| Literature DB >> 31685976 |
Qing-Qing Yu1, Da-Xin Cheng1, Li-Ran Xu1, Yan-Kui Li2, Xiao-Ya Zheng2, Yi Liu1, Ya-Feng Li1, Hao-le Liu1, Liang Bai1, Rong Wang1, Jiang-Lin Fan3, En-Qi Liu4,5, Si-Hai Zhao6,7,8.
Abstract
Increasing levels of plasma urotensin II (UII) are positively associated with atherosclerosis. In this study we investigated the role of macrophage-secreted UII in atherosclerosis progression, and evaluated the therapeutic value of urantide, a potent competitive UII receptor antagonist, in atherosclerosis treatment. Macrophage-specific human UII-transgenic rabbits and their nontransgenic littermates were fed a high cholesterol diet for 16 weeks to induce atherosclerosis. Immunohistochemical staining of the cellular components (macrophages and smooth muscle cells) of aortic atherosclerotic lesions revealed a significant increase (52%) in the macrophage-positive area in only male transgenic rabbits compared with that in the nontransgenic littermates. However, both male and female transgenic rabbits showed a significant decrease (45% in males and 31% in females) in the smooth muscle cell-positive area compared with that of their control littermates. The effects of macrophage-secreted UII on the plaque cellular components were independent of plasma lipid level. Meanwhile the wild-type rabbits were continuously subcutaneously infused with urantide (5.4 µg· kg-1· h-1) using osmotic mini-pumps. Infusion of urantide exerted effects opposite to those caused by UII, as it significantly decreased the macrophage-positive area in male wild-type rabbits compared with that of control rabbits. In cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells, treatment with UII dose-dependently increased the expression of the adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, and this effect was partially reversed by urantide. The current study provides direct evidence that macrophage-secreted UII plays a key role in atherogenesis. Targeting UII with urantide may promote plaque stability by decreasing macrophage-derived foam cell formation, which is an indicator of unstable plaque.Entities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; macrophage; plaque; urantide; urotensin II
Year: 2019 PMID: 31685976 PMCID: PMC7468446 DOI: 10.1038/s41401-019-0315-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharmacol Sin ISSN: 1671-4083 Impact factor: 6.150
Fig. 1Quantitation of aortic atherosclerosis by en face Sudan IV staining in UII-transgenic rabbits and their nontransgenic littermates. ♂ male, ♀ female, Tg transgenic, Non-Tg nontransgenic. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. n = 7–10 for each group. *P < 0.05
Fig. 2Quantitation of microscopic aortic atherosclerosis. a Serial paraffin sections of the aortic arch were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and elastica van Gieson (EVG) or immunohistochemically stained with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against either macrophages (Mφ) or smooth muscle α-actin (SMA) for smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Quantitation of intimal lesions on EVG-stained sections (b) and positively stained areas of Mφ (c) and SMC (d). ♂ male, ♀ female, Tg transgenic, Non-Tg nontransgenic. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. n = 7–10 for each group. *P < 0.05
Fig. 3Quantitation of plaque size in urantide infused and control rabbits. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. n = 10 for each group
Plasma cytokine, ALT, AST, and blood pressure levels in each group of rabbits
| Control rabbits | Urantide infused rabbits | |
|---|---|---|
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 186 ± 51 | 121 ± 41 |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 225 ± 78 | 246 ± 102 |
| CRP (ng/mL) | 54 ± 11 | 53 ± 8 |
| ALT (U/L) | 38.00 ± 2.72 | 33.82 ± 1.90 |
| AST (U/L) | 19.70 ± 1.39 | 18.09 ± 1.39 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 98.92 ± 3.62 | 99.56 ± 1.87 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 91.44 ± 3.74 | 88.54 ± 2.14 |
IL-6 interleukin-6, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-α, CRP C-reactive protein, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate transaminase, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressures
Fig. 4Quantitation of microscopic aortic atherosclerosis. a Serial paraffin sections of the aortic arch were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Masson’s trichrome or immunohistochemically stained with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against either macrophages (Mφ) or smooth muscle α-actin (SMA) for smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Quantitation of intimal lesions on EVG-stained sections (b), positively stained areas of Mφ (c) and SMC (d), and collagen content (e). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. n = 7–10 for each group. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 versus the control
Fig. 5Effects of UII and urantide on VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression in HUVECs (a–e). Dose dependent mRNA levels of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 (a, b); protein expression levels of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 after treatment with 50 nM UII with or without urantide (n = 3 for each group) (c, d, e); and plasma UII levels in CAD patients (n = 24 for males and n = 16 for females) (f). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01