Literature DB >> 3168417

Automated urinalysis.

D A Carlson1, B E Statland.   

Abstract

Many sources of variation affect urinalysis testing. These are due to physiologic changes in the patient, therapeutic interventions, and collection, transportation, and storage of urine specimens. There are problems inherent to the manual performance of this high-volume test. Procedures are poorly standardized across the United States, and even within the same laboratory there can be significant technologist-to-technologist variability. The methods used can perturb the specimen so that recovery of analytes is less than 100 per cent in the aliquot examined. The absence of significant automation of the entire test, with the one exception of the Yellow IRIS, is unusual in the clinical laboratory setting, where most other hematology and chemistry testing has been fully automated. Our evaluation of the Yellow IRIS found that this system is an excellent way to improve the quality of the results and thereby physician acceptance. There is a positive impact for those centers using this instrument, both for the laboratory and for the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3168417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab Med        ISSN: 0272-2712            Impact factor:   1.935


  7 in total

1.  Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.

Authors:  S Mayo; D Acevedo; C Quiñones-Torrelo; I Canós; M Sancho
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Comparative Performance Analysis of Urised 3 and DIRUI FUS-200 Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers and Manual Microscopic Method.

Authors:  Emre Yalcinkaya; Hayriye Erman; Eray Kirac; Afife Serifoglu; Alperen Aksoy; Ferruh K Isman; Mustafa B Cekmen
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2019-09-27

3.  Usefulness of an automated urinary flow cytometer in mass screening for nephritis.

Authors:  Kazunari Kaneko; Mutsumi Murakami; Kazumi Shiraishi; Masaru Matsumoto; Kuniaki Yamauchi; Teruo Kitagawa; Yuichiro Yamashiro
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Urinalysis and urinary tract infection: update for clinicians.

Authors:  J L Young; D E Soper
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001

5.  Comparison of the performance of the IDEXX SediVue Dx® with manual microscopy for the detection of cells and 2 crystal types in canine and feline urine.

Authors:  Annalisa M Hernandez; Graham E A Bilbrough; Dennis B DeNicola; Celine Myrick; Suzanne Edwards; Jeremy M Hammond; Alex N Myers; Johanna C Heseltine; Karen Russell; Marco Giraldi; Mary B Nabity
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  LX-8000R and UriSed 2 fully automated urine analyzers comparison to manual microscopic examination.

Authors:  Canpolat Erkan Revşa Evin; Özgür Aslan
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Preanalytical requirements of urinalysis.

Authors:  Joris Delanghe; Marijn Speeckaert
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.