| Literature DB >> 31686265 |
Ryuichiro Hirose1,2, Satoshi Obata3,4, Manabu Tojigamori3,5, Masatoshi Nakamura3,6, Shohei Taguchi3, Toru Arima3,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophageal hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux have been recognized as inevitable complications after the definitive gastroschisis operation. Patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux require anti-reflux surgery; however, the surgical adhesions may complicate subsequent surgical therapy, especially in the cases treated by staged repair. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Fundoplication; Gastroesophageal reflux (GER); Gastroschisis; Laparoscopic operation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31686265 PMCID: PMC6828906 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-019-0725-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2198-7793
Fig. 1Gastroschisis at delivery. a The bowel showing marked edema was protruding through the abdominal wall defect. b The wound retraction system (Alexis Wound Retractor, Applied Medical, CA, USA) was used for wrapping and reducing the eviscerated bowel. c Formed silo beside the umbilical cord
Fig. 2a Upper gastrointestinal series on the 51st day revealed a sliding type hiatal hernia and marked GER with crooked esophagus. b Coronal view of the enhanced CT scan on the 53rd day also showed sliding type hiatal hernia
Fig. 3Intraoperative laparoscopic view of the upper abdominal cavity. a Dozens of fibrous bands and adhesion between the small bowel loop (white arrow) and anterior abdominal wall were recognized in the upper abdomen. b Direct view of the widely opened esophageal hiatus (black arrows) before repair. c Hiatal opening was closed around the esophagus with 3 interrupted 3–0 braided polyester sutures. d Short and floppy 360° wrapping was performed with 3 interrupted 3–0 stitches