| Literature DB >> 31681810 |
Aida I Vientós-Plotts1,2,3, Aaron C Ericsson1,4,5, Hansjorg Rindt1,3, Carol R Reinero1,2,3.
Abstract
It is unknown how the respiratory microbiome influences and is influenced by bacterial pneumonia in dogs, as culture of lung samples and not microbial sequencing guides clinical practice. While accurate identification of pathogens are essential for treatment, not all bacteria are cultivable and the impact of respiratory dysbiosis on development of pneumonia is unclear. The study purposes were to (1) characterize the lung microbiome in canine bacterial pneumonia and compare deviations in dominant microbial populations with historical healthy controls, (2) compare bacteria identified by culture vs. 16S rDNA sequencing from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) culture-, and (3) evaluate similarities in lung and oropharyngeal (OP) microbial communities in community-acquired and secondary bacterial pneumonia. Twenty BALF samples from 15 client-owned dogs diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia were enrolled. From a subset of dogs, OP swabs were collected. Extracted DNA underwent PCR of the 16S rRNA gene. Relative abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were determined. The relative abundance of bacterial community members found in health was decreased in dogs with pneumonia. Taxa identified via culture were not always the dominant phylotype identified with sequencing. Dogs with community-acquired pneumonia were more likely to have overgrowth of a single organism suggesting loss of dominant species associated with health. Dogs with secondary bacterial pneumonia had a greater regional continuity between the upper and lower airways. Collectively, these data suggest that dysbiosis occurs in canine bacterial pneumonia, and culture-independent techniques may provide greater depth of understanding of the changes in bacterial community composition that occur in disease.Entities:
Keywords: bronchoalveolar lavage; culture; dog; dysbiosis; microbiota; pneumonia; respiratory; sequencing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31681810 PMCID: PMC6798064 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Comparison of culture and targeted sequencing results for lower airways (BALF) and relative abundance of predominant OTU in BALF found in upper airways.
| A* | 99.30 | 99.30 | 10.88 | |||
| B* | Not detected | 53.30 | 7.67 | |||
| 44.60 | 1.72 | |||||
| C* | Not detected | 99.60 | 7.87 | |||
| Not detected | ||||||
| <0.01 | ||||||
| <0.01 | ||||||
| <0.01 | ||||||
| D | 96.40 | 96.40 | ||||
| E | Not detected | 25.90 | ||||
| 15.40 | ||||||
| 13.30 | ||||||
| 11.40 | ||||||
| 6.80 | 10.50 | |||||
| F | 0.20 | 37.90 | ||||
| 20.60 | ||||||
| 11.20 | ||||||
| Not detected | 10.40 | |||||
| G1* | 24.30 | 24.49 | 3.90 | |||
| 1.30 | Family | 26.40 | 0.001 | |||
| <0.01 | ||||||
| G2* | 2.80 | 17.23 | 10.96 | |||
| 13.7 | 0.03 | |||||
| G3* | 14.30 | 31.10 | 15.21 | |||
| 14.30 | 6.68 | |||||
| 10.80 | 10.80 | 15.33 | ||||
| H | 1.70 | 25.90 | ||||
| 13.80 | ||||||
| I1* | 74.50 | 74.50 | 1.52 | |||
| 1.50 | ||||||
| I2 (L) | 6.20 | 31.30 | ||||
| 18.60 | ||||||
| I3 (R) | 92.00 | 92.00 | ||||
| 5.30 | ||||||
| J | 8.40 | 20.30 | ||||
| 12.70 | ||||||
| 12.50 | ||||||
| 10.30 | ||||||
| K | No growth | 71.90 | ||||
| L | 8.50 | 30.20 | ||||
| 11.90 | ||||||
| M1* | 34.80 | 34.80 | 51.89 | |||
| 13.10 | 0.32 | |||||
| M2* | 6.40 | 25.88 | 32.13 | |||
| 15.77 | 12.48 | |||||
| N* | 3.80 | 57.10 | 1.08 | |||
| Not detected | ||||||
| 2.30 | ||||||
| O* | No growth | 50.20 | 0.84 | |||
| 17.00 | 0.02 | |||||
Asterisks indicate dogs providing paired BALF samples and OP swabs.
Patient demographics related to samples included in the current analysis.
| A | Siberian husky | MC | 8 years | 24.5 | CAP |
| B | Great Dane | F | 6 months | 25 | CAP |
| C | Great Dane | F | 6 months | 32.4 | CAP |
| D | Giant Schnauzer | FS | 1 year | 25 | CAP |
| E | Bulldog | MC | 4 months | 8 | CAP |
| F | Great Dane | MC | 5 years | 71 | CAP |
| G | Mixed | MC | 1 year | 13.5 | SBP; megaesophagus; AP |
| H | Mastiff | FS | 10 months | 30 | SBP; upper airway obstruction; AP |
| I | Mixed | MC | 8 years | 8.8 | SBP; chronic lower airway disease |
| J | Chesapeake Bay retriever | FS | 4 years | 31.7 | SBP; chronic lower airway disease |
| K | Mixed | FS | 1 year | 10.7 | SBP; pyothorax |
| L | Maltese | MC | 6 years | 9.8 | SBP: tracheal FB; AP |
| M | Welsh corgi | MC | 2 years | 8.6 | SBP; tongue myopathy; AP |
| N | Mixed | FS | 10 years | 13 | SBP; UES achalasia; AP |
| O | Border collie | MC | 12 years | 22 | SBP; laryngeal paralysis; AP |
MC, male castrated; FS, female spayed; CAP, community acquired pneumonia; SBP, secondary bacterial pneumonia; AP, aspiration pneumonia; FB, foreign body; UES, upper esophageal sphincter; Letters designated with
, paired OP and BALF samples.
Figure 1Principal component analysis of samples from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and oropharyngeal swabs (OP), for a select number of cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and secondary bacterial pneumonia (SBP); circles represent BALF, squares represent OP, SBP samples are in orange and CAP samples are in purple.
Figure 2Intra-subject Jaccard (orange) and Bray-Curtis (blue) similarity between BALF and OP microbiota in cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and secondary bacterial pneumonia (SBP); dotted lines indicate mean inter-subject similarity between all samples. Results of Student's t-test shown on chart.
Figure 3Comparison of relative abundance in BALF and OP between community acquired and secondary bacterial pneumonia.