| Literature DB >> 31684920 |
Sara J Kuik1, Anne G J F van Zoonen2, Arend F Bos3, Koenraad N J A Van Braeckel3, Jan B F Hulscher2, Elisabeth M W Kooi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The factors that determine the effect of enteral feeding on intestinal perfusion after preterm birth remain largely unknown. We aimed to determine the effect of enteral feeding on intestinal oxygen saturation (rintSO2) in preterm infants and evaluated whether this effect depended on postnatal age (PNA), postmenstrual age (PMA), and/or feeding volumes. We also evaluated whether changes in postprandial rintSO2 affected cerebral oxygen saturation (rcSO2).Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral oxygen saturation; Enteral feeding; Feeding volumes; Fractional tissue oxygen extraction; Intestinal oxygen saturation; Postmenstrual age; Postnatal age
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31684920 PMCID: PMC6827212 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1805-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study population
Patient characteristics during the study period
| Study population | |
|---|---|
| Boys/Girls | 16/13 (65%/45%) |
| Gestational age, weeks | 28 + 1 (25 + 1–30 + 5) |
| Birth weight, g | 1025 (580–1495) |
| Sets of twins | 4 (14%) |
| Small-for-gestational-age ( | 6 (21%) |
| Head circumference on day of birth, centimetres | 25.0 (22.5–29.0) |
| Apgar score at 5 min | 7 (2–9) |
| SNAPPE-II score | 28 (0–77) |
| Intestinal pathologies | |
| Necrotizing enterocolitis/spontaneous intestinal perforation | 4 (14%) |
| Sepsis (including suspected sepsis) | 22 (76%) |
| Circulatory failure | |
| Fluid resuscitation | 7 (24%) |
| Inotropic treatment | 2 (7%) |
| Respiratory supporta | |
| Mechanical ventilation | 16 (55%) |
| Continuous positive airway pressure | 27 (93%) |
| High flow | 7 (24%) |
| Low flow or no support | 15 (52%) |
| Cerebral lesions | |
| Germinal matrix haemorrhage-intraventricular haemorrhage | |
| Grade I | 6 (21%) |
| Grade II | 2 (7%) |
| Transient periventricular echodensities | 10 (34%) |
| Periventricular leukomalacia | 13 (45%) |
| Patent ductus arteriosus | |
| Expectative policy | 7 (24%) |
| Ibuprofen treatment | 6 (21%) |
| Surgical clip | 3 (10%) |
| Hyperbilirubinemia | 23 (79%) |
| Anaemia | 19 (66%) |
| Hemoglobin (mmol/L) | |
| Day 2 | 9.1 (7.6–11.6) |
| Day 3 | 9.0 (6.5–11.6) |
| Day 4 | 8.6 (6.5–11.9) |
| Day 5 | 8.4 (6.8–11.9) |
| Day 8 | 8.5 (6.9–10.6) |
| Day 15 | 8.2 (6.2–9.7) |
| Day 22 | 8.0 (5.7–8.4) |
| Day 29 | 7.8 (6.2–9.5) |
| Day 36 | 8.3 (6.4–9.8) |
| Enteral feedinga | |
| Mother’s milk | 24 (83%) |
| Preterm formula | 20 (69%) |
| Donor mother’s milk | 10 (34%) |
| Infusion rate bolus feeding (mL/min) | 3.4 (0.1–60.0) |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation. SNAPPE-II, Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology - Perinatal Extension II. The data are expressed as median (range) or as numbers (percentages) unless otherwise specified. aThe numbers exceed totals, because a single infant could have several respiratory supports and several types of enteral feeding during the first 36 days after birth
Preprandial compared to postprandial values of rintSO2, rcSO2, intFTOE, and cFTOE values on postnatal days
| M1 Mean (SE) | M2 Mean (SE) | M3 Mean (SE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 2 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, | 40 (11) | 38 (7) | 40 (7) | .46 | 1.00 |
| rcSO2 (%, | 77 (4) | 77 (3) | 78 (3) | .71 | .43 |
| intFTOE ( | 0.48 (0.14) | 0.57 (0.14) | 0.47 (0.14) | .24 | .85 |
| cFTOE ( | 0.13 (0.04) | 0.14 (0.04) | 0.13 (0.04) | .97 | .90 |
| Day 3 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, | 37 (11) | 39 (7) | 41 (7) | .58 | .32 |
| rcSO2 (%, | 75 (4) | 76 (3) | 76 (3) | .30 | .37 |
| intFTOE ( | 0.58 (0.14) | 0.48 (0.14) | 0.51 (0.14) | .18 | .31 |
| cFTOE (n = 25) | 0.17 (0.04) | 0.17 (0.04) | 0.16 (0.04) | .80 | .46 |
| Day 4 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, | 34 (10) | 34 (7) | 35 (7) | .91 | .59 |
| rcSO2 (%, n = 28) | 73 (4) | 72 (3) | 73 (3) | .48 | .83 |
| intFTOE ( | 0.65 (0.14) | 0.59 (0.14) | 0.57 (0.14) | .34 | .19 |
| cFTOE ( | 0.18 (0.04) | 0.20 (0.04) | 0.17 (0.04) | .27 | .67 |
