| Literature DB >> 31685024 |
Penelope Rostron1, Tom Pennance2,3,4, Faki Bakar5, David Rollinson2,3, Stefanie Knopp2,3,6,7, Fiona Allan2,3, Fatma Kabole8, Said M Ali5, Shaali M Ame5, Bonnie L Webster9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of urogenital schistosomiasis is vital for surveillance and control programmes. While a number of diagnostic techniques are available there is a need for simple, rapid and highly sensitive point-of-need (PON) tests in areas where infection prevalence and intensity are low. Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) is a sensitive isothermal molecular diagnostic technology that is rapid, portable and has been used at the PON for several pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Control; Diagnostics; Elimination; Isothermal; Molecular; Point-of-need (PON); RPA; Schistosoma haematobium; Surveillance; Urogenital schistosomiasis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31685024 PMCID: PMC6827214 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3755-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Sequences of the RT-ShDra1-RPA primers (forward and reverse) and the internal probe together with a description of the specific probe design for the assay
| Primer/probe | Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
| Forward | ATCTCACCTATCAGACGAAACAAAGAAAAT |
| Reverse | AATATGAAACAATTTTCACAACGATACGAC |
| Probe | AATTGTTGGTGGAAGTGCCTGTTTCGCAA(FAM)(THF)(Q)CTCCGGAATGGTTG(C3) (46–52 bp long, 30 bp between 5′-end and THF with a minimum of 15 bp between the THF and the 3′-end of the probe; THF, a basic tetrahydrofuran residue or dSpacer (replaces any bp between the FAM and Q; C3, spacer at the 3’-end; Q, Quencher replaces a T; FAM, replaces a T) |
Fig. 1Dra1 repeat sequence showing the position of the RT-ShDra1-RPA primers (underlined) and probe (bold)
Egg counts (per 10 ml of urine) for the urine samples tested, their egg count category (high > 400; medium 51–400; and very low 1–10) and their RPA results
| Category | Egg count/10 ml | Urine code | RPA results |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | 532 | U1 | + |
| Medium | 102 | U2 | + |
| Very Low | 8 | U3 | + |
| Medium | 156 | U4 | + |
| High | 816 | U5 | + |
| High | 458 | U6 | + |
| Medium | 145 | U7 | + |
| Medium | 368 | U8 | + |
| High | 750 | U9 | + |
| Medium | 137 | U10 | + |
| High | 742 | U11 | + |
| High | 552 | U12 | + |
| High | 926 | U13 | + |
| Medium | 171 | U14 | + |
| Medium | 68 | U15 | + |
| Very low | 3 | U16 | + |
| Very low | 1 | U17 | + |
| Very low | 2 | U18 | ? |
| Very low | 3 | U19 | – |
| Very low | 1 | U20 | + |
Key: +, positive; –, negative; ?, cannot interpret
Notes: There were no samples in the egg count range of 11–50. The urine code corresponds to the RPA curves shown in Fig. 2
Fig. 2RPA fluorescent curves for the S. haematobium gDNA dilutions and the urine samples tested from PHL-IDC, Pemba. a S. haematobium gDNA dilutions. b Urine samples U3-15. c Urine samples U1+2 (high egg counts) and U16-20 (very low egg counts). d Urine samples U1+2 (high egg counts) and negative donor urine (U-ve) and negative donor urine spiked with S. haematobium gDNA (USp). sDNA corresponds to a DNA standard positive control. −ve corresponds to negative controls