Linda M Delahanty1, Paula M Trief2, Donald A Cibula3, Ruth S Weinstock4. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York. 3. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York. 4. Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify barriers to weight loss and physical activity, as well as approaches used by coaches, in a real-world, community sample of adults with metabolic syndrome (at risk for type 2 diabetes) who participated in a Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)-adapted weight loss intervention and compare findings to data from the screened and highly selected DPP sample. METHODS: SHINE (Support, Health Information, Nutrition, and Exercise) was a telephonic DPP adaptation. Primary care staff delivered the DPP curriculum, and lifestyle coaches provided monthly direction to achieve weight loss. For this substudy, barriers to weight loss and physical activity described by participants, as well as approaches coaches used to address them, were gathered. Groupings of barriers (DPP defined) were analyzed in relation to demographic characteristics and compared to data from the DPP sample. RESULTS: Top weight loss barriers were problems with self-monitoring, too little physical activity, internal thought/mood cues, vacation/holidays, and social cues. Percentages reporting a barrier were much higher in SHINE. Top physical activity barriers were problems with self-monitoring, access/weather, time management, aches/pains, and vacation/holidays. These did not correspond closely to DPP data. Coaches used problem solving, self-monitoring skills review, increased physical activity, and motivational strategies. SHINE coaches were more likely than DPP coaches to use alternative approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to weight loss and physical activity in a community sample of persons at risk for diabetes occurred at much higher rates than in the highly screened DPP sample. Training coaches in a variety of patient-centered approaches may maximize their positive impact.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify barriers to weight loss and physical activity, as well as approaches used by coaches, in a real-world, community sample of adults with metabolic syndrome (at risk for type 2 diabetes) who participated in a Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)-adapted weight loss intervention and compare findings to data from the screened and highly selected DPP sample. METHODS: SHINE (Support, Health Information, Nutrition, and Exercise) was a telephonic DPP adaptation. Primary care staff delivered the DPP curriculum, and lifestyle coaches provided monthly direction to achieve weight loss. For this substudy, barriers to weight loss and physical activity described by participants, as well as approaches coaches used to address them, were gathered. Groupings of barriers (DPP defined) were analyzed in relation to demographic characteristics and compared to data from the DPP sample. RESULTS: Top weight loss barriers were problems with self-monitoring, too little physical activity, internal thought/mood cues, vacation/holidays, and social cues. Percentages reporting a barrier were much higher in SHINE. Top physical activity barriers were problems with self-monitoring, access/weather, time management, aches/pains, and vacation/holidays. These did not correspond closely to DPP data. Coaches used problem solving, self-monitoring skills review, increased physical activity, and motivational strategies. SHINE coaches were more likely than DPP coaches to use alternative approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to weight loss and physical activity in a community sample of persons at risk for diabetes occurred at much higher rates than in the highly screened DPP sample. Training coaches in a variety of patient-centered approaches may maximize their positive impact.
Authors: Susan M Devaraj; Jenna M Napoleone; Rachel G Miller; Bonny Rockette-Wagner; Vincent C Arena; Chantele Mitchell-Miland; Mohammed Bu Saad; Andrea M Kriska Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-10-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ian J Neeland; Bjorn Eliasson; Takatoshi Kasai; Nikolaus Marx; Bernard Zinman; Silvio E Inzucchi; Christoph Wanner; Isabella Zwiener; Brian S Wojeck; Henry K Yaggi; Odd Erik Johansen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Maud Joachim-Célestin; Thelma Gamboa-Maldonado; Hildemar Dos Santos; Susanne B Montgomery Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2020 Jan-Dec