| Day 5 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, | 44 (10) | 38 (7) | 35 (7) |
| |
| rcSO2 (%, | 73 (4) | 72 (3) | 72 (3) | .32 | .19 |
| intFTOE ( | 0.49(0.14) | 0.58(0.14) | 0.48 (0.14) | .16 | .84 |
| cFTOE ( | 0.19 (0.04) | 0.21 (0.04) | 0.21 (0.04) | .26 | .27 |
| Day 8 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, | 39 (10) | 38 (7) | 35 (7) | .61 | .21 |
| rcSO2 (%, | 67 (4) | 71 (3) | 73 (3) | ||
| intFTOE ( | 0.59 (0.13) | 0.56 (0.13) | 0.62 (0.14) | .63 | .66 |
| cFTOE (n = 25) | 0.25 (0.04) | 0.22 (0.04) | 0.20 (0.04) | .27 | |
| Day 15 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, | 34 (10) | 39 (7) | 38 (7) | .13 | .15 |
| rcSO2 (%, | 66 (4) | 64 (3) | 63 (3) | .22 | .09 |
| intFTOE (n = 15) | 0.59 (0.13) | 0.51 (0.13) | 0.58 (0.13) | .17 | .87 |
| cFTOE (n = 19) | 0.28 (0.05) | 0.26 (0.04) | 0.27 (0.04) | .33 | .76 |
| Day 22 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, n = 11) | 48 (10) | 47 (7) | 45 (7) | .67 | .35 |
| rcSO2 (%, | 57 (4) | 58 (3) | 58 (3) | .46 | .39 |
| intFTOE (n = 11) | 0.46 (0.14) | 0.45 (0.14) | 0.46 (0.14) | .93 | .90 |
| cFTOE (n = 14) | 0.36 (0.05) | 0.27 (0.05) | 0.33 (0.04) | .23 | |
| Day 29 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, n = 10) | 44 (11) | 54 (7) | 50 (7) | .18 | |
| rcSO2 (%, n = 12) | 62 (5) | 63 (3) | 62 (3) | .63 | .87 |
| intFTOE (n = 10) | 0.43 (0.14) | 0.40 (0.14) | 0.45 (0.14) | .65 | .78 |
| cFTOE (n = 12) | 0.26 (0.05) | 0.27 (0.05) | 0.28 (0.05) | .71 | .42 |
| Day 36 | |||||
| rintSO2 (%, | 47 (11) | 49 (7) | 46 (7) | .56 | .84 |
| rcSO2 (%, n = 8) | 65 (5) | 65 (3) | 66 (3) | .80 | .52 |
| intFTOE (n = 8) | 0.40 (0.14) | 0.37 (0.14) | 0.50 (0.14) | .65 | .21 |
| cFTOE (n = 8) | 0.26 (0.05) | 0.26 (0.05) | 0.23 (0.05) | .88 | .37 |
Abbreviations: M1 Measurement 1 (preprandial), M2 Measurement 2 (10 to 30 min postprandial), M3 Measurement 3 (30 to 60 min postprandial). The data are expressed as mean (standard errors of the mean) unless otherwise specified. * = P value < .05
Fig. 2Preprandial rintSO2 values compared to postprandial rintSO2 values on postnatal days The bars represent the mean and standard error of the mean of individual rintSO2 values before and after enteral feeding. The mean rintSO2 is marked with a o within the bars. Statistically significant differences are marked with an asterisk: * < .05
Fig. 3Preprandial rintSO2 values compared to postprandial values between PMA groups The bars represent the mean and standard error of the mean of individual rintSO2 values before and after enteral feeding for the different PMA groups; PMA < or ≥ 30 weeks (a), PMA < or ≥ 32 weeks (b). The mean rintSO2 is marked with a o within the bars. Statistically significant differences are marked with an asterisk: * < .05
Enteral feeding volumes of all included infants per day and during NIRS measurement
| Day | Feeding mL/kg/day | Feeding mL/kg/measurement |
|---|---|---|
| 2 (n = 29) | 20.8 (17.8–26.7) | 2.1 (1.4–2.7) |
| 3 (n = 29) | 39.4 (27.9–43.3) | 2.8 (2.3–4.1) |
| 4 (n = 29) | 56.3 (34.5–63.2) | 4.4 (3.2–6.2) |
| 5 ( | 73.1 (44.5–80.9) | 5.6 (3.9–7.8) |
| 8 (n = 27) | 101.2 (68.1–125.7) | 8.9 (5.3–12.7) |
| 15 ( | 149.3 (88.8–152.3) | 12.4 (8.7–13.3) |
| 22 ( | 150.1 (139.8–156.2) | 14.0 (12.2–19.0) |
| 29 ( | 145.4 (127.7–153.2) | 17.2 (11.9–18.6) |
| 36 ( | 149.5 (125.7–154.1) | 18.4 (14.8–19.1) |
The data are expressed as median (interquartile range)
Fig. 4Postprandial change in rintSO2 values in infants with and without abdominal complications The boxes represent the change in rintSO2 values of the clustered data from the first two postnatal weeks between the 25th and 75th centiles (interquartile range) between baseline and 10–30 min after feeding (a) and between baseline and 30–60 min after feeding (b) for infants without abdominal complications (uncomplicated), infants who developed feeding intolerance (FI), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and a spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP); the whiskers represent the range of the values with the exception of outliers. Outliers are represented by the circles and diamonds, defined as values between 1.5 interquartile range and 3 interquartile ranges from the end of a box. # < .10