Literature DB >> 31685100

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pancreatitis.

Kristin K Porter1, Atif Zaheer2, Ihab R Kamel3, Jeanne M Horowitz4, Hina Arif-Tiwari5, Twyla B Bartel6, Mustafa R Bashir7, Marc A Camacho8, Brooks D Cash9, Victoria Chernyak10, Alan Goldstein11, Joseph R Grajo12, Samir Gupta13, Nicole M Hindman14, Aya Kamaya15, Michelle M McNamara16, Laura R Carucci17.   

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is divided into two types: interstitial edematous and necrotizing. AP severity is classified clinically into mild, moderately severe, and severe, depending on the presence and persistence of organ failure and local or systemic complications. The revised Atlanta classification divides the clinical course of AP into an early (first week) and late phase (after first week) and the clinical phase determines the role of imaging. Imaging has a limited role in the early phase. In the early phase with typical presentations of AP, ultrasound is usually the only appropriate modality and is used for the detection of gallstones. CT and MRI are appropriate in the early phase in equivocal presentations. In the late phase (or at least 48-72 hours after presentation), CT and MRI play a primary role in the imaging of patients with AP for evaluation of etiology, complications, extent of disease, intervention, and follow-up; CT is particularly useful in patients with suspected acute hemorrhage. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Acute pancreatitis; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; Atlanta Classification; Epigastric pain; Interstitial edematous pancreatitis; Necrotizing pancreatitis; Peripancreatic fluid collection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31685100     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  3 in total

1.  A new logistic regression model for early prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis using magnetic resonance imaging and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring systems.

Authors:  Meng-Yue Tang; Ting Zhou; Lin Ma; Xiao-Hua Huang; Huan Sun; Yan Deng; Si-Yue Wang; Yi-Fan Ji; Bo Xiao; Xiao-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09

2.  Computed tomography characteristics of acute pancreatitis based on different etiologies at different onset times: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Juanjuan Du; Ju Zhang; Xinyu Zhang; Rui Jiang; Quanshui Fu; Guoqing Yang; Hui Fan; Mengyue Tang; Tianwu Chen; Xinghui Li; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09

3.  Ultrasonographic Monitoring in 38 Dogs with Clinically Suspected Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Federico Puccini Leoni; Tina Pelligra; Simonetta Citi; Veronica Marchetti; Eleonora Gori; Caterina Puccinelli
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.