| Literature DB >> 31687289 |
Paul M Ryan1, C Anthony Ryan2.
Abstract
Background In April 2018, the Irish cervical smear screening programme, "CervicalCheck", came under intense scrutiny as the accuracy of hundreds of "negative" results were brought in question. Aim The goal of this brief report was to assess the impact of this real-life event on public information-seeking behaviour, using Google search anomalies as a proxy. Irish relative search volume data for several terms relating to cervical testing/cancer and human papillomavirus were extracted for a five-year period from February 2014 to January 2019 and analysed for the presence of anomalous spikes and shifts in the mean baseline. Results An unprecedented positive spike in searches relating to cervical testing/cancer was observed immediately after the CervicalCheck revelations, which remained anomalous for the month to follow (p < 0.05). This public interest preceded a mirroring increase in uptake of complimentary consultations offered by the Department of Health to the women concerned. Despite this service engagement and interest in cervical health, the relative search volumes for terms "human papillomavirus infection" and "HPV vaccine" were just 78 and 51% of their maximum search volume for the five-year period. Conclusions Anomaly analysis revealed an unprecedented spike in information-seeking behaviour following the CervicalCheck revelations. However, this was not associated with a comparable elevation in HPV interest. This suggests that more public education and promotion of the HPV vaccine is warranted, in the context of vastly reduced uptake in recent years. Finally, Google Trends data represents a free an open source means by which to assess information-seeking behaviour of the public in relation to health and disease.Entities:
Keywords: cervicalcheck; google trends; hpv; smear test
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687289 PMCID: PMC6818734 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Major relevant events in the months following the disclosure of the CervicalCheck shortcomings
GP, general practitioner
Figure 2Anomaly analysis of cervical smear test-related Google searches and complimentary general practitioner visit uptake response
[A] Detailed relative search volume of “cervical check” and commonly associated terms (lines), with reactionary uptake rates of free general practitioner consultations (bars). [B-E] Anomaly analysis of relative search volume for terms [B] “Cervical Check”, [C] “Cervical Cancer”, [D] "HPV Vaccine", [E] “Human Papillomavirus Infection", over the five year period (2014-2019 inclusive) with anomalies identified by red data points. Relative search volume is standardised to the highest search volume within the timeframe for each individual plot. RSV, relative search volume; GP, general practitioner.
Figure 3Current knowledge and report summary
HPV, human papillomavirus