| Literature DB >> 31684132 |
Fan Yang1,2, Zhiming He3, Yuanhua Fu4, Liang Li5, Kui Jiang6, Fangyan Xie7.
Abstract
Bioradar-based noncontact breathing detection technology has been widely studied due to its superior detection performance. In this paper, a breath detection mechanism based on the change in radar cross section (RCS) is proposed by using a forward scatter radar and the deduction of the mathematical model of the received signal. Furthermore, we completed human breathing detection experiments in an anechoic chamber and in an ordinary chamber; we obtained the breathing rate through envelope detection in cases where the human orientation angle was 0, 30, 60, and 90°. The analysis of the measured data shows that the theoretical model fits well with the measured results. Compared with the existing single-base radar detection schemes, the proposed scheme can detect human respiratory rates in different orientations.Entities:
Keywords: RCS; forward scatter radar; noncontact detection; respiration rate
Year: 2019 PMID: 31684132 PMCID: PMC6864815 DOI: 10.3390/s19214778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Forward scatter radar structure; (b) changes in the frontal projection of the human abdomen during breathing.
Figure 2Use of imageJ to measure the projected frontal area on exhalation and inhalation (a) inhalation status; (b) exhalation status.
Figure 3Experiment setup in the anechoic chamber.
Figure 4(a) The received signal of the forward scatter radar (FSR) system in the anechoic chamber; (b) the output of the envelope detection; (c) the simulated signal for the analytical model.
Figure 5(a) Experiment setup in the common room; (b) the experiment system block diagram.
Figure 6The antenna’s information (a) the antenna model; (b) antenna prototype; (c) radiation pattern in 3D; (d) radiation pattern.
Figure 7The flowchart of the proposed FSR system.
Figure 8The received signal of the FSR system with a different orientation angle α for (a) 0°; (b) 30°; (c) 60°; (d) 90°; (e) the received signal of the FSR system with nobody in the test area.
Figure 9The output of the envelope detection with the different orientation angle α for (a) 0°; (b) 30°; (c) 60°; and (d) 90°.
Figure 10The comparison between FSR and PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) with the different orientation angle α for (a) 0°; (b) 90°.
The experiment results at different angles.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0° | 227 | 144 | 87.34% |
| 30° | 255 | 180 | 87.9% |
| 60° | 240 | 170 | 88.8% |
| 90° | 240 | 175 | 89.6% |