperuricemia population.
| Characters | Total | Hyperuricemia | Nonhyperuricemia |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8322 | 1280 (15.4) | 7042 (84.6) | ||
| Age, | <0.01 | |||
| Youth | 2298 (27.6) | 286 (22.3) | 2012 (28.6) | |
| Middle age | 4682 (56.3) | 719 (56.2) | 3963 (56.3) | |
| Old age | 1342 (16.1) | 275 (21.5) | 1067 (15.2) | |
| Gender, | <0.01 | |||
| Female | 4444 (53.4) | 489 (38.2) | 3955 (56.2) | |
| Male | 3878 (46.6) | 791 (61.8) | 3087 (43.8) | |
| Province, | <0.01 | |||
| Guangxi | 1023 (12.3) | 221 (17.3) | 802 (11.4) | |
| Guizhou | 757 (9.1) | 161 (12.6) | 596 (8.5) | |
| Henan | 943 (11.3) | 78 (6.1) | 865 (12.3) | |
| Heilongjiang | 859 (10.3) | 141 (11.0) | 718 (10.2) | |
| Hubei | 897 (10.8) | 135 (10.5) | 762 (10.8) | |
| Hunan | 1054 (12.7) | 153 (11.9) | 901 (12.8) | |
| Jiangsu | 1074 (12.9) | 177 (13.8) | 897 (12.7) | |
| Liaoning | 785 (9.4) | 135 (10.5) | 650 (9.2) | |
| Shandong | 931 (11.2) | 80 (6.2) | 851 (12.1) | |
| Net individual income, yuan/year | <0.05 | |||
| <8000 | 2190 (26.3) | 262 (20.5) | 1928 (27.4) | |
| 8000–15000 | 1797 (21.6) | 287 (22.4) | 1510 (21.4) | |
| 15000–20000 | 2871 (34.5) | 447 (34.9) | 2424 (34.4) | |
| ≥20000 | 1464 (17.6) | 284 (22.2) | 1180 (16.8) | |
| Smoking, | <0.01 | |||
| Nonsmoking | 5761 (69.2) | 786 (61.4) | 4975 (70.6) | |
| Smoking | 2561 (30.8) | 494 (38.6) | 2067 (29.4) | |
| Alcohol drinking, | <0.01 | |||
| Yes | 2701 (32.5) | 560 (43.8) | 2141 (30.4) | |
| No | 5621 (67.5) | 720 (56.3) | 4901 (69.6) | |
| Away-from-home eating, | <0.01 | |||
| Nonconsumers | 5209 (62.6) | 757 (59.1) | 4452 (63.2) | |
| Occasional consumers (>0 and <1 meal/d) | 1622 (19.5) | 273 (21.3) | 1349 (19.2) | |
| Frequent consumers (≥1 meal/d) | 1491 (17.9) | 250 (19.5) | 1241 (17.6) | |
| Body mass index (BMI), kg/m2 (IQR) | 23.2 (21.0–25.5) | 24.6 (22.3–27.1) | 22.9 (20.8–25.1) | <0.05 |
| Leisure-time physical activities, MET-h/day (IQR) | 8.92 (4.96–14.12) | 8.32 (4.60–13.41) | 9.03 (5.03–14.19) | <0.05 |
| Sleeping time, h/d (IQR) | 8.0 (7.00–8.00) | 8.0 (7.00–8.00) | 8.0 (7.00–8.00) | 0.17 |
MET: metabolic equivalent; IQR: interquartile range.
Association between EAFH and HU in China, OR (95% CI).
| Population | Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | Model 4d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total population | 1.10 (1.02, 1.19)# | 1.13 (1.05, 1.22)# | 1.11 (1.02, 1.20)# | 1.09 (1.01, 1.19)# |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 1.17 (1.06, 1.28)# | 1.16 (1.05, 1.28)# | 1.12 (1.01, 1.24)# | 1.11 (1.00 |
| Female | 0.94 (0.83, 1.07) | 1.06 (0.93, 1.21) | 1.06 (0.92, 1.21) | 1.03 (0.90, 1.19) |
| Age | ||||
| Youth | 1.00 (0.87, 1.16) | 0.96 (0.82, 1.12) | 0.96 (0.80, 1.14) | 0.94 (0.78, 1.11) |
| Middle age | 1.22 (1.10, 1.34)# | 1.19 (1.08, 1.31)# | 1.17 (1.05, 1.30)# | 1.15 (1.03, 1.29)# |
| Old age | 1.14 (0.93, 1.38) | 1.14 (0.93, 1.39) | 1.10 (0.89, 1.35) | 1.09 (0.88, 1.35) |
| BMI | ||||
| BMI < 24 kg/m2 | 0.99 (0.89, 1.11) | 1.07 (0.95, 1.20) | 1.05 (0.93, 1.18) | 1.04 (0.92, 1.17) |
| BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 | 1.20 (1.08, 1.33)# | 1.16 (1.04, 1.29)# | 1.15 (1.03, 1.29)# | 1.14 (1.01, 1.27)# |
Model 1a: without adjusting for any covariate, unadjusted OR; model 2b: model adjusted for age and gender, adjusted OR; model 3c: model adjusted for age, gender, province, net individual income, BMI, smoking, and leisure-time physical activities, and sleep duration, adjusted OR; model 4d: model adjusted for covariates in model 3 and energy, vegetable, fruit intakes and alcohol drinking, adjusted OR; CL 1.002 gives 1.00 when rounded off to 2 decimal places; #p for trend, p < 0.05.
Figure 2Trend of OR and AIC according to the variation of model complexity.