Swapna Devadula1, Danette Langbecker2, Phillip Vecchio1, Joanne Tesiram1, Judith Meiklejohn2, Helen Benham1,3. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia. 2. Centre for Online Health-Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia. 3. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia.
Abstract
Background: Telehealth has the potential to improve access to specialist rheumatology services. The timely and appropriate delivery of care to those living with rheumatological diseases is crucial to ensuring excellent long-term outcomes. Introduction: The outcomes of a tele-rheumatology service delivered to regional hospital outpatient clinics were evaluated with patient perspectives and acceptability analyzed. Materials and Methods: A tele-rheumatology clinic was commenced in Australia from a metropolitan hospital to five regional clinics. The model of care included a trained nurse at the spoke site linked to a rheumatologist from the hospital hub site for follow-up consultations of stable review patients using videoconferencing. Surveys assessing perspectives on the tele-rheumatology encounter were completed and a subsample participated in focus groups to further explore acceptability. Results: Forty-eight patients with a diverse range of conditions participated. Patient travel was reduced on average by 95 km and 42% avoided time off work. Eighty-eight to 100% of participants agreed/strongly agreed with statements relating to acceptability, quality of physician-patient interaction, and nurse involvement. Twenty-nine percent expressed the need for a physical examination by a specialist rheumatologist and 25% felt that an in-person consultation would establish better patient-physician rapport. Qualitatively, participants viewed tele-rheumatology as equivalent to in-person care after an initial adjustment period. Discussion: Tele-rheumatology through videoconferencing for follow-up of patients with established disease is acceptable to patients and demonstrates the potential to improve time, travel, and cost burdens placed on patients who live remotely compared with traditional, face-to-face rheumatology care. Conclusions: Implementation of sustainable and patient acceptable models of tele-rheumatology care may allow timely access to all patients living with rheumatological conditions.
Background: Telehealth has the potential to improve access to specialist rheumatology services. The timely and appropriate delivery of care to those living with rheumatological diseases is crucial to ensuring excellent long-term outcomes. Introduction: The outcomes of a tele-rheumatology service delivered to regional hospital outpatient clinics were evaluated with patient perspectives and acceptability analyzed. Materials and Methods: A tele-rheumatology clinic was commenced in Australia from a metropolitan hospital to five regional clinics. The model of care included a trained nurse at the spoke site linked to a rheumatologist from the hospital hub site for follow-up consultations of stable review patients using videoconferencing. Surveys assessing perspectives on the tele-rheumatology encounter were completed and a subsample participated in focus groups to further explore acceptability. Results: Forty-eight patients with a diverse range of conditions participated. Patient travel was reduced on average by 95 km and 42% avoided time off work. Eighty-eight to 100% of participants agreed/strongly agreed with statements relating to acceptability, quality of physician-patient interaction, and nurse involvement. Twenty-nine percent expressed the need for a physical examination by a specialist rheumatologist and 25% felt that an in-person consultation would establish better patient-physician rapport. Qualitatively, participants viewed tele-rheumatology as equivalent to in-person care after an initial adjustment period. Discussion: Tele-rheumatology through videoconferencing for follow-up of patients with established disease is acceptable to patients and demonstrates the potential to improve time, travel, and cost burdens placed on patients who live remotely compared with traditional, face-to-face rheumatology care. Conclusions: Implementation of sustainable and patient acceptable models of tele-rheumatology care may allow timely access to all patients living with rheumatological conditions.
Authors: Su-Ann Yeoh; Kristen Young; Michael Putman; Sebastian Sattui; Richard Conway; Elizabeth Graef; Adam Kilian; Maximilian Konig; Jeffrey Sparks; Manuel Ugarte-Gil; Laura Upton; Francis Berenbaum; Suleman Bhana; Wendy Costello; Jonathan Hausmann; Pedro Machado; Philip Robinson; Emily Sirotich; Paul Sufka; Jinoos Yazdany; Jean Liew; Rebecca Grainger; Zachary Wallace; Arundathi Jayatilleke Journal: ACR Open Rheumatol Date: 2021-11-17
Authors: Grace Johnstone; Gareth J Treharne; Benjamin D Fletcher; Roisin S M Lamar; Douglas White; Andrew Harrison; Simon Stebbings Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Susan Shenoi; Kristen Hayward; Megan L Curran; Elizabeth Kessler; Jay J Mehta; Meredith P Riebschleger; Helen E Foster Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 3.054
Authors: Megan O'Grady; Tom O'Dwyer; James Connolly; Joan Condell; Karla Muñoz Esquivel; Finbar D O'Shea; Philip Gardiner; Fiona Wilson Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-03-10