Literature DB >> 31683157

Investigating combined toxicity of binary mixtures in bees: Meta-analysis of laboratory tests, modelling, mechanistic basis and implications for risk assessment.

Edoardo Carnesecchi1, Claus Svendsen2, Stefano Lasagni3, Audrey Grech4, Nadia Quignot5, Billy Amzal5, Cosimo Toma6, Simone Tosi7, Agnes Rortais8, Jose Cortinas-Abrahantes8, Ettore Capri9, Nynke Kramer10, Emilio Benfenati6, David Spurgeon2, Gilles Guillot11, Jean Lou Christian Michel Dorne12.   

Abstract

Bees are exposed to a wide range of multiple chemicals "chemical mixtures" from anthropogenic (e.g. plant protection products or veterinary products) or natural origin (e.g. mycotoxins, plant toxins). Quantifying the relative impact of multiple chemicals on bee health compared with other environmental stressors (e.g. varroa, viruses, and nutrition) has been identified as a priority to support the development of holistic risk assessment methods. Here, extensive literature searches and data collection of available laboratory studies on combined toxicity data for binary mixtures of pesticides and non-chemical stressors has been performed for honey bees (Apis mellifera), wild bees (Bombus spp.) and solitary bee species (Osmia spp.). From 957 screened publications, 14 publications provided 218 binary mixture toxicity data mostly for acute mortality (lethal dose: LD50) after contact exposure (61%), with fewer studies reporting chronic oral toxicity (20%) and acute oral LC50 values (19%). From the data collection, available dose response data for 92 binary mixtures were modelled using a Toxic Unit (TU) approach and the MIXTOX modelling tool to test assumptions of combined toxicity i.e. concentration addition (CA), and interactions (i.e. synergism, antagonism). The magnitude of interactions was quantified as the Model Deviation Ratio (MDR). The CA model applied to 17% of cases while synergism and antagonism were observed for 72% (MDR > 1.25) and 11% (MDR < 0.83) respectively. Most synergistic effects (55%) were observed as interactions between sterol-biosynthesis-inhibiting (SBI) fungicides and insecticide/acaricide. The mechanisms behind such synergistic effects of binary mixtures in bees are known to involve direct cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition, resulting in an increase in internal dose and toxicity of the binary mixture. Moreover, bees are known to have the lowest number of CYP copies and other detoxification enzymes in the insect kingdom. In the light of these findings, occurrence of these binary mixtures in relevant crops (frequency and concentrations) would need to be investigated. Addressing this exposure dimension remains critical to characterise the likelihood and plausibility of such interactions to occur under field realistic conditions. Finally, data gaps and further work for the development of risk assessment methods to assess multiple stressors in bees including chemicals and non-chemical stressors in bees are discussed.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bees; Interactions; Laboratory toxicity; Mixtures; Pesticides; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31683157     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  9 in total

1.  Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality.

Authors:  Harry Siviter; Emily J Bailes; Callum D Martin; Thomas R Oliver; Julia Koricheva; Ellouise Leadbeater; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Airborne particulate matter and health effects on bees: A correlation does not indicate causation.

Authors:  Ilaria Negri; Giancarlo Capitani; Marco Pellecchia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Individual and combined impacts of sulfoxaflor and Nosema bombi on bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) larval growth.

Authors:  Harry Siviter; Arran J Folly; Mark J F Brown; Ellouise Leadbeater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Toxicity of the insecticide sulfoxaflor alone and in combination with the fungicide fluxapyroxad in three bee species.

Authors:  C Azpiazu; J Bosch; L Bortolotti; P Medrzycki; D Teper; R Molowny-Horas; F Sgolastra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Review on Sublethal Effects of Environmental Contaminants in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera), Knowledge Gaps and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Agata Di Noi; Silvia Casini; Tommaso Campani; Giampiero Cai; Ilaria Caliani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  A mechanism-based approach unveils metabolic routes potentially mediating chlorantraniliprole synergism in honey bees, Apis mellifera L., by azole fungicides.

Authors:  Julian Haas; Johannes Glaubitz; Udo Koenig; Ralf Nauen
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.462

7.  A Population-Based Human In Vitro Approach to Quantify Inter-Individual Variability in Responses to Chemical Mixtures.

Authors:  Lucie C Ford; Suji Jang; Zunwei Chen; Yi-Hui Zhou; Paul J Gallins; Fred A Wright; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  First application of an Integrated Biological Response index to assess the ecotoxicological status of honeybees from rural and urban areas.

Authors:  Ilaria Caliani; Tommaso Campani; Barbara Conti; Francesca Cosci; Stefano Bedini; Antonella D'Agostino; Laura Giovanetti; Agata Di Noi; Silvia Casini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Pollen Treated with a Combination of Agrochemicals Commonly Applied During Almond Bloom Reduces the Emergence Rate and Longevity of Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Queens.

Authors:  Dylan F Ricke; Chia-Hua Lin; Reed M Johnson
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.