Literature DB >> 3168723

Focal cone electroretinograms: aging and macular disease.

D G Birch1, G E Fish.   

Abstract

Focal cone electroretinograms were obtained with a 3-degree flickering stimulus from 100 normal eyes and 134 eyes with known macular disease. Responses were obtained during direct visualization of the fundus with a hand-held stimulator-ophthalmoscope. Mean foveal cone amplitude for 100 normal eyes was 0.31 microV, with 95% of all amplitudes greater than 0.18 microV. There was a significant inverse correlation between amplitude and age for responses obtained from the fovea (r = -0.91; p less than 0.001) but not for responses obtained from the parafovea (midway between fovea and disk, r = -0.53; not significant). In eyes with known maculopathy, mean foveal cone amplitude was correlated with Snellen acuity. Even after correcting for normal decreases in amplitude with age, responses were significantly reduced in 88/94 (94%) of all eyes with 20/40 or poorer acuity, suggesting that the focal electroretinogram is a sensitive test for detecting macular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3168723     DOI: 10.1007/bf00154401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  15 in total

1.  A hand-held, two-channel stimulator-ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  M A Sandberg; M Ariel
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-10

2.  Altered pattern evoked retinal and cortical potentials associated with human senescence.

Authors:  G L Trick; L R Trick; K M Haywood
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  An electrodiagnostic index of macular degeneration. Use of a checkerboard pattern stimulus.

Authors:  S Sokol
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-12

4.  The human electroretinogram and occipital potential in response to focal illumination of the retina.

Authors:  J H Jacobson; K Kawasaki; T Hirose
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-10

5.  Local electroretinogram in macular degeneration.

Authors:  W R Biersdorf; D A Diller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  The foveal electroretinogram.

Authors:  J L Bankes
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1967

7.  The influence of age on the electroretinogram and visual evoked potential.

Authors:  C E Wright; D E Williams; N Drasdo; G F Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06-30       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  A comparison of visual function tests in eyes with maculopathy.

Authors:  G E Fish; D G Birch; D G Fuller; R Straach
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Stimulus deprivation amblyopia. Simultaneous recording of local macular electroretinogram and visual evoked response.

Authors:  Y Miyake; S Awaya
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  The human focal electroretinogram as a function of stimulus area.

Authors:  P Errico; B Falsini; V Porciatti; F M Cefalá
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  The electroretinogram: a useful tool for evaluating age-related macular disease?

Authors:  Emma J Berrow; Hannah E Bartlett; Frank Eperjesi; Jonathan M Gibson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Detection of ophthalmoscopically occult maculopathy by focal electroretinography.

Authors:  E T Schmeisser; A D Epstein
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Intraoperative diagnosis of retinal function.

Authors:  W Müller; J Wünscher
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 5.  The clinical utility of the foveal electroretinogram: a review.

Authors:  W R Biersdorf
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The RUSH2A Study: Best-Corrected Visual Acuity, Full-Field Electroretinography Amplitudes, and Full-Field Stimulus Thresholds at Baseline.

Authors:  David G Birch; Peiyao Cheng; Jacque L Duncan; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Isabelle Audo; Janet K Cheetham; Todd A Durham; Abigail T Fahim; Frederick L Ferris; Elise Heon; Rachel M Huckfeldt; Alessandro Iannaccone; Naheed W Khan; Eleonora M Lad; Michel Michaelides; Mark E Pennesi; Katarina Stingl; Ajoy Vincent; Christina Y Weng
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